Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This EPA pick kinda sucks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 07:47 PM
Original message
This EPA pick kinda sucks
For the most part, I've been impressed with Obama so far. I've been OK on his cabinet picks and early moves, but I have a real issue with this one.

-----------
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/15/lisa-jackson-epa-chief-ja_n_151221.html

"But Jackson's critics, including a senior scientist who quit her department in frustration, say she has been too close to industry, withheld information from the public and fallen well short of the pledge she made when taking office in February 2006 to fix the state's beleaguered toxic waste program.

"The most important thing we are doing is developing a new ranking system to prioritize sites so that we focus our resources on the worst cases, those that present the greatest risk to public health and the environment," said Jackson in state senate testimony (PDF) in October 2006.

But two years into Jackson's tenure, the new system for cleaning up New Jersey's 16,000 abandoned toxic waste sites still hasn't been deployed.

"She identified this as her highest priority, but she never followed through," says Jeff Ruch, executive director of the Washington D.C.-based Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, or PEER. "This failure to perform risk-based ranking for determining cleanup priorities has contributed to the belated discovery of contaminated schools and day care centers."

---
I have to wonder if the people who freaked out over RFK Jr. being possibility, due to the issue of vaccines (which has zero to do with the EPA) are satisfied with someone getting the position who has as lousy a record as this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. FWIW, the RFK vaccine issue spoke to his integrity on scientific matters, or lack thereof.
Obama's own environmental plan shows that it isn't a priority for him and this pick only reinforces that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I agree. This pick is disappointing.
Although less disappointing than if he chose RFK Jr. She appears to be a tool of corporations but it depends on who you ask, the PIRG or the Sierra Club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have never in my entire life seen any issue that involves so much lockstep
As the issue of vaccines. So it is likely that Kennedy was punished for his stand.

When medical researchers realized that Reyes syndrome could injure and kill a young child with a fever who was given an aspirin, nobody began a campaign of doom against those medical professionals espousing this idea. No one said, "Well you don't understand what antibiotics and pain relievers have done for the populace as a whole." And the researchers were not blacklisted or condemned.

But any time that somebody suggests that day old infants should not be given vaccines that person is ridiculed and blacklisted. Andrew Wakefield merely suggested that vaccines be given separately, and then he was demonized.

RIP, Truth. YOur place in the scientific world has been replaced with the notion of Corporate loyalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well, the mercury fan club will love her
also from huffpo:

"Critics of Jackson's approach have also focused on what they see as her weak response to two contaminated New Jersey sites: One is a multi-million-dollar condominium community built on top of land where high levels of chromium, a carcinogenic chemical, have been found. The other involves Kiddie Kollege, a day care center developed inside an abandoned thermometer factory, where more than 30 children were exposed to mercury, a neurotoxin that slows brain development in children."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaGrl Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. I am totally disappointed
by what I am reading about this lady. I was hoping for RFK. When are we going to start seriously looking into these chemicals we are injecting in our children? I have never been disappointed with an Obama appointee like how I am with this one. Many moms of special needs children including myself bought into this hope that we would see more care taken in the chemicals we are exposed to. I really hope it won't be business as usual. Many women voted for Sarah Palin because they bought into what she was saying about special needs. Please don't neglect our cry PE Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. God forbid that we should have policy based on SCIENCE rather than faith.
Because there's little to no science supporting the anti-vaccine hysteria. But that doesn't stop the gratuitous exaggeration and claims of persecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Have you never ever heard of Michael Belkin??
Perhaps not, but if you want science, check him out. His studies have been entered into the Congressional Record. He has done the due diligence providing the statistical end of it. He is a world class statistician, and his remarkable investigation into the risks posed by the hepatitis B vaccine have proven without any doubt, that an infant is put more at risk from the shots received from day one through to the end of the hepatitis vaccine series than would ever occur from the disease of hepatitis itself.

Anyway, the remarks of the pro-vaccine crowd prove my point exactly.

BTW, Belkins did not do this investigation because he has too much time on his hands. He did this investigation on account of his little daughter dying in his arms, during the routine adminsitration of this vaccine. His daughter was one of the majority of American children who had no chance, I mean, zero chance, of suffering from ill effects of the disease of hepatitis.

Check out also
www.coastalpost.com/02/07/05.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Was this study published in a peer review journal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. You do understand the mechanisms behind Peer Review right?
Edited on Tue Dec-16-08 04:19 PM by truedelphi
A Peer Review can be quite meaningful or absolutely meaningless.
Are the scientists on the same page. For example, if I have devoted my life to examining the melting temperatures of differing types of latex and their offshoots, and you too have spent time involved with latex products, your comments make sense regarding mypublished piece.

But when someone from the pesticide industry, who is being paid to say that such and such a product involves no significant health risks to children, goes and asks someone whose background is only in latex melting points - how does that constitute Peer Review? Yet today that is exactly the type of thing that is happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. No, but I looked him up.
http://www.whale.to/v/belkin.html

I like how he compares the CDC to Nazis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. A person who has lost their infant daughter to
Edited on Wed Dec-17-08 01:47 PM by truedelphi
THe FDA and CDC's horrible practices has every right to see these people as Fascists.

Belkin was not even able to get hte medical records from the doctor's office relating to the tragedy. Is that what happens in a free society or in a plutocracy??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Here's today's notice about Scientific Truth being manipulated
Edited on Tue Dec-16-08 01:53 PM by truedelphi
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3646569


Or read my posting about several other Truth manipulations here:
tinyurl.com/59g3ux

For accounts of yesterday's scientific truth manipulation, google "Aspartame" + Reagan.

Examine the L-tryptophan controversy that circa late 1980's, allowed 37 people to die from a 'rare' blood disease, Meanwhile the Corporate Media spun this as the food supplement being Bad Bad Bad, the truth behind the illness was that the L Tryptophan was grown on a GMO altered medium. Grow L Tryptophan on its usual culture and it is fine. Use the GMO stuff, and people are harmed and killed. But that fact never made it into the newspapers or TV's sixty second sound bytes. Yet to this day,. the GMO proponents say that GMO has never killed anyone.

WHEN CORPORATE AMERICA HAS CONTROL OVER THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM BECAUSE OF FUNDING THE LABORATORY AT ALMOST ALL UNIVERSITIES, WHEN CORPORATE AMERICA HAS CONTROL OVER THE MEDIA, AND ALSO OVER THE HALLS OF CONGRESS, HOW IS THERE ANY INDEPENDENT PEER REVIEW?

And what is worse is that PEER REVEIW is often a very corrupted buddy system. (In adition to all the factors stated above.) You review my company's work on genetically altered potatoes, even though all your really know about is the latex in tires, and I will help you get that appointment or promotion you need.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. It probably doesn't help the RFK was looking into stolen elections as well -
another issue that the powers that be seem to prefer to ignore.

Bobby might be seen as having a potentional to be a rabble rouser, and we can't have that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Science self-corrects by peer review.
Ideas that are found to be totally without merit or scientific backing tend to be looked down upon.

When somebody goes out of their way to champion ideas without merit or backing, there is even greater criticism.

That's just how it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Tell that to Warren Porter, tell that to Marc Lappe, tell that
To Michael Belkin, tell that to all the many others whose names I do not know.

One thing I do know, infants and children today have a rough time of it. How do we know who to blame for what? Record nuumbers of two year olds now have arthritis, and who do we blame?

Is it the formaldehyde and benzenes in the Glade air Fresheners. Or the Febreeze with its toxins? Or the alkyls in the lysol.

Or the fact that gas stations don't have gas station attendants, so pregnant womaen now gas up their own cars.

Is it bovine growth hormone, or GMO baby food? The hepatitis B vaccine given to one day olds as part of the "Healthy Baby Program?" Or maybe it is the melamine in the baby formula from China.

Here's a sad commentary on the very journal we used to be able to rely on:
www.coastalpost.com/02/07/05.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. OK. Are there any other cranks you'd like me to tell it too?
"One thing I do know, infants and children today have a rough time of it."

You should have seen how rough they had it before vaccines.

"Record nuumbers of two year olds now have arthritis, and who do we blame?"

I don't know. Chemtrails?

"Is it the formaldehyde and benzenes in the Glade air Fresheners. Or the Febreeze with its toxins? Or the alkyls in the lysol.

Or the fact that gas stations don't have gas station attendants, so pregnant womaen now gas up their own cars.

Is it bovine growth hormone, or GMO baby food? The hepatitis B vaccine given to one day olds as part of the "Healthy Baby Program?" Or maybe it is the melamine in the baby formula from China."

No.

"Here's a sad commentary on the very journal we used to be able to rely on:
www.coastalpost.com/02/07/05.htm "

That is a very sad commentary. Loony, poor-written, and riddled with conspiracy theories.

Very sad indeed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!!! TRUTH!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. "So it is likely that Kennedy was punished for his stand."
I sure hope so.

"When medical researchers realized that Reyes syndrome could injure and kill a young child with a fever who was given an aspirin, nobody began a campaign of doom against those medical professionals espousing this idea."

That's because there was evidence that aspirin actual caused this problem.

"But any time that somebody suggests that day old infants should not be given vaccines that person is ridiculed and blacklisted. "

Yes, because their is no evidence, and plenty of evidence that not vaccinating puts children in harm's way.

"RIP, Truth. YOur place in the scientific world has been replaced with the notion of Corporate loyalty."


Blah. Blah. Blah. Obama's birth certificate. Blah. Blah. Blah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why because she has critics? She also has people who praise her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. I understand that she was under budget constraints,
which is why her priority wasn't acted upon.

Have you researched that yet?

In the article you linked to, it also reads.....

Jackson's supporters ardently defend her record and place much of New Jersey's environmental problems on Gov. Corzine. They say that while Corzine has offered lofty rhetoric about environmental goals, he has not helped Jackson accomplish them. Jackson left the department to take a job as Corzine's chief of staff at the beginning of this month.

"Lisa Jackson has been forced to work without the resources or the leadership at the top to let her do what she wanted to do," says Amy Goldsmith, the state policy director for the New Jersey Environmental Federation. "Corzine just has different priorities, and if the leader isn't willing to lead, it is hard for somebody that's been appointed to take the reins."

Both Goldsmith and Tittel point to Jackson's work on climate change as an example of why she would make a great EPA chief.

Last year, Corzine signed the Global Warming Response Act, which aims to cut greenhouse gases in New Jersey 20 percent by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050.

"Lisa worked closely with the governor to champion this bill, and helped lobby the legislature to approve it," says Dena Mottola, executive director of Environment New Jersey.

But Ruch argues that the New Jersey environment department under Jackson's tenure failed to meet crucial deadlines for drafting procedures to actually implement the law.

"As a result, despite much ballyhoo, New Jersey does not have a coherent game-plan for achieving its climate change goals," Ruch wrote in a letter to President-elect Obama (PDF), opposing Jackson's nomination.

Again, New Jersey environmentalists come to Jackson's defense.

"No one worked more on this issue than my group, and if we thought missing that deadline was a huge concern we would have criticized it, and we didn't," says Mottola.

Eric Stiles, vice president for conservation at the New Jersey Audubon Society, said that while Jackson's record isn't perfect, she has always been receptive to his group's arguments and straightforward about her positions and the competing interests she was considering.

"She really took on some big issues and big battles and moved it forward in New Jersey," says Stiles. "Did she do everything I would have hoped for? No. But probably everything I would've hoped for was unreasonable."


It is Obama's vision and priorities on this that will count. I see her as doing the job required, not fighting it in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. anyone know what she did between her chem eng degree and NJ DEP?
wiki doesn't say; wondering if she was in industry?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_P._Jackson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. PEER are the only ones I have heard complaining about her.
Everyone else has had nothing but good things to say about her. Also, she had to work in NJ. That is no easy task. Nothing ever gets done in this state. Nothing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. I like her.
She seems to tangle reasonably well with those who would ban dihydrogen monoxide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dupe nt
Edited on Mon Dec-15-08 09:20 PM by babylonsister
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Background on Jackson:
Lisa P. Jackson

By DAVID KOCIENIEWSKI
Published: December 11, 2008


A series of profiles of potential members of the Obama administration.


Name: Lisa P. Jackson

Being Considered For: Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency

Would bring to the job: Twenty years of experience as an environmental regulator and a reputation as a consensus builder. Ms. Jackson, who is a chemical engineer, brought a more policy-driven approach to New Jersey’s historically politicized Department of Environmental Protection as its commissioner. During her 33 months in that job, the state began conducting compliance sweeps to crack down on polluters in environmentally ravaged sections of Camden and Paterson, ended its controversial bear hunt and unveiled a plan to reduce carbon emissions 20 percent by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050.

Is linked to Mr. Obama by: His transition team. Like her boss, Gov. Jon S. Corzine, Ms. Jackson supported Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton over Mr. Obama in the Democratic presidential primaries. Besides making a $1,000 donation to Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign in 2007, Ms. Jackson was an at-large delegate pledged to Mrs. Clinton; only later in 2008 did she donate $200 to the Obama campaign. Shortly after she was named Mr. Corzine’s chief of staff in late October — taking over on Dec. 1, becoming the first woman and first African American to hold the post — she was chosen by President-elect Obama in mid-November to serve on his transition panel for energy and the environment.

In her own words: “When it comes to the auto industry, the E.P.A. apparently is the Emissions Permissions Agency.” (Announcing in December 2007 that New Jersey would join other states in suing the Bush administration for its ruling that prevented states from enacting tougher fuel efficiency standards, a decision she called “a horrendous change of course.”)

Used to work as: An administrator in the federal Environmental Protection Agency for 16 years, where her duties included regulating the cleanup of hazardous waste sites under the Superfund program. She also ran various enforcement programs at both the E.P.A. and New Jersey’s Department of Environmental Protection, as well as New Jersey’s Land Use Management Program.

Carries as baggage: The E.P.A. criticized New Jersey in a recent report for moving too slowly to clean up some toxic waste sites. Some environmentalists also say she caved in to pressure from big business by supporting a plan that would privatize cleanup of hazardous waste sites, and from developers by diluting a proposal to enact stricter groundwater quality standards.

more...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/11/us/politics/11web-jackson.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC