|
Remember when people would post funny cartoons and cool pictures? New polls at midnight. Late night jokes. Or what crazy things were going on with Sarah Palin and gang.
I came here during the GE because it was a fun community that could disagree with each other on certain things but still be nice and light-hearted with each other. It was like how people would get along if they knew each in real life. People communicated as if they were speaking to each other's faces, not behind some anonymous username. I'm not sure if a bunch of new people came in or old people came back since I wasn't here before the GE or maybe people just changed after the election, but now it's just completely lost that quality. Now it's like every discussion ends up with someone calling people names or accusations racism, sexism, homophobia, etc as if your level of outrage must be inversely proportional to how bigoted you are. And this is completely puzzling to me because we're all Democrats/liberals/progressives here; I would wager that most people here agree on most major policies or at least agree on the philosophy. Is anyone here NOT pro-choice or pro-gay marriage? I personally haven't encountered anyone...
For the record, this isn't just about the Rick Warren issue. It's been progressing this way for a while now with the Caroline Kennedy threads and other stuff. The Warren thing is just the final straw. Anyone who tries to take a middle stance something immediately gets shouted down by the two sides. Again, I wasn't here during the primaries, but it seems like a lot of people are drudging up old primary talking points, which IMO was not a great time for Democrats. And this applies no matter who they supported in the primary. It was the case when the Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State issue was the front-page discussion when every little thing she said in the primary was used against her. And then with Caroline Kennedy, and this stuff. I purposely avoided primary discussions because I couldn't understand why Democrats, who pretty much agree on most major issues, were beating up on each other like it was Alien vs. Predator.
And sure, you could probably make the argument that I only liked it here during the GE because I was an Obama supporter. Fair enough. I probably am likely to have more faith in him because he was the guy I stuck with from the beginning. On the The West Wing, Josh Lyman was always criticized for being too devoted to Matt Santos and he said that it's different when you helped build someone up from nothing. I guess maybe that's how I feel about this. A year ago, we were told that we had no chance in hell and that we couldn't win a single primary, and to get to this point from nothing is kind of a big deal. Maybe that's why I'm having a hard time giving up on Obama before he even takes office. If Obama starts signing bad laws or starting dumb wars, I will absolutely be one to call him out on it, but all that's happened so far is that he's picked some subordinates and the inaugural show was decided.
It's perfectly fine to criticize Obama on things and disagree with others, but all I'm saying is, does it need to get so nasty and personal, and do we have to go back to the old primary attacks? In my view, I'm willing to give people a chance to actually do some work before I dismiss them outright. I wasn't a big fan of Hillary in the primaries, but I supported her nomination to be Secretary of State because I think she'll do a good job. And I'm perfectly willing to give her a chance to prove her abilities.
Anyways, sorry for the long post. Just some random thoughts. It's getting close to Oscar season though-- so I might have a new discussion topic until February.
|