Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Be Good

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 03:57 PM
Original message
Barack Be Good
And FTR, I see no problem with the Obamas renting a luxurious vacation home. They required the seclusion imo, and after the past year, deserved it. I'd ask Mr. Krugman what should they have rented that would be more in keeping with the current economic climate that would also provide the needed security?


http://www.commondreams.org/view/2008/12/26-7

Published on Friday, December 26, 2008 by The New York Times
Barack Be Good

by Paul Krugman

snip//

First, the administration of the economic recovery plan has to be squeaky clean. Purely economic considerations might suggest cutting a few corners in the interest of getting stimulus moving quickly, but the politics of the situation dictates great care in how money is spent. And enforcement is crucial: inspectors general have to be strong and independent, and whistle-blowers have to be rewarded, not punished as they were in the Bush years.

Second, the plan has to be really, truly pork-free. Vice President-elect Joseph Biden recently promised that the plan "will not become a Christmas tree"; the new administration needs to deliver on that promise.

Finally, the Obama administration and Democrats in general need to do everything they can to build an F.D.R.-like bond with the public. Never mind Mr. Obama's current high standing in the polls based on public hopes that he'll succeed. He needs a solid base of support that will remain even when things aren't going well.

And I have to say that Democrats are off to a bad start on that front. The attempted coronation of Caroline Kennedy as senator plays right into 40 years of conservative propaganda denouncing "liberal elites." And surely I wasn't the only person who winced at reports about the luxurious beach house the Obamas have rented, not because there's anything wrong with the first family-elect having a nice vacation, but because symbolism matters, and these weren't the images we should be seeing when millions of Americans are terrified about their finances.

O.K., these are early days. But that's precisely the point. Fixing the economy is going to take time, and the Obama team needs to be thinking now, when hopes are high, about how to accumulate and preserve enough political capital to see the job through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. We've been getting fucked over for eight years on our dime
but they complain about where the Obama family goes for vacation using their own dime. These people are crazy but I guess we better get used to it. Somebody will take issue with everything he does.


:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. The security detail bill would have been much more expensive had they
tried to stay at the Holiday Inn in Orlando or Myrtle Beach. On top of that, everyone would be trying to catch a glimpse of the family and they really need this last week of "normalcy" before they hit D.C. and then they have 4 hopefully 8yrs of extreme public scrutiny. Besides, we all understand he's from Hawaii and he's renting for a week with a couple of close family friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. They also fail to consider his grandmother passing away and only
now being able to have a memorial for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, there's that as well. He's also gone over to work out with the troops and
spend some time with them. Much better than Bush's few phone calls to some soldier's families in his comfy Bush manner. No one talks about the Bush expense on that fake ranch in Texas or the "family bunker" the evil clan hangs out at throughout the year or the many homes they own dotted around the country. No one spoke of how much money the Bush family spends or how many vacation days he's taken over the years. He doesn't work at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Krugman is reverting to his primary-caliber snark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes, IMNSHO, 'tis true
I won't allow myself to forget how Krugman shilled "shamelessly prostituted himself" for the challenger and trashed Obama ... disrespected Obama almost as much as the "illustrious" retired general Clark and all around henchman, Lanny Davis. :eyes:

FWIW - Although I profound respect his high intelligence and lauded gift of The Nobel Prize in Economics, I must also keep a wary eye on the MOTIVES of ---> one each, Paul Krugman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yes, and that's puzzling considering he's been 'in communication' with Obama...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree that this is a very important point that needs to be upheld.
Edited on Fri Dec-26-08 05:14 PM by midnight
Finally, the Obama administration and Democrats in general need to do everything they can to build an F.D.R.-like bond with the public. Never mind Mr. Obama's current high standing in the polls based on public hopes that he'll succeed. He needs a solid base of support that will remain even when things aren't going well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes, but Paul Krugman is hardly "the humble messenger" to be conveying such truisms.
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC