|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
deadlyaj (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 06:51 PM Original message |
NEWSFLASH: OBAMA HAS BEEN AGAINST GAY MARRIAGE FROM THE START |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. Did he equate gay marriage with pedophilia? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadlyaj (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. warren is a fundie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 06:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Nobody here claimed Obama was for gay marriage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
34. Whatr on earth makes you think that? Because they voted for him anyway, like we heteros begged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
2. There is a difference between being "against gay marriage" and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadlyaj (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 06:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Obama doesnt equal Warren |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
28. anyone who thinks that is the issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-22-08 12:14 AM Response to Reply #2 |
54. guess what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
6. Obama was also against Prop 8 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
7. Or he's been playing politics with the issue - either way, it's up to us... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadlyaj (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 06:59 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Hes been against gay marriage from the start of his run for prez |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. What I mean is, he may not actually be against it, but for political purposes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
35. And? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
8. The only candidate who was FOR gay marriage was Dennis Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadlyaj (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Why didnt the LBGT Community express their support for him as fervant as the anti warren stuff.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Damned if I know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. They DID, you dolt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadlyaj (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Obama isnt anti gay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. No shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadlyaj (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. he is a bigot, yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:15 PM Response to Reply #20 |
38. You could not be more wrong. Next. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:21 PM Response to Reply #20 |
41. {"Must suck to be be used like that, but reality sucks" -- so speaks the Republican for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-22-08 02:01 AM Response to Reply #20 |
56. Oh, we're going to support Obama in the end eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
43. I may have misread, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
37. You knew he was going to pick Warren to give the invocation? Huh. I didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
46. Why don't some stright people attack Warren as firmly as they defend his invite? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. I still voted for him. One of the main reasons, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
11. nonononononononononononono no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadlyaj (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Obama believes in civil unions not right to marry. dont mix words, two totally dif things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. what the hell do you know about it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:19 PM Response to Reply #21 |
40. Sadly, I think you are mistaken. However, it does not matter what he thinks, as long as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. You are incorrect sir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadlyaj (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Obama Pride |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. what a crock of shit. a pride group named after somebody |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadlyaj (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Its there lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:15 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. He will not allow legislation preventing it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. Here's another example for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:24 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. Marriage is an issue for the states, not the feds. Further, Presidents don't legislate. Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:49 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. Repeal of DOMA is for the Feds and PE Obama promised it's repeal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 09:27 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. Agreed. But the feds should never have touched marriage in the first place, just as they should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 11:42 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. The problem with bad laws and half measures like CU's is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 09:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
49. How about abortion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-22-08 02:04 AM Response to Reply #49 |
58. People who are pro-choice support laws that let the individual decide. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doc03 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
25. Warren is going to talk for 2 1/2 minutes, the last |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chascarrillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
27. NEWSFLASH: IT STILL PISSES ME OFF. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
29. No news there. Obama and Biden are for equivalent rights but not calling it marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trashcanistanista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:05 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Not true. He was against prop 8 and said so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:52 PM Response to Reply #29 |
48. "I detest the bashing and vilifying of gays" - Barrack Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
32. Thanks for the condescension. And your point is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
give-me-liberty (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
33. OBAMA is wrong on Gay Marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HarukaTheTrophyWife (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
36. Awesome! Republican for Obama is back! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
39. OMG - WE'RE BEING INVADED BY AOL USERS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadlyaj (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:35 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. sorry, just a little sick of all this outrage about Warren. It missed the mark on the whole scope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
45. NEWSFLASH: OBAMA WAS AGAINST HATE8 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trashcanistanista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. Correct. Thank you. How many times does this need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-21-08 11:36 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Apparently infinitely. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPisEvil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-22-08 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
55. You would think a constitutional scholar would understand the 14th Amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-22-08 02:03 AM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Politician first, scholar second. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-22-08 09:25 AM Response to Reply #55 |
59. maybe what he doesn't understand is homosexuality . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC