|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
ccharles000
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 01:09 AM Original message |
We just lost in a D+28 district.(The Dem was a crook and that is why we lost) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
1. And we should have. That's an irresposible headline. He was a crook. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 01:13 AM Response to Original message |
2. I don't know the candidates involved, but there ARE nightmare Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 01:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. This should jog your memory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 01:50 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Ah yes. I remember now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
camera obscura
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 01:17 AM Response to Original message |
3. I just posted this in GD :) have to say I'm not sorry to see him go. Just wish he'd been primaried. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 01:49 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. In the first primary election, 75% of Dems voted against him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 01:18 AM Response to Original message |
4. Well, I'm glad he is gone. It is too bad we couldn't have primaried him out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 01:22 AM Response to Original message |
5. Good. We're a better party without him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CalGator
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 02:09 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. winning the seat back in '10 will look good in the midterms, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Not the Only One
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 11:06 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Yep, sometimes doing the right thing is painful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 03:00 AM Response to Original message |
10. Cao is apparently a community organizer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Sheds
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. He won't become a Dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
12. We didn't lose anything, Jefferson lost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
14. It was a defeat of those who advocate using freezers as safes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
15. Congratulations to Cao in this year of firsts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
16. Cao was just on CNN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
17. Mr. I had tons of cash in my freezer is finally gone. He should have been disbarred though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
political_Dem
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
18. I hate to say this, but with Cao, we have another Jindal in the making. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 06:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I agree - nothing to celebrate IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Two Sheds
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 08:50 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. LA is a GOP stronghold but the 2nd district is not and can't be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
political_Dem
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. And maybe not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 09:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. All of the money in the world won't save Cao |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
political_Dem
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 09:56 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. I hope so. And I hope that this is done before the GOP realizes what potential they have in Cao. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadowLiberal
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 10:05 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Yep, only way Cao can win again is by getting another corrupt & in legal trouble opponent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite
![]() |
Sun Dec-07-08 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
19. LIkely to be a one-termer, like Nick Lampson... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
political_Dem
![]() |
Mon Dec-08-08 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
26. CBS NEWS: Boehner--"The Future Is Cao" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC