|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
SuperTrouper
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:21 AM Original message |
Blagojevich's Fall is a blow to Jesse Jackson, Jr.'s Senate Ambitions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
1. We are so F**ked by this corrupt Plutocracy: CORPORATE United States of America. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:46 AM Response to Reply #1 |
18. But But But... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:53 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Yah, it's been over time. Like putting a frog in warm water and slowly turing up the heat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prolesunited
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:14 AM Response to Reply #19 |
30. If we're so fucked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. IMO, that's a silly question. This is ... "... Underground" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prolesunited
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #35 |
40. No. I meant in the fascist USA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #1 |
47. Rod Blagoevich is part of the "plutocracy"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dreamer Tatum
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
59. Can you explain what you mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
2. No it isn't. I've read he wasn't going to appoint JJJ. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Perhaps not, but this cesspool of Chicago politics will smear Jackson. Now it is indeed amazing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:28 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. JJJ is an outstanding rep. imo, so I hope he won't be painted with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:35 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. who do you think "candidate 5" is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:41 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. I don't know as I don't know who was interested in the position; I'm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genna
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #14 |
106. Well, who do you think it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
3. No, people are not guilty by association. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:28 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Both Patterson and Spitzer had their pecadillos exposed to the public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:30 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Neither case had anything to do with the other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:32 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. And he will appoint Sweet Caroline and not Cuomo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:01 AM Response to Reply #10 |
21. You really think Caroline and Cuomo will complete? They are cousins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #21 |
32. The deal: Sweet to Senate, Andy to the Governorship after Patterson is done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #32 |
39. "After" can be a long time, as NY does not term limit its governors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:31 AM Response to Reply #21 |
38. Cuomo used to be married to Caroline's cousin, but they divorced back in 2003 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iceman66
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
6. I hope he gets impeached soon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
8. do you think he's candidate 5 ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olkaz
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
11. Who cares? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
12. Jesse Jr. met with him yesterday. He may have blown the whistle on the Governor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
13. "I've got enough trouble in terms of Illinois politics. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:39 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Quite prophetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #15 |
48. or quite informed. ;-) NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gidney N Cloyd
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
16. It's not just Chicago. The whole state is corrupt! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olkaz
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 10:58 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. That's hilarious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Q. Why did Nixon call off the 1960 recount? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olkaz
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. That's the best you can do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #26 |
33. Hard to believe you are from Illinois. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olkaz
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #33 |
51. Okay, so machine politics does not exist in Chicago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:09 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Of course it does. So machine politics does not exist in the rest of Illinois? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olkaz
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:21 PM Original message |
How is that comparison useful? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
58. No. The above poster said downstate was WORSE, not equivalent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olkaz
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. I don't think our opinions are that divergent, honestly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #60 |
79. To that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
22. You know jack shit about New York politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:06 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Say what? I grew up in the Bronx, I know from Abzug, Badillo, Molinari, Serrano, and Solarz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. There's more to NY than just the city. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
23. Corruption in Chicago? Nooooo, say it ain't so........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:17 AM Response to Reply #23 |
31. Care to elaborate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #23 |
34. Yeah, it's like selling access to the Lincoln Bedroom, I guess. Good thing Obama is clean, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:28 AM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Why do you assume she meant Obama. Hillary's ties run deeper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:33 AM Response to Reply #36 |
41. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #36 |
63. It just cheers the cockles of my heart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #34 |
61. Sleeping overnight in the Lincoln Bedroom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #61 |
78. Now you're trying to split hairs. Selling access is as unethical as selling Senate seats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #78 |
92. No comparison, selling a senate seat is illegal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 04:09 PM Response to Reply #92 |
97. Both actions are deeply unethical... like adultery in the Oval Office with an intern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #23 |
54. Wow! Stereotype much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Nope, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Yeah, and Arkansas politicians are all slick HillBillies, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #56 |
64. Oh, Clark......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 01:50 PM Response to Reply #64 |
70. AL seems much worse. Face it, you're tarring Obama's IL w/ a Clintonian broad brush grudge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #70 |
73. My appreciation for the goings on in IL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #73 |
77. Uh huh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #77 |
89. O ye of little faith..................... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #89 |
96. You never give me cause for HOPE that you'll CHANGE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 09:55 AM Response to Reply #96 |
99. And you, my friend, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 10:12 AM Response to Reply #99 |
101. The Clintons have earned my criticism and I feel free to say exactly how/why/when. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #101 |
105. Well, your guy earned mine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. How'd he do so in this issue? Or the Gov. Blago issue we were discussing earlier? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. I didn't mean on the Blago issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:22 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Should have joined the Obama campaign instead of all those thugs with whomever you supported. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:58 PM Response to Reply #57 |
65. The thugs I'm thinking of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #65 |
74. Oh, then there are the thugs who sent "Obama is a Muslim" emails... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. Some fools forwarded an email, they didn't initiate it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 02:11 PM Response to Reply #76 |
82. Oh, so that makes it okay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #82 |
87. I'll withhold judgment on how "terrific" he is until he actually does the job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #87 |
93. He has been doing a great job of being President-Elect so far... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #93 |
95. A man won, let's leave it at that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 02:12 PM Response to Reply #65 |
83. Did they show their tits? Got pictures? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 03:02 PM Response to Reply #83 |
88. Nope, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 02:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
81. I really don't think people in New Jersey should be throwing stones. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 10:38 AM Response to Reply #81 |
102. LOL!! Especially after Torricelli and McGreevey scandals. NJ is up there with AK and IL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 10:05 AM Response to Reply #23 |
100. Hey, on the how do you like your Senators thread, you said you were from NJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 10:39 AM Response to Reply #100 |
103. True. Here in CT we have our scandals, too, remember Rowland? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wndycty
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
28. Are you kidding me? Rod and Jesse hate one another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:33 AM Response to Reply #28 |
42. That may be the case, but I read yesterday that they met for 90 minutes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prolesunited
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #28 |
44. Sure is interesting to have all these people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prolesunited
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
29. And you're backing this up with what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
37. That's likely one reason the Bush admin's political Justice dept acted now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prolesunited
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #37 |
43. Umm, I'm just happy this scheme was stopped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:39 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Why do you believe such allegations with no proof, whatsoever? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prolesunited
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #45 |
49. Well, because I live in the Chicago area |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #49 |
52. The FBI and the Justice department are controlled by Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
46. why do you think Jesse Jr was Blago's preferred candidate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #46 |
67. Nothing wil surprise me. JJJ always has given me a negative vibe, perhaps my paranoia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
50. Only if Jackson or his supporters were willing to bribe Blago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #50 |
62. Senate Candidate #4 and #5 appear to have been ready to pay-to-play. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodhue
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 01:29 PM Response to Reply #62 |
69. Candidate 4 is a deputy governor, so not JJJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 01:51 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Oh boy, the speculation is driving me c razy. Hopefully we'll know details soon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alwysdrunk
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #71 |
91. There are rumors that #5 was some businessman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddowfan
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
66. So There Is A Silver Lining |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Hear, hear!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
72. The talk over the weekend was that Blago was going to name Emil Jones, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. Emil Jones???????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 02:11 PM Response to Reply #75 |
80. That's what the local news media were saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #80 |
86. I'm sure voters didn't know how corrupt the guy was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #75 |
84. The following have two things in common... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. I have no beef with Rev. Jackson. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #85 |
90. Misunderstood "Like the father, detest the son." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #90 |
94. I had no negative feelings toward Jr. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildonion
![]() |
Tue Dec-09-08 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
98. What are any good articles out there on the situation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
104. If Blagojevich had planned to appoint Jackson... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
109. There's probably going to be a special election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC