|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Pale Blue Dot
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:29 AM Original message |
Let's list all the great things pragmatism has done for Democratic ideals in the last 28 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
1. Pragmaticism isn't a political philosophy. it's an approach, a way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:33 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Ok, so list the great things that approach has done for Democratic ideals over the past 28 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:38 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Here's an example of pragmaticism: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:39 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brazenly Liberal
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:23 AM Response to Reply #5 |
20. You and most of the world have vastly different definitions of pragmatism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:44 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. I have to run out, but let the record show that the BEST example you've given me so far, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 12:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
32. not a vermonter, are you? Bernie threw gun control advocates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 12:40 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:39 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. More. Brown v Board was a calculated and pragmatic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:40 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Hmm... I thought Brown vs. Board happened over 50 years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:45 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Yes and the current Supreme Court seems likely to engage in more profiles in courage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #4 |
29. Uhm, Brown v. Board was a Supreme Court Decision, not a political decision... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
7. Let me see what not standing on some principle has given us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:47 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. how about NAFTA? don't ask - don't tell? Patriot Act/DHS, the Iraq War? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:34 AM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Edward talked progressive but his senate record didn't reflect that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
8. 8 years of peace and prosperity, 1993-2001. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:45 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. It can be argued that Clinton took a pragmatic triangulating approach to acheive that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:46 AM Response to Reply #8 |
26. While BushInc was growing STRONGER for their return to WH - thanks to Bill deep-sixing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
10. Can you list great things Dems have done in the last 28yrs.? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 08:45 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. My argument is that Democrats have NOT done any great things because they were busy being pragmatic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:07 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. It's surprising to learn that people think pragmaticism is bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:42 AM Response to Reply #12 |
23. your argument has failed miserably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:44 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:47 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. #1, you don't have a factual cornerstone to support your argument... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
15. Domestic partnerships in Oregon was pragmatic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
16. Oh SNAP -- k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
18. You've listed too many things. I have a negative number. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
19. Easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:42 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. no raining on parades today! shhhh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
24. Tell me what manual you're pulling "Democratic Ideals" from. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. The point of my OP is that YOU tell ME. I didn't include any specifically. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:51 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. OK, there ARE no agreed upon "Democratic ideals." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomTan
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
31. Just out of curiosity, what's an alternative to pragmatism that you'd suggest? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GarbagemanLB
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
34. The new head of the party is a ruthless pragmatist, so you better get used to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeraldSquare212
![]() |
Fri Dec-19-08 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
35. NAFTA, Welfare reform, don't ask-don't tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC