Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How about all DUers chip in to buy a box of straws for Chuck

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 04:43 PM
Original message
How about all DUers chip in to buy a box of straws for Chuck
Todd to continue grasp at as he and the rest of the corporate media struggle to keep Blagogate alive. I just watched Chuck and Contessa desperately trying to find even a scintilla of evidence that will allow them to continue to bloviate about pseudo issues designed to erode public confidence in Obama. Needless to say they failed by any rational standard. Not that this will stop them from their mindless theorizing. What a sad state "journalism" has fallen to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. A box of
straws :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Seriously, I saw it too and it was pretty pathetic how hard they tried to keep this non-story alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SuperTrouper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I love it!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
7.  Barnicle was on next and he was worse. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah, I saw that too. They will try to drag this BS out for weeks,
if not months.

Oh no, Barnicle's at it again now, with different talking heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great idea to actually SEND it to him/them;
MIGHT get their attention!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. YESSS. Word for word as you wrote it. Anybody have an email address for Chuck and Andrea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. well its not like there's anything else of importance that could be reported on

Holy Shit 'W' has driven the economy off the cliff and headed for the worst recession in 80 years



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5.  No, It was that dirty Chuck Shumer who did this to us. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. I thought you were going to say
because he sucks.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11.  Another worthy punch line. Thanks. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. heh
I'm glad that I'm missing the faux outrage about the report on tv. Also, just got my Newsweek, and in it Isikoff has a "If I had Subpeona power: five questions for Obama", and one of the questions is "Will you promise to leave Fitzgerald alone", and guarantee that he "face no impediments to completing his investigation in the justice department". WTF...first of all, Obama had said BEFORE all of this that he was keeping him. And also, Obama is following Fitz's requests, which the media is mad at him for...and Michael implies with this question that somehow, Obama would prevent the investigation? Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
12.  Isikoff was one of the favored RW outlets in the impeachment
charade. I didn't like him then, I didn't like him even when he would report negative stories on W and I will not like him in the future when he will again be a prime purveyor of GOP lies and innuendo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. If you look under a rock and find nothing there
does that mean that there is really nothing there? Or can we continue to speculate on what was under the rock before it was lifted? I'm not sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. Not to wrry theres plenty where that came from
We also have the warren thing and of course every single cabinet pick that is in some way flawed. Apparently since getting elected Obama cant do anything right. Didn't you get the memo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. Straws=perfect
We should also send a large crate to Free Republic, it is Yule tide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC