|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 06:07 PM Original message |
Rep. Jackson: 'I reject and denounce pay-to-play politics' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. " No conversations with Candidate 5 were ever picked up on any of the bugs or wiretaps." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 09:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Thanks, Prosense that has to be emphasized |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 09:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. So what was the context of Blagojevich's "name dropping"? Was he mentioning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
2. Blago was wheeling and dealing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 06:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. The media convicted Jackson without any facts whatsoever. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. The authorities seemed to believe Blago was talking a bunch of %$@% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. The fact that Jackson had nothing to do with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
6. Fitz already said no one in the indictment but Blago and his chief of staff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 09:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Yeah, but evidently that doesn't matter. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
psychmommy
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 09:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. not yet indicted. still in the complaint stage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew
![]() |
Wed Dec-10-08 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
11. I felt the claim he was involved was inconsistent with who Jr. has shown himself to be. He should > |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC