|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Lil Missy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 12:49 AM Original message |
Is it true Obama can grow the USSC from 9 to 11? And it's legal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
1. I don't know if that would go over well with anyone, its like stuffing the court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
2. If he tried to, Congress would raise holy hell, like they did to FDR... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lil Missy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 01:00 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Oh man, freepers heads would explode! LOL! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalpragmatist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
3. It used to be common for Congress to change the number of Supreme Court seats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 12:54 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. That's about the gist of it, in my understanding as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 12:52 AM Response to Original message |
4. NO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
6. Constitution does not specify number of SCOTUS judges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
7. Obama can't. Congress can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lil Missy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 01:01 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Maybe in 2010. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 01:19 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. wouldn't have mattered if we made 60 (or even 70) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 01:02 AM Response to Original message |
10. FDR tried it, and almost doomed his presidency. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 01:35 AM Response to Original message |
12. They can grow it or shrink it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 01:36 AM Response to Original message |
13. FDR tried it. It nearly destroyed FDR. Obama won't make the same mistake. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-10-08 03:40 AM Response to Original message |
14. Its a bad idea because the entire practice leads to a nuclear option kind of deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 13th 2025, 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC