Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lanny Davis: "It's in his interest to be completely transparent here."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:31 AM
Original message
Lanny Davis: "It's in his interest to be completely transparent here."
Here comes POS Lanny...lecturing Barack on what he needs to do.

VIDEO - http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/12/no-comment-on-b.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Huffington was also saying that on Morning Joe.
But she also said that once he answers questions, everyone should move on since Obama had nothing to do with it. To which Pat replied "Noooo...he could still answer all of the questions and more questions will be swirling!" or some BS. But anyway, why is Lanny Davis still around, and employed at that? I do think some of the calls for "transparency" by the press are a little, um, transparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is the talking-point du jour.
I even heard it on Chicago-Tribune-owned WGN news this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Lanny Davis needs to STFU. He's nothing less than "a joke" based on the way he shamelessly
shilled for HRC and, at the same time, threatened and bad-mouthed Obama.

To say that the likes of one each, Lanny Davis, is an objective democratic strategist is absurd on face value alone. I see the whores in the M$M are just trying to stir up controversy and are not at a loss for pseudo-democratic leaning hyenas to fit the role of "useful idiot."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Missing the biggest case
Bush needs to be completely transparent.
The media attacking Obama over this is utter hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Bingo!! ..... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oviedodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. HOw come I didn't hear these strident calls for Bush to answer to his many issues?
OHHH I know the media is a liberal bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Actually, he may know that from his days in the Clinton administration
Had the Clintons at the very beginning been completely transparent and moved very quickly to get all the White water information out, it could have avoided the investigation that ended up dominating his years in office. At least one behind the scenes Clinton book (by Sidney Blumenthal) spoke of how a group of 14 Democratic Senators pleaded with them to do so - and were met with stonewalling. HRC was actually the angrier of the two from his account.

The fact is Fitzgerald and the tapes say that Obama did nothing wrong. It would have nice if Davis mentioned that before the election, Obama answered several hours (I think 3) of questions on Rezko openly with the conservative Chicago Tribune. The result, they wrote an editorial that they were satisfied with his answers and they later endorsed him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The GHWB Justice Dept. did an investigation and declared Whitewater a non-issue.
The Clintons didn't want to feed the sharks twice. It would encourage them.

But I think they should have opened it up earlier, also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. At the time I am speaking of there had not yet been an investigation
Here is a link to a Parry article, chosen because he is as anti-Bush as you can get, there was no investigation into Whitewater under GHWB. There was an unethical attempt to use the Justice department to push the case on the failed S&L (Morgan Guaranty Trust) where there were people with connections to the Clintons - to get a damaging new story (the Clintons would only be listed as witnesses - but the story would still hurt. http://www.consortiumnews.com/2002/032202a.html

(Had the GHWB campaign simply pointed to Clinton links to the man who ran the failed bank, it would have been typical opposition research - no different than Hillary Clinton pointing to Rezko. They stepped over the line when they attempted to use the Justice Department to expedite the case - which luckily failed.)

At that point, there were questions - and over the years, the answers were found - and no laws were broken, but it took years to get to that point and the Clintons did stonewall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. No Lanny... you need to say "Fitzgerald found no link to Obama" and shut your piehole
The guy just loves the sound of his obnoxious voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. The main link here is that they're both politicians from Illinois
Obama can't be more transparent than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. They're working overtime to create a link that doesn't exist
We're talking about a Governor that called Obama a motherf*****r for not giving him what he wanted for crying out loud! How is that not proof enough?

This is absolutely ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
13. The Godfather of all PUMAs speaks...funny, he didn't say that about Monica Lewinsky...
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 11:02 AM by ClarkUSA
Lanny is pissed because Team O wants nothing to do with him. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC