Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Kennedy Jr. I read here a while back that Obama was going to pick him

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:20 PM
Original message
Robert Kennedy Jr. I read here a while back that Obama was going to pick him
for a position. It that still going to happen? Has anyone heard any more about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. What, and perpetuate a dynasty by appointing a Kennedy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Probably not with all the Caroline backlash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But, he does have all the credentials. He is over qualified for the job. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
45. **** FROM RFK Jr's own lips...****
I had the honor of hearing RFK Jr speak 2 weeks ago in Berkeley. Totally amazing man. He said he was not seeking any role in the Obama administration, or the NY Senate seat at this time because he has a couple small kids right now, and he wants to place them first.

(My thoughts: but who knows four years from now.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
4.  Yeah oddly a lot of "progressives'' attacked him as a kook and tree hugger.
Some of the "newbies said he was a "typical boomer kook". I don't recognize so called progressives sometimes. RFK has experience and is way more qualified for a number of positions than his cousin Caroline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He is brilliant. I honestly don't see how any progressive could have a beef with
him. I love listening to him on Ring of Fire and I was in awe of his speech at the Live Earth concert.

"See you at the barricade."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. The beef is that he jumped on board the 'vaccines cause autism' bandwagon
That position is, at best, poorly substantiated, but Kennedy's star-power gave it a lot of seeming credibility. Kennedy has done some excellent work re: mercury pollution from power plants etc., but he backed the wrong horse when it came to the vaccine "controversy." But if he were appointed to some cabinet post or named as head of the EPA, his ill-based views would have been given validation.


This has been discussed at length numerous times in various places here on DU, always with the same outcome: those who believe that vaccines cause autism attack those who point out that the evidence does not support the claim. The latter are then invariably decried as shills for Big Pharma.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
38. The claim is about the mercury used to preserve the vaccines, not the vaccines.
That's where you're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Oh please
That's like saying that the murder weapon was the bullet rather than the gun.

If the he claims that mercury (actually the Thimerosal) is in the vaccines (which he does), and if he says that the Thimerosal causes autism (which he does) then he is saying that the vaccines cause autism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #42
51. Let's just stick to the truth, like scientists do.
Edited on Sun Dec-21-08 12:16 AM by bottomtheweaver
To claim that RFK ever said that 'vaccines cause autism' is simply untrue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #51
56. Except the scientists whom you've decided are bought and paid for by Big Pharma, right?
Again, oh please.

Forgive me for not digging up a direct quote. However, in saying that Thimerosal causes autism, he is clearly implying that vaccines cause autism, because I can't think of another source of Thimerosal that might be relevant.

And your one-liners really don't deserve further comment; you have nothing new to bring to this discussion, which is in fact much more settled than you seem willing to accept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #56
59. No, he is saying that mercury causes autism. Why are you distorting his position?
I'm perplexed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #59
75. Which is it?
"Thimerosal causes autism" or "mercury causes autism?"

The two statements are not the same. And no shit you're perplexed; it's obvious from your every post on this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #75
80. Its the mercury in thimerosal, and you're just wasting my time. Bye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #80
83. Just like it's the sodium in table salt.
Since you're so concerned about wasting time, I'll tell you what: why don't you indicate in your subject line whether a given post by you is worth reading. So far you're running at about zero.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. My sense is that Bobby is happier being on the outside of government.
Given his family's history, who can blame him for thinking that serving in the Administration or the Senate is just not worth the tsuris?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. He took his name out n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. WTF? Are you sure? What a let down. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. No, he's out. And thank goodness.
This will be a pro-science administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. What does that mean?
You think Bobby is not pro-science? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. No, he's a pseudoscience kook.
Right up there with creationists and global warming deniers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. What specifically do you think he is kooky about?
He's got lots of opinions. Which ones do you believe are baseless?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VADem11 Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. The one position
that I've heard most often is his belief that autism is linked to vaccinations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. There's quite a bit of evidence that this is true. But, science paid for
by the industry that profited from the making of the vaccines says there is no link. Who are you going to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I'm not going to believe Kennedy, because on this position he's full of shit
And your fear-mongering is typical of the anti-vax crowd. Without exception, their first line of argument is always "drug companies bought and paid for the science." And usually they put science in scare quotes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Here's RFKJr's article
Fear-mongering, I'm not so sure. As with all good science, the debate continues. But, let me be the first kook here to say that I'm not so sure about injecting children with anything containing mercury.

And government coverups? I've seen my share.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/7395411/deadly_immunity/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. I've read it several times, thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. So what do you think about the mercury part?
And the fact that other professionals see enough empirical evidence to call for further research? What about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. No one could have imagined that mercury was a poison!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. How about the fact that mercury's been eliminated from most of the named vaccines
And in fact was never even in certain of them in the first place, but autism incidence still continue to rise?

How about the fact that autism is apparently on the rise even in countries that never used Thimerosal to begin with?


Sure, let's have more research. But let's avoid the fear-mongering that leads ill-informed but well-meaning parents to forego vaccination for their kids, thereby exposing those kids and others to a range of diseases that are far more dangerous than the Thimerosal that isn't even in them.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #43
52. How about some evidence?
Like links to support your claims?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #52
58. You first--you're on the side that's making the positive claim
That claim being that Thimerosal causes autism. Let's have your evidence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #58
62. Read on:
You seem not to want to discuss the article or the evidence:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/7395411/deadly_immunity/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. You are FULL OF SHIT. Why should anyone believe you? What proof do you have
except what the corrupt pharma giants dish out from studies they have bought and paid for! Talk about having a vested interest in the outcome! :puke:

Millions of parents are NOT wrong about what they have witnessed happen to their babies.

So which pharma giant do you work for? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Your idiocy is like clockwork
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Same back at ya!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. You left off the word "bogus". As in "there's quite a bit of bogus evidence"
Edited on Sat Dec-20-08 10:16 AM by Bucky
What the anti vaccination hysteria is guaranteed to do if it goes unchecked is reintroduce typhus, diptheria, & other deadly communicable diseases back into the US population by creating a large pool of young people crowded into schools where these diseases can thrive.

A little bogus concern about autism can lead to whole lot of real deaths by lowering our population's wall of protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
35. There is not "bogus" concern about the relationship between the vaccination
and autism. There is enough evidence to convince many medical professionals that further research is needed. I agree that safe vaccinations are necessary. I do not agree that a vaccine should be released prior to thorough research merely for the sake of recouping R&D costs to satisfy the stockholders. And I question the intent of the pharma lobbyists.

I've seen too many not to believe there is a possibility of a cover up. I don't trust our government. No matter who is at the helm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Even the vaccines cause crowd will say it's the quality, non-organic aspect often.
I think it's tough for the body to withstand that kind of assault, early, without having built anti-bodies, and come out unphased.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. The vaccine issue.
There could be other issues, he's been known to associate with some really wacky people.

But his record on vaccines is pure quackery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. You mean the mercury-based preservative issue.
Please get it straight for once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. Yeah! Just like table salt is based on sodium and chlorine
We need to get this dangerous substance out of American homes immediately!!!!!!!!!!!1!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #46
53. Let's stick to the issue, which is thimerosal, not table salt, okay?
Edited on Sun Dec-21-08 12:17 AM by bottomtheweaver
Thanks! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #53
55. Well, which is it? Mercury, or Thimerosal?
And if it's mercury, which form of mercury?

Are you saying that all forms and all alloys of mercury are created equal? And are you saying also that Thimerosal is equal to all of them, too?

Perhaps if you understood the sodium chloride comment, you'd understand why it's relevant.


Careful with your water, by the way--it contains hydrogen and oxygen, both of which are proven unambiguously to be very dangerous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. Read on:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #57
60. What grade are you in?
Is that the best you can do? One liners and redundant links?

You're a 100% generic anti-vaxer.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. I'm sorry that I exposed the inaccuracy of your claims.
Try to be a good sport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #61
66. Where did you do that?
All I saw was you reposting Kennedy's screwball article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #66
69. You're claiming that Kennedy links vaccines to autism. He doesn't.
He links the mercury in thimerosal to autism. Your claims are simply distortions, and that is clear from just the title his Rolling Stone article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #69
71. Are you out of your mind?
Name another source of Thimerosal, aside from vaccines. If you can't, then you are equivocating; claiming that Thimerosal is linked to autism when there is no environmental source of Thimerosal exposure other than vaccines is the same as claiming that vaccines are linked to Thimerosal.

If you can't see that, then you're in no position to judge the validity of RFK's article. Or anything else on this subject, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #71
74. You are making an appallingly dishonest claim.
I'm really kind of shocked that you would. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #74
76. Clarify please, unless you're just calling me out
I made a statement of fact whereby I dismantled the dubious crux of your dubious "argument." The best you can do is another nonsensical one-liner.

I wish I could say that I'm "kind of shocked that you would."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #76
89. You claim in post #15 that RFK "jumped on board the 'vaccines cause autism' bandwagon."
However, what RFK makes clear in his article is that the mercury in thimerasol, a preservative used in vaccines, has been linked to autism -- not the vaccines themselves. So your claim is a serious distortion of his position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #69
73. If you were correct...
Kennedy wouldn't be rallying against vaccines which contained no mercury. He rallies against vaccines that do no contain mercury. Therefore you are incorrect.

You'd think if Kennedy were concerned about mercury, he'd be complaining about fish, which contain mercury, instead of vaccines that don't contain mercury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #73
78. He's exposing the dangers of thimerosal, period.
But go ahead and pretend he's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #78
84. He's pseudoscientifically fear-mongering. Period.
Edited on Sun Dec-21-08 12:45 AM by Hanse
And helping the spread of life-threatening diseases like measles.

He's the moral and intellectual equivalent of those religious figures who discourage the use of condoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #84
85. At least he's honest. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #85
88. Actually, no. He's incredibly intellectually dishonest.
He claims, for example, that thimerosal is a poison. Technically true. But he fails to mention that it's not a poison at small doses.

Which brings us back to the point of NaCl. NaCl is a poison and at large doses it can kill you. At low doses it's perfectly safe and rather tasty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #88
90. Oh the irony. Anyway, thanks for a good laugh. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. Bullshit. And you think we should believe you-an annoymous poster on a message board?
:wtf:

I'll go with Kennedy any day. And not only that but an overwhelming majority of parents of Autistic children witnessed a distinct before and after when vaccines where given. Your word means nothing. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. Feel free to look it up yourself.
Believing people because they have a famous last name isn't a very good idea.

"And not only that but an overwhelming majority of parents of Autistic children witnessed a distinct before and after when vaccines where given."

You're just making that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
48. Do some research about parents of Autistic children & then try & say I'm making it up.
You are so full of shit it ain't funny. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. The research has been done and it's well established.
Vaccines don't cause autism. No matter how hard some people wish they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #50
95. Get an F-in clue! It is the Mercury in the preservative causing the problem!
Also, the research you refer to is total bullshit bought & paid for by the pharma giants who have a vested interest in this.

There will never be proper studies done until the pharma giants stop controlling the U.S. government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #48
91. even if true, it's not very good evidence
That might happen only because autism happens to manifest at about the same time as vaccines are typically given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #91
92. Bill, the issue is not vaccines, but the mercury used to preserve them.
There's an awful lot of distortion here masquerading as truth, but the fact is that RFK accused the pharma companies of adulterating their vaccines with a serious poison, mercury-based thimerasol, and the government of helping them cover it up.

His article is well worth a read and very convincing:

"Deadly Immunity:
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. investigates the government cover-up of a mercury/autism scandal"

by ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.
Posted Jun 20, 2005

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/7395411/deadly_immunity/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
26. "Kook" is a word I keep up in the attic to be trotted out in service of
characterizations of ANTI-Science members of the Republican Party generally and the Bush administration especially.

Any good number of law firms pointedly seek attorneys familiar with, unafraid of, and effective in scientific principles, not the least of these The Environment.

RFK Jr. is a pro-Knowledge, pro-Science guy. We need far more of these folks, not fewer.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. I don't give pseudoscience a pass just because a democrat does it.
"Any good number of law firms pointedly seek attorneys familiar with, unafraid of, and effective in scientific principles, not the least of these The Environment. "

Successful law firms would want to avoid hiring people with poor rational thinking skills if they want to remain successful. Same thing goes for successful presidential administrations, which is why I'm glad Obama didn't hire the kook.

"RFK Jr. is a pro-Knowledge, pro-Science guy"

The weight of evidence contradicts this statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. You're doing it every time you pretend he has a beef with "vaccines."
He has a beef with the mercury-based preservatives they're adulterated with, not the vaccines themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #39
49. Except he's against vaccines which contain no mercury.
How now, brown cow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. Incorrect: "a mercury-based preservative in the vaccines -- thimerosal --
appeared to be responsible for a dramatic increase in autism and a host of other neurological disorders among children."

-- "Deadly Immunity: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. investigates the government cover-up of a mercury/autism scandal"

by ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR., Rolling Stone, Posted Jun 20, 2005

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/7395411/deadly_immunity/
..............

To claim repeatedly that RFK is opposed to vaccines is an astonishing distortion of what he actually wrote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #54
63. From the same article..."
"Before 1989, American preschoolers received eleven vaccinations -- for polio, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and measles-mumps-rubella. A decade later, thanks to federal recommendations, children were receiving a total of twenty-two immunizations by the time they reached first grade."

That right there is anti-vaccine fear-mongering. The MMR vaccine, for example, has never thimerosal.

If claims of a government cover-up is also loony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #63
65. I'm sorry, but your claim is ridiculous. Read the subtitle of the article:
"Robert F. Kennedy Jr. investigates the government cover-up of a mercury/autism scandal."

That's "mercury/autism," not "vaccine/autism." The point is obviously that multiple vaccinations multiply the quantities of the mercury they're adulterated with.

Seriously, why are you trying so hard to distort his position?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #65
70. MMR vaccines contain no mercury.
"The point is obviously that multiple vaccinations multiply the quantities of the mercury they're adulterated with. "

Not if they don't contain mercury they don't.

"Seriously, why are you trying so hard to distort his position?"

It's not my fault Kennedy can't keep his own story straight. That's a problem when you keep making things up, you can't keep it straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #70
72. The article is obviously about thimerasol. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #72
77. Yet MMR vaccines contain no thimerosal.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #77
79. Neither does vanilla fudge, but the article is about thimerosal.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #79
81. Kennedy hasn't said vanilla fudge causes autism.
Although I wouldn't put it past him to make that claim.

He has claimed MMR vaccines cause autism.

And he also claims vaccines with thimerosal cause autism. Which science has conclusively shown they don't cause autism.

I don't think science has proven that vanilla fudge doesn't cause autism. Maybe we should ban vanilla fudge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #81
82. Please cite sources for your claims, thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #82
86. What's amazing is that if I called you a dumb-ass (which I haven't done) MY post would be deleted
Edited on Sun Dec-21-08 12:47 AM by Orrex
Yet you're free to post all of your piffle as if it made any sort of rational sense at all.

What a crazy world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #82
87. No.
I'm not going to prove that global warming is happening with a global warming denier.

I'm not going to prove that evolution happened to a creationist.

I'm not going to prove that the holocaust happened to a holocaust denier.

I'm not going to prove that thimerosal doesn't cause autism to an anti-vaccer.

If you're interested in the truth, you're perfectly capable of looking itself up yourself. But I don't think you're interested in playing the truth as much as you want to play games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
47. We disagree. You've made a bad call on a good man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #47
64. There's no room for disagreement, Kennedy is demonstrably wrong.
He's either a despicably dishonest man, or a foolish man, either way he shouldn't be given an important job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #64
68. Your claims about his position on vaccines are demonstrably wrong
Edited on Sun Dec-21-08 01:10 AM by bottomtheweaver
and I've just demonstrated why. You're welcome. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #64
93. Jesus God, Hanse. You are totally out to lunch on this one.
"A despicably dishonest man" ?

Shame on ya.

And he already HAS an important job. Actually, he has MORE than one important job, and many people I personally know are the better off for it. The longer he serves in ANY job, the better.

I have no idea why your personal bias should drive you to be so dismissive of a DEMONSTRABLY accomplished fellow citizen like RFK Jr. But it isn't very persuasive.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
98. No he's not.
that's just a ridiculous comparison. Having said that, he does not have the scientific background that I'd like to see in someone appointed to a post where scientific knowledge is vital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
21. RFK Jr. is just a peach. I hope he continues to serve, as he has for
so long already, in any capacity.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. I hope he is wise enough
to never have to become a "recovering politician." He will be much more effective outside. He is hugely influential, and like Al, without the reins of politics, I can kick some ass and take names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
23. Obama is making a HUGE mistake, but obviously not the first one lately. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
44. RFK took his name out of the running
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
27. He didn't make it through the media spanking machine
which is pretty frisky as you can see. If Caroline makes it through hers, she can help him get appointed to something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
29. he's not right wing enough for Obama.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
30. Perhaps he can kiss up to Hillary for a job since he loves her so much. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
34. There was talk about him at EPA, but he made a statement about...
...having six mouths to feed and not wanting a gov't job ~ I don't know if he had heard Obama wanted someone else, or if he really didn't want to be considered. I really admire him for the work he's done though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #34
67. **** FROM RFK Jr's own lips...**** **** FROM RFK Jr's own lips...****
**** FROM RFK Jr's own lips...****

I had the honor of hearing RFK Jr speak 2 weeks ago in Berkeley. Totally amazing man. He said he was not seeking any role in the Obama administration, or the NY Senate seat at this time because he has a couple small kids right now, and he wants to place them first.

(My thoughts: but who knows four years from now.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
94. There you go spoiling some perfectly lovely anti-Obama rants with the facts.
That's just not allowed here, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #94
96. Really
What the fuck has happened to this place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
97. I read where it was to be the EPA but Kennedy opted to stay in the private sector
Kennedy can probably achieve more without the limits of government but staying outside of a government position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC