Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Franken's lead dwindling...up 240 now...down from 285...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:21 PM
Original message
Franken's lead dwindling...up 240 now...down from 285...
He needs to be at 400 or so at the end of this challenge process or he won't make it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UnrepentantUnitarian Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...based upon...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Franken withdrew about 385 more challenges than Coleman...
So when those are counted Coleman will make up an additional 385 or so...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The withdrawn challenges have been counted

You could hear the board say "On the the withdrawn challenge I move that the ballot be designated to Franken (or Coleman"


All ballots where the only question was voter intent have been ruled on.


Now they are deciding on Blue and Green file ballots



Blue = challenged ballots without duplicates


Green = ballots with special circumstances


There are a lot more Blue than Green.



That should then leave only the improperly refused absentee ballots which are rumored to be about 1500
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No...those are challenges withdrawn since the beginning of the count...
By the canvas board. There are 5000+ that were withdrawn prior to this review that have yet to be counted...

Look here under the "Remaining" column

http://senaterecount.startribune.com/ballots/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Well, the Star Tribune has taken that into account with projection:
Ballot Challenge projection 2,981 3,245 507 0 1,211,916 1,211,992 Franken by 76


What is it you know that they don't? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I wasn't commenting on the projection...
I was commenting that Franken probably needed a certain # to overcome Coleman's probable lead in withdrawn challenges...

I don't know if they have completed the process of reviewing the challenges
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Coleman's challenges are mostly frivolous.
Your 385 number is pulled out of thin air.

Just because Coleman has more challenges standing does not mean that they are valid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. These are not challenges...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stargleamer Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. The 385 figure comes from here. . .
"I then have Franken losing a net of about 385 ballots once withdrawn challenges are processed, as Franken has more withdrawn challenges that Coleman, most of which are Coleman ballots. This would leave him with a small surplus."

<http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/12/franken-appears-likely-to-lead-after.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was just watching and Franken was at 250 when
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 04:26 PM by shraby
the board adjourned until Monday.
Please post your reasoning about having to lead by 400. Where did you get the figure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. 400 actually...
There are about 5000+ withdrawn challenges that have not yet been counted...

Those are going to favor COleman by about 385 (Franken withdrew more)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. You keep repeating this number that is not accurate.
Just because Coleman has 385 more challenges doesn't mean they will automatically be counted in his favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Not my count...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Nate Silver even said it was "fuzzy, fuzzy math".
I'm not sure guessing games are going to resolve anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. what do you base this number upon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. There are still 5000+ withdrawn challenges...
Those are going to favor Coleman by about 385. Franken withdrew more than COleman did...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Not necessarily.
If the rest of Coleman's challenges are as frivolous as his earlier challenges, he doesn't have a prayer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. One response was enough...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Apparently not.
Nate Silver admitted his math was beyond fuzzy and there's a good chance he's wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. You are acting like I want Franken to lose...
Nothing I have said is innaccurate...

chill out

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Not at all. It is simply a guessing game at this point.
Even Nate Silver admits it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Still plenty of ballots to be counted.
Edited on Fri Dec-19-08 04:52 PM by backscatter712
And now that we're through a bunch of them, I'd say that Nate Silver's and the Star Tribune's projections have likely been refined to the point where they're going to hold within a few votes.

Oh, and there's Franken's own worst-case-scenario projection that states that if all challenges were rejected, Franken would still be ahead by four votes.

Lookin' good for Franken (knock on wood...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
23. You are correct about old withdrawn challenges not yet been counted

Your 400 seems to be old data as the Star Tribune has added all of the withdrawn challenges back in (because they are withdrawn challenges the result is already known) and they conclude that he will end up with + 78 before the absentee ballots are counted.

It would seem that your basic approach is correct but that Franken stands to lose a net 173 when all of the other ballots are added together.

I am guessing that the difference between your figures and the Star Tribune's is an examination of the remaining "Blue and Green" file ballots.


There is actually no doubt as to the guidelines that the canvassing panel is using as the precedents on the different markings are well established and no longer controversial, so the Star Tribune numbers have to be considered the authentic source as they have copies of and have examined every ballot in question (and put them on their web site for anybody to see).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
24. Does anyone know if they'll start counting again on Monday?
.
.

We're pullin' for you Al.

~~~~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
25. Lots here have the story wrong
There are about 5,000 withdrawn challenge ballots which have not yet been counted. The canvassing board will start counting them on Monday and expect to finish by Tuesday.

There is no way to just guess which way they'll go because a challenge could be against a vote that was awarded to the opponent, in which case the withdrawn challenge would result in a vote for an opponent, or the challenge could be against a designation that the vote was for neither Franken or Coleman, in which case the vote would fall out of the count. The other guy having more remaining withdrawn challenge ballots doesn't insure anything.

Since the withdrawn challenge ballots are listed on the Minnesota Secretary of State's web page, it would be easy for anybody with the list of challenges and their original vote assignments to count the whole thing now. So far, nobody has bothered.

Al Franken says they've looked at it all and will win by 35-50 votes. But they obviously didn't count all the ballots, or they'd know whether it was 35 or 50.

Oh, and the Star Tribune projection everybody talks about, that's based on a unscientific survey of readers, not much more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Thanks for the info creeksneakers...
.
.

So Tuesday we should know much more than we do now.

Go Al Go! ~~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
27. I hope Al makes it. We truly need another progressive vote in the US Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC