Rasmussen: Currently, 93% of liberals approve of what Obama is doing. Up from Nov Poll Numbers!

[FrenchieCat]

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2008/12/liberals-upset.html

93%! That's damn good! :woohoo:

[Undercurrent]

1. .

Of course this level of support would not be apparent if you just read posts on DU, or listened to the MSM drivel and drool.

[FrenchieCat]

12. Well, who would we be if we weren't miserable?

[Undercurrent]

29. Happy?

Guess that's to much to ask for, eh?

Personally I have enough misery in my own small life to be wallow in misery online. But that's just me. Obviously, there are a good number of other folks who view online communities as fight clubs. Just wish they'd remember who exactly the enemies are who need to be punched out.

[ecstatic]

2. this is the first time I recall seeing a poll of liberals

ha!

[ClarkUSA]

3. But, but, but... where are all those "bitter, angry progressives" I've been hearing about on DU??

:shrug:

[Phx_Dem]

4. Pssst. Hey Tweety, what do you think about them apples?

[FrenchieCat]

6. He's moved on to opining that Obama has to prove his innocence!

Wouldn't you know it!

[Phx_Dem]

9. Yep. He found a juicier story to push.

Once again the "facts" that Obama is not involved whatsoever, per Patrick Fitzgerald don't get in Tweety's way.

[mckeown1128]

5. what a nice (and accurate) reading of this poll :) nt

[thatsrightimirish]

7. No!

Everyone is unhappy and I will not let all evidence suggest otherwise. Politico said we are unhappy and that is what we are.

[FrenchieCat]

8. I'm sure Politico interviewed one person who was probably a Republican

as usual!

[progressoid]

10. I'm fucking misable!

But that probably has more to do with my prostate...:eyes:

[FrenchieCat]

11. Sorry about that! :(

[progressoid]

28. It's so bad I can't even spell!

Mostly, I'm just grumpy lately.

[Uzybone]

13. But but but...

Sirota said we are mad!!!

[ShortnFiery]

14. Well, this dyed in the wool LIBERAL is part of the 3 percent = "Somewhat Unfavorable"

I'm also part of the 1-3% of the population who are profoundly allergic to topical antibiotics like "Neosporin."

Go Figure. :silly:

[FrenchieCat]

15. You count for 2% of the 3% considering how often you post

your somewhat displeasure without really saying anything of substance.

But that's ok...By the time of the swearing in, you'll make up the entire 3% unfavorable. I can't wait! :woohoo:

[ShortnFiery]

16. Oh, how thoughtful of you to note.

Unlike you, I don't start umpteen threads that, IMO, suck-up to (slobber all over?) "political royalty" that can only lead me to conclude - YOU BELIEVE that they, by birthright (the political elite ruling class), are entitled to Political High Office. That, my friend and IMO, is not LIBERAL.

Yes, clearly we disagree and despite your half-hearted attempt to marginalize my opinion, I am NOT alone.

Sincerely, I hope you have a good evening dear valued and fellow member of DU. :hug:

[FrenchieCat]

17. I started one thread on Caroline Kennedy.

See, now you are lying on me. That ain't good.
But I still love you! :hi:

[ShortnFiery]

18. Well then I stand corrected.

:blush: It just must have SEEMED like "umpteen." :-) :hi:

[FrenchieCat]

23. Well you responded in that thread like umpteen times,

but since I started the thread looking for coments, who was I to complaint? :shrug:

:pals:

[ShortnFiery]

25. Party on baby, last thing I would want to do is spoil your "high."

Enjoy. :-)

[Mark E. Smith]

20. So who put the gruntled in dis?

Or is it who put the ump in grrrr?

Your fight against the sour pusses
heartens me.

[mwei924]

19. But the 7% are louder and more obnoxious than the 93%

[ShortnFiery]

22. Yes, because we are "the canary in the coal mine" our opinion obviously doesn't count.

:eyes:

[FrenchieCat]

24. Naw, your opinions count.....

But only once. :)

[Occam Bandage]

33. If you're a canary in a coal mine,

why aren't you lying silent and still on the bottom of your cage yet?

[Kahuna]

27. LOL! MUCH more obnoxious.

:wow:

[DCBob]

21. I suspected this was the case. Angry Dems are few and far between.

I think we can safely ignore them.

[FrenchieCat]

26. We don't have to ignore them.....we just have to make sure that

they understand that no matter how many times they protest,
their voice is still only one voice out of many.

[rvablue]

31. And while I have not protested one decision or appointment by PE Obama

their voice is one of many, but my onevote, and their onevote and my one voice and their onevoice are just as good as your ONE VOICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[FrenchieCat]

37. That is correct, we all have one vote and one voice.

That was my point. :shrug:

Some act like their voice is more meaningful or powerful then that of others (like the 7%).....
when it is counted just the same.....and should be.

[TheKentuckian]

30. Excluding people based on their name is no better than promoting

them based on the same reason.

[DeepModem Mom]

32. K&R

[AtomicKitten]

34. He's working on the other 7%.

[TexasObserver]

35. and the other 7% are here, starting threads complaining about Obama

[Milo_Bloom]

36. But as people point out here all the time.. he hasn't DONE anything.

How soon they forget.

[FrenchieCat]

38. Oh, he's done plenty......

in his own way.

Just not anything that could be considered as enough to write him off,
as some have been doing with each cabinet appointment.

[Milo_Bloom]

41. Write him off... no. Show serious concern... yes.

Big difference between the 2, as many don't seem to understand.

[Hope And Change]

39. K & R!

[bunnies]

40. Bookmarked.

So I can put this in every "the left is angry" thread. Next thing we'll hear is that Liberals are not the 'real' left. :rofl:

[mzmolly]

42. Well ..... we know where the other 7% are.

;)