Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whoa! Anybody watching Mike Rogers on Hardball?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:25 PM
Original message
Whoa! Anybody watching Mike Rogers on Hardball?
This guy is kicking ass! He says the Warren has directed Saddleback Church to change "divisive" language on his website. Claiming a victory for the gay community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. I just saw that! Do you think this was a deal worked out between Warren and Obama?
I was wondering what Obama's end game was here and I think we're seeing it.

That was fast, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. All those of little faith.....
:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I don't know. I say probably not. I think Warren felt the heat.
He really is going for that Billy Graham spot and his name was getting a bit scuffed up because of this. How long has it been? Five days? Amazing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I think if a person isn't a total asshole they will feel bad that their words hurt so many people.
He seems more ignorant then cruel. I could be wrong but I hope not. He may not have realized how cruel the comparisons he made were to gay people. He knows now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I won't give him a complete pass yet. Let's hear what he has to say at the inaugural.
No text becasue we really don't know yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:55 PM
Original message
I agree but he isn't going to talk about anything like that in his prayer at the inaugural.
Edited on Mon Dec-22-08 05:58 PM by Pirate Smile
That would truly be nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. Well, who knows? We don't and that was demonstrated today so
we really and truly have to wait and see, don't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Good point about the comparisons
He will probably lay of those in the future, at least. I really doubt he will compare gays to child molesters after this. He might even take it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I think he has to do more than that, IMHO...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who was the black pastor? defending Warren's bigotry. That was really a stretch. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. He's the MSNBC staff pastor, Eugene Rivers. He's not all that good
He has been defending Obama and Warren since this thing started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. I always thought of him as quite RW. They had him on during the Wright stuff to
bash Wright and Obama.

He definitely tilts to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Contessa Brewer raked him over the coals this morning
And he got kind of rude with her, annoyed that she dared ask about the feelings of the gay community. He seemed highly disturbed to find we have feelings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. He Was So Rude & Condescending to Mike Rogers
calling him Mr. Rogers, laughing, mocking, shaking his head .... referred to gays as "his crew" to Mike Rogers. Rivers was a total asswipe today.

I thought Mike did a great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. He was awesome!!! He's is a great spokesperson for the marraige equality..
movement. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well that's certainly a silver lining.
Maybe this whole dustup will actually help change the evangelical mindset RE: gay issues. That would be very cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Found his blog
http://www.blogactive.com/

Turns out this guy is a famous "outer". He's known for finding out who's gay and outs them. Like John McCain's Chief of Staff before the election LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Yes, we must see what is done, not just what is said. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. Mike only outs people who are hypocritical --
those who are anti-gay publicly, but are actually gay themselves(see "Larry Craig" and his ilk).

Mike's a friend of mine and I called him after the show to tell him he did a great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. Changing some "divisive" language on his website won't mean that he is no longer a bigot.
I am sure that Warren has not changed his views on gay rights one iota. They felt the heat and changed a few words on the website, but such action is of little consequence until they actually change some of their bigoted policies, and don't hold your breath on that one. It won't be a victory for the gay community unless Warren is removed from the inauguration program altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Exactly
It's one thing to remove the blatant bigoted language from his website, entirely another to stop acting like a bigot, preach bigotry from his pulpit, and support political bigotry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. He probably won't ever change his views
And I highly doubt that he'll be removed. That would be worse for Obama than keeping him.

I don't know if it was a victory or not, he said it was. The main thing is that he was an excellent debater and destroyed the minister on there. I've been reading too much DU. He made a better case in five minutes than DUers bashing Obama have in a week.

Still, it's more than I expected, especially this fast. It may not be the last thing he does either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I really think Obama demanded this in return for the inaugural invocation.
I don't mean to make this sound squalid and horrible. I think he meant to say to Warren that he had to cleanup his act and if he didn't, he wouldn't have a place at the table.

It remains to be seen whether this will work all the way. It has worked so far, that's all....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alwysdrunk Donating Member (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. You may be right. I've always thought that Obama chose Warren for this long ago
I think that Obama made his mind up about this way before it was announced. Maybe even before the election. And really, Warren isn't officially the new Billy Graham yet. Maybe Obama said he would treat him like Billy Graham, but he has to do certain things Obama wants to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. yeah, I'm always doubtful that these occurrances just "happen". I think they are orchestrated.
I love Obama and what he stands for, but I always doubted that he would just take Warren at his word and not demand something in return.

Peace be unto you. We shall see this come to pass in an interesting way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. But it's a start. ;-) NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. One step at a time...
...and this is a step in the right direction.

Sure, he may still hate, but at least he's not preaching it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
22. Good job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdpeters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. Thanks for the heads-up. I just caught the re-broadcast.
You're right. Mike Rogers did a great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
24. That reverend made me ashamed......
as he was pompous and off putting, IMO. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. He was the same way during the Rev. Wright stuff. He spoke out against him and
against Obama staying in his church for 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yes! He declared victory for getting Warren to change his website and for getting that
reverend guy to "defend" the choice of Warren. So even if Warren DIDN'T change his views on homosexuality, and of course he didn't, his MESSAGE is changing to a more accepting one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
28. I always thought Warren would be more influenced by Obama...
...than the other way around.

I'm glad Warren is cleaning up his website. At least he'll be keeping his hate to himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
32. I saw the later showing
Mike did an amazing job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
34. Anti-gay bigotry is only one facet of Warren's dominion theology
The facet that shows because of the convergence of gay marriage in general, Prop 8, and Warren's profile in a watershed election year (regardless of the future). Palin's church scrubbed much too.

California was cluster bomber with pro Prop 8 robo-calls days before the election with a snipp

I do not think the change in website was a "victory" but rather a run to the shadows.

Frankly -- as an older heterosexual non-Believer white male in CA -- I do not get why Obama threw Wright under the bus for Warren when Wright was excluded for rhetorical and cultural style with fine substance if one looked at his sermons in context while Warren represents the theocratic segment of the USA that plots covert infiltration of politcs and government instuitutions and is free of taxation. Sure Warren fights against AIDS in Africa but it is by abstention programs and people are evangelized concurrently.

I would be impressed by a Christian that suggested their institution be taxed and could deliver social services without evangelism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hellataz Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
35. See This was part of Obama's plan, he has an end game i tell you
You can't neglect, attack or ignore the hateful or ignorant. You need to take a different approach if you want change. Barack knows this and we're already seeing results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Saddleback (and what a name is that for a fundie church?) just "sanitized" its site since
it was getting noticed and linked to. It's public relations, not substance. It's just part of Warren's pose as a "moderate" when he's no such thing.

The ideology hasn't changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
36. Does Changing the Language Equate to Changing the Policy?
you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Yes, but we liberals don't like hate speech directed at gays or anybody.
So when the speech is moderated or muffled we should be glad about it. What he personally believes is another matter. We can hope to change his mind but absent that we must see a cessation of hate speech as a good thing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC