Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DoJ Blocking Obama Team From Docs on Torture, Wiretapping

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 07:47 PM
Original message
DoJ Blocking Obama Team From Docs on Torture, Wiretapping
Source: The Raw Story

The Justice Department has evaded a request from President-elect Barack Obama's transition team for documents about the secret programs of U.S. intelligence agencies.

The team asked to "review classified legal opinions related to secret CIA and National Security Agency programs," but the inquiry has been denied.

Among the information requested are official documents about the "legal rationale" for the secret wiretapping and torture programs conducted by the two agencies.

Attorney General Michael Mukasey addressed the issue with reporters, saying that his department was reluctant to give up the documents without permission from the two agencies involved.

"And so what we try to do is determine whether, and to what extent, we can clear that information and try to do it as quickly as we can so as to get it to the transition team so that they're aware of all the things that they need when they take over on the 21st," Mukasey said, according to a transcript provided by the department.

An editorial demanded Friday that Obama fulfill his promise to end torture.

"He can begin to fulfill this pledge by signing an executive order that bans torture and inhuman treatment. In doing so, he would end the legal double-speak clouding U.S. policy and send a clear message to all Americans that torture and ill-treatment of detainees will not be tolerated."

A former interrogator wrote in a new book that the US military’s use of torture is responsible for the deaths of thousands of US soldiers by inspiring foreign fighters to kill Americans.

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/DoJ_blocking_Obama_team_from_docs_1212.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. time to pull rank
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Yup.
"Okay! You're all fired!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. The B*sh . "Justice Department " .. ..
Maintaining it's disdain for justice to the bitter end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The OBSTRUCTION of Justice Department
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. What good does this do when he will have full access in a month?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. A lot can be shredded or burned in that time.
That is the only logic I can come up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. The powers of the Office of President Elect probably don't formally extend . . .
to demanding agencies produce documents outside of "normal" channels. In that sense, Mukasey is being prudent. Sure he's dragging his feet, but it's hard to fault him too intensely. With regard to shredding, they've had since the Abu Ghraib pictures started circulating to put their shredding program in place. I doubt there's an incriminating document they are aware of that hasn't been atomized already.

There's the rub for criminals, though: "they are aware of." Even their best efforts are not going to get everything -- especially in the Internet age. There will be (already are) mass quantities of damning documentation to hang these traitors with -- if anyone has the will to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think you are right.
They won't be able to cover every footstep. But, will anyone be willing to tug at each loose thread? Doubtful.

I wonder, though. If this is a request beyond what is usual? And, if so, what is Obama's intention? Does he just want to be fully aware of what has been done to fix it, stop it or to prosecute it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Someone is going to lose their jobs ...and it's well deserved. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well in a month and 17 days
you can't hide behind anything. Might as well come clean now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC