Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sun-Times: White House has rejected a recent request by Obama to occupy Blair House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:17 AM
Original message
Sun-Times: White House has rejected a recent request by Obama to occupy Blair House
An Obama rejection ...

President-elect Barack Obama just got nixed!

Sneed hears the White House has rejected a recent request by Obama to occupy Blair House, the president-elect's Washington residence, at an earlier date.

• • To wit: Sneed hears Obama wanted to move his family and his transition team to Blair House, which is across from the White House, nearly two weeks before the president-elect historically moves there on Jan. 15 -- five days before the inaugural.

• • The backshot: A source tells Sneed: "There were reportedly two reasons for the request: Obama's children start school in early January -- and the move could be interpreted as a New Year's symbolic gesture showing the president-elect in a presidential capacity across from the White House on Jan. 2, the day after New Year's Day."

• • The buckshot: Blair House, the president's guest house for visiting dignitaries, nixed the request. "It was a polite rejection," the source added. "But I'm told Blair House was appalled."

• • Responses: An Obama spokesman tells Sneed they were told Blair House had guests until Jan. 15. ... Sally McDonough, a spokesman for first lady Laura Bush, tells Sneed: "Respectfully, we are keeping transition conversations quiet. But Jan. 15 is historically the time when incoming presidents occupy Blair House, which is the president's guest house."
-snip-

http://www.suntimes.com/news/sneed/1325772,CST-NWS-SNEED11.article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Who's staying there? Campaign contributers? Really, the House should be available to the PE no
later than Jan 1. Those kids have to start school, and it's ridiculous to have to move twice - and have to pay for their housing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'd also like to know who the "guests" are.
In a presidential transition year, it seems odd to me that guests are scheduled to stay at Blair House up to the day the new First Family is scheduled to move in. Nice scheduling, george and laura. I hope check-out time is early enough to prepare the place for the Obamas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. CHENEY is staying there. Or at least the vice prez is supposed to be living there.....


Also the Blair House has been used when the White House is under renovations (like during Truman and IKE)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Cheney lives at Number One Observatory Circle
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 10:39 AM by GloriaSmith
The Blair House is the President's guest house.

On edit: link

http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/life/vpresidence.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. They don't have to pay for housing
There are scores of DC mansions that owners and friends of the Obamas will be happy to let them use. Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. its not a matter of cost as much as security i would think
Because the kids are going to be starting school, there is a greater need for the Obamas to take up residence in DC before January 15 than has been the case in previous administrations. In terms of a secure location for the first family-to be, Blair House has significant advantages over any other place that they might stay. For that reason, it was a reasonable request. While it may not have been unreasonable for it to be denied, it would have to be a pretty compelling reason, imo.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afikpo Chic Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
63. strange strange strange
why can't obama just have patience? i don,t even believe this story. i mean, they could easily stay at a hotel in dc until they officially move in. looks tacky to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Blair House? Maybe Tony thinks it's his, and that's why Obama can't have it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. The Blair House is the US Vice president's House. it is located Next door to 1600 pensylvania Ave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. No, Blair House is not the US VP House--they live in the Naval Observatory superintendants house.
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 12:13 PM by WI_DEM
http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/photoessays/vpresidence/04-js.html

Blair House is usually for visiting head of state. Though President Truman occupied it from 1949-1952 while the White House was being renovatted. An attempted assasination of Truman took place at Blair House in November, 1950.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
51. For some reason, I always had thought it was the veep's residence, too,
but you're right, it isn't. It's the preident's guest house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. That house should be available to the P-E anytime after the election...
but especially after the Holidays. It would probably help transitions to go easier and more smoothly which, especially during times of trouble, benefits America. We NEED the Obama Admin to hit the ground running.

It also makes a LOT of sense for any children of a P-E. Moving and changing schools is difficult under normal circumstances but IME it's a bit easier when kids are coming back from a big break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. This whole story is kind of weird. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. "appalled"
Oh please. :eyes: There are many things in this world to be appalled at - but this sure as hell isnt one of them. Losers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Obama wants to move in early so his kids can go to school? I am APPALLED! The nerve!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. I know. He's so uppity. Oh, and pretentious. How dare he!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Find out who is staying and have them evicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. Why aren't we standing out in front of Blair House chanting "Get out of Obama's House!"
Like they did to Al Gore after the Supremes stole the election of 2000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I was thinking that too.
But then it occurred to me those people telling Gore to get out were probably Brooks Brothers operatives, i.e. paid pukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. "appalled"?
I'm appalled that the Blair House was "appalled" over the fact that a family with young kids are attempting to make the transition as easy as possible! If the house isn't being used, then I really don't see the harm in allowing the Obama Family to stay there 15 whole freakin' days earlier than originally scheduled.

This is petty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
15. Here is a pic of the Blair House
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 11:05 AM by Jennicut




It is not the VP's residence, the house at the Naval Observatory


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Thanks for the pics!
I'd seen the Naval Observatory house before, but not the Blair House...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
17. Stay classy, Republicans!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. This story should be spread bigtime!
Shame them into some decency!!! They can't give up a couple of rooms so the kids can start school? Please!
More family values from the GOP scumbags, imo. With them attacking Obama for some vague complicity in Blago's depredations, I have let go of my bipartisan post-election good will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. How can one not assume the worst about their motives
when they use words like "appalled" to describe their feelings about PE Obama moving his family in early?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. Wierd doesn't begin to cover it
Why would Blair House be "appalled?"

Appalled at having to turn down the Obamas?

Appalled at being asked in the first place (which is definitely the way it reads)? :shrug:

And why would Blair House have to say no? Who is staying there now?

Blair House is the Executive Branch's private hotel so it should be available.

Unless Dick Cheney's lard ass can't be bothered to move out fast enough.

Or Is Laura staying there and not in the family quarters?

Just wierd all the way around.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. Blair House is appalled?! Does that mean the Bushie assholes who run it are appalled?
They act as if Blair House is a private bed and breakfast.

This means the Bushes are not through using the perks of office, and they'll use them until they're made to leave by law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kick...just more petty and strange ridiculousness....thank god there's only 40 more days of this. n/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. Bush's poodle needs his home!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
27. Why is anyone surprised by this? The rethugs aren't going to give up anything until the very last
second.

If they even leave at all since there is still time for them to create some crisis that requires them to stay in office. :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
28. Excuse me, but it was bad form to ask for the house in the first place.
Blair House is used for diplomatic purposes and it is booked well in advance.

There are plenty of other accommodations that the Obamas can make in DC if they need to arrive sooner than anticipated. They can stay at a hotel, a friend's home or they can rent a place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. What was bad form was for this story to be leaked to the press.
I have no problem for Obama to make the request, and I have no problem with it being turned down if, as is likely the case, Blair House already is reserved for the first part of the month. But this all could and should have been handled quietly and without any publicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Of course it shouldn't have been leaked.
I come from a family of politicians and diplomats and know how protocol is very important in the diplomatic sphere. Obama should have arranged for other accommodations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Why is that? Because the outgoing President's guests are more important?
In 1942 the house was purchased by the U.S. government and has since been the official residence for guests of the U.S. president. Blair House is primarily used to house foreign heads of state visiting the president, but it has also been used for domestic guests.

Several presidents-elect of the United States have spent the night before their inauguration in the house. President George W. Bush arranged for former First Lady Nancy Reagan to stay at the house in 2004 and receive guests there following the state funeral for her husband, former president Ronald Reagan; the same was done for former First Lady Betty Ford in 2006 following the state funeral of her husband, former president Gerald Ford.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blair_House
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Well, they are not less important.
Bush is still president, whether we like it or not, and he has a right to decide the use of Blair House until he leaves office. Besides, the house is usually booked well in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. that is true, but the circumstances do suggest that an effort at accomodation should've been made
The situation presented by the Obama transition differs from most recent transitions. The Obama children are about to start a new school and therefore it is important that the new first family take up residence in DC before Jan 15. Blair House is by far and away, from a security standpoint, the best place for them to stay. Therefore it was not unreasonable for them to make the request and, imo, the request should've been accomodated unless there was a compelling reason not to do so. I don't know the details of the reason for turning them down, so I'm not offering a judgment as to whether it was reasonable or not. But asking was eminently reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. The reason for turning them down appears to be that the house
is already booked (which it usually is). Why should those people be displaced? A president deserves all due consideration, but so do others.

There's a vast array of places where they can stay. Heck, maybe Hillary can put them up for a couple of weeks. It's already SS approved and there's plenty of room. I'm sure Mrs. Rodham would be tickled pink to have the little girls running around.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #41
53. That is where bad manners come into play. Bush knew that a New President
would be coming to town this election around.

The house appears to have been used quite often for the purpose of housing a Prez-Elect before inauguration, so this is not a unique new situation.

In otherwords, the Bushes should not have booked Blair House, knowing that around the time (unlike the other 8 years) of the inauguration, a new President might need to be accomodated.

Also, after November 4th and once the elections were settled, the Bushes, if they had even an ounce of class in their bodies, would have rerouted any scheduled guests and accomodated them elsewhere, to make room for the New President. That would have been classy and appropriate, since it is taxpayers that maintains this home, and if we elected President Obama, it means that we consider him damn important.....especially compared to some ambassador of some foreign country!

The Guests are coming for what I wonder.....the inauguration of President Obama perhaps? If so, that would be more than ironic.

The Bushes whose lack of grace is noted....could have accomodated the Obamas if they chose to. They chose not to, according to this story. Although I am not surprised that the Bushes might act that way, it doesn't make it appropriate, and it certainly doesn't make the Obamas, if they asked, out of line in anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. It also says that historically the President-Elect & family don't move into the Blair House
until Jan 15. It makes sense that it would be booked up until then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverlil Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #53
72. Obama should be allowed
to stay in Blair House. I read somewhere in the last couple of days, that President Clinton moved to Blair House around Jan 5th and another President moved in earlier than the 15th, but I cant remember the name now.
The security will be much better for him to stay at Blair House. Obama should have top priority afterall this house also belongs to the taxpayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #41
58. That's actually a great idea!
The Obamas should stay with Hill and Bill for the weeks between early Jan and the 15th. Problem solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #38
47. Perhaps the Bushes don't want it getting around that they behaved like decent people
to the Obamas. They might lose the remaining 12 people in their base.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
60. Bush is not acting like he's president. He's out kicking footballs around.
And for this, the rudest administration I have ever ever ever seen, to suddenly be "appalled" that the usual rules of decorum are not expressed is laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Ridiculous. People change their travel plans all the time
AND their accommodations. There is no higher priority than smoothing the transition and there have to be other venues that can be used for guests.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. The transition has been smooth so far.
I'm sure the Obamas will find suitable accommodations for the 2 weeks prior to the 20th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #32
45. The Mayflower or Hay Adams are the traditional places to stay. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Well, I'm sure the Obamas can just get a hotel on Priceline and that should be easy peasy.
It's not a logistical nightmare for his staff and secret service detail or anything. :eyes:

Seeing as the Blair House is traditionally the place where the PE stays in the days before the inauguration, and it's set up to accommodate diplomatic guests at other times, I'm guessing it's a bit more equipped to handle the logistics involved in keeping the PE safe. Not at all "bad form" for them to try and make the transition easier for their family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. They can always stay at the Mayflower.
Wouldn't be the fist president to stay there. Like the Waldorf in NY, it can handle the security concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. It was good enough to for the Roosevelts and most others. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Ask Pickles about that
Supposedly she spends more time there than at the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #44
62. Ooooohhhhh..ding ding ding
THAT would be an interesting spin. Heh, heh.

Ok..we need to see a LIST of those "previously scheduled events". Now. Shouldn't be a problem, right, chimpass??
Surely some creative Dem blogger world could camp out near/run by Blair House between Jan 5th and 15th to see who is coming and going and what "events" are being held.
Guess Pickles could be staying there so she can still run across the street for an occassional photo op with chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
70. Not really. Asking to move in "early" isn't bad form especially when the country needs him t'now.
I'm of the philosophy "Ask always, but be prepared to accept 'No' as an answer". If he had asked and if accomodations had been made it wouldn't have been an issue.

Obama is probably less p-o'd than we are, but the thing is he is trying to ease the burden on his family and they are going to be our "First Family" so accomodations should go toward them and move other people who are there temporarily to nice accomodations.

The President has 2 complete Airforce One's and staff entirely set up to duplicate the White House's ability to have the President's finger on the pulse of the nation. We want him to hit the ground running then put hurdles in his way. Kind of non-productive if you ask me.

Obama has Secret Service people and staff of his own to accomodate and you can't have the guy in the next room listening in to top secret conversations about the direction he'll be taking.


...the president-elect historically moves there on Jan. 15 -- five days before the inaugural..


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #28
73. The bookings should have been kept clear
but then these assholes aren't very good at looking past the next two days anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
31. Can the Bushes be any more trashy?
Forty days and counting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
40. Ain't that a bitch? They are appalled that the President Elect
along with his two young daughters who need to start school asked to stay there? These fuckers never cease to amaze me. I don't care who was staying there? Whoever that is can get a fucking hotel or rent a place. He's the President Elect of these United States of America. This would never ever have been done to another first family. I hate these bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. Bitch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. yep...it's a figure of speech...if it's bad
i'm sure someone will alert and it'll be deleted...but I meant that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
42. I don't believe this story. That Obama asked and that the Bush WH refused.
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 05:48 PM by MookieWilson
And future WH residents often stay at the Mayflower or Hay Adams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. I hope you are right....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. It just doesn't pass the smell test with me.
I don't think the Obamas would ask any favors of the Bushes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
52. What's the story on the Trowbridge House.....
... which is the house next door. This website.....

http://www.trowbridgehouse.org/home.html

Says they are hoping to restore what was an office building to make it a home for former Presidents and their families. But the website also says "Coming in 2006."

Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. just posted about it. As far as I know the renovations were completed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
54. It was acceptable for Obama to ask and for it to be denied n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
55. The more I think about this, the less I believe it to be an accurate story
Among other things, why would the Obamas ask to stay at Blair House. Wouldn't Trowbridge House be a more likely choice. WHat is Trowbridge House, you ask? It is adjacent to Blair House and is specifically reserved for former presidents to stay in. Well, the only former presidents at this point in time are George HW Bush, who has a place to stay (with chimpy in the WH), Bill Clinton (who has a place to stay -- he and Hillary own a place in DC), and Jimmy Carter, who probably would be more than happy to give up a spot at Trowbridge House for the Obamas. Indeed, it is highly unlikely that any of the past presidents would need a place to stay in DC for the pre-Jan 15 period at issue here, so that if the Obamas stayed in Trowbridge from, say Jan 3 to Jan 14, they could just move next door to Blair House on the 15th.

I can't be the only one to have thought this through, so either I'm missing something or the story is to be doubted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Maybe......
... Bush is gonna surprise us all and, in an effort to retrieve SOME but of likeablilty ... move out after New Years and the Obamas can move in three weeks early!

Hey, a girl can dream, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #55
64. Well you doubted its accuracy but it appears I tipped the this yesterday courtesy . . .
. . .of the Sun-Times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
61. They only thing that's appalling is the Bush Admin's
response that Obama's request was appalling. If the place is occupied, fine. Just say so politely -- there's no reason to be a dick about it. The Obama's have two young kids who start school in early January so it's perfectly understandable that they might want to be town earlier than Jan. 15.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzShellG Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
65. No room at the inn, huh?
And at Christmas too. Shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #65
71. Kind of chilling when you think about it.
Our first black president and still not letting him into the neighborhood until the law requires it.

BUT then it's probably MORE because he's a DEM Pres.

IF Obama had been Rethug AND Black, like Colin Powell, for instance the rethugs would have made it THE MOST SPECTACULAR TRANSITION SHOW IN THE WORLD.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
66. "symbolic gesture showing the president-elect in a presidential capacity"
A gesture to whom? The world? Like the world knows whether the podium from behind which he speaks is in Blair House or the fucking Ramada Inn. "Across from the White House"? What, he's going to sleep with the window open so he can hear the Bat Phone when it rings at 3 a.m.? Maybe he can offer some neighborly advice to georgie porgie over the hedge?

Anyone who thinks the "move could be interpreted as a New Year's symbolic gesture showing the president-elect in a presidential capacity" is deluded and has become drunk on the cult of personality kool-aid. The man has no constitutional power, and no right to act like he does. The Constitution says he becomes President on January 20th. He has said on numerous occasions that the country only has one President at a time.

As for the Obama girls starting school in early January, does it really matter where the 10 vehicle caravan full of SUV's filled with automatic weapons takes off from? Is it farther from Blair House to their school than it would be from the Mayflower or the Hay Adams? And if it is, who cares?

Much ado about nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
67. I hope somebody steps forward and offers the Obamas a place to stay
There's got to be somebody in DC, a senator or lobbyist or some other dignitary, who has extra room to allow them a place to stay for a couple of weeks so the girls can start school. I'm sure we'll be hearing about the arrangements in a few days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
68. Oh please. It was sensible for them to ask, and the denial is fine.
Edited on Sat Dec-13-08 11:53 AM by antfarm
The article explains that the President-Elect does not usually move into the house until the 15th. It is simply booked already, and not through some nefarious plot against Obama.

Can you imagine the outrage we would be seeing here if the situation were reversed - the Bushes were incoming, and they ousted people who had booked the place months in advance? There would be howling and rending of garments about the Imperial Presidency and calls for respect for the common man.

C'mon, people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #68
69. I'm glad to see I'm not the only one that thinks this too
it's fine that the Obama's asked and fine that it was denied. Much ado over nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC