|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 12:56 PM Original message |
Why DADT will be repealed within a few months |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. Obama apparently said it won't be until 2010 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hulklogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 01:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I don't even believe 2010. It will take an act of congress to change it, and who knows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. Don't hold your breath. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. DADT is my lowest priority on GLBT issues, but worth eliminating just the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
5. Excellent idea on the commission, Cali. But I disagree slightly on one point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
6. it will take an act of congress to end it, won't it? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. Why DADT won't be repealed: Rick Warren supports it, and... (drum roll, please) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
8. Even though you've said all kinds of nasty things to me, I agree 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. did you read sfexpat's post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I did and you'd probably be surprised that I agree with most of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 13th 2025, 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC