Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think that IL Governor Rod Blagoivich signalled his intent to try to destroy Obama today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Politics_Guy25 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:14 PM
Original message
I think that IL Governor Rod Blagoivich signalled his intent to try to destroy Obama today
I think by this news that his lawyer wants Rahm Emmanuel and Valerie Jarrett to be forced to testify before the IL House impeachment panel is an indication that Blago really intends to go down with all guns firing and to try to take down as many people as he can with him. I think he probably wants to take the president-elect down. Why else would he make this move? Jonathan Alter told Keith on countdown the night that this broke that he thought Blago would make up stuff to try to take the new administration down.

Well, here we go. The only answer is for the impeachment to proceed ASAP and get this jerk out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think you're right
I honestly don't know what making them testify will do for him, and I imagine the testimony will only exonerate Obama et a.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politics_Guy25 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think what it is is throwing the kitchen sink
Trying to divert attention away from him, trying to spread the mud, trying to take the heat off of him, etc.

Hate the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. It may exonerate EVERYONE.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. But CAN he is the question.....
.... the general concensus I've heard pundits say all day is that Blago et al are gonna be laughed out of hearing room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Money talks......
I wouldn't doubt anything he would do in order to pocket some change. He doesn't care about "saving face"....he will take anybody through the mud for the right offer.

:tinfoilhat:

I thought about this the other day. Blago has been slimy for years. Suddenly when it comes to the senate seat issue he gets busted. For the right offer he will say he met Michelle at Walgreens to discuss some kind of deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politics_Guy25 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. fired, that is what worries me
what Blago tries to sell Fitzgerald to avoid jailtime himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think he'll try anything but I don't think he'll be successful. I just
hate that it diverts attention from other stuff the transition team needs to be working on. He's such a little jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. it's firing across the bow
trying to ward off the prosecution, kid of a "I'll take you with me" sort of warning.

It only matters if Obama/Emmanual/Jarrett have done anything wrong. I doubt they have since Blago calling Obama a motherf*cker and was shopping for deals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. No, he is just trying to muddy the waters as to his own culpability
US Attorney Office has beaucoup recordings of Blago indicting himself. What Blago's attorney is doing is standard defense tactic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. He's making the mud puddle bigger, on hopes he will get lost in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. They did it for LEGAL reasons;
don't read too much into such tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. any decent defense lawyer would demand this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scubadude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. There is so much political infighting in this state...
that we will probably never know what the "real" truth is. Illinois has a great history of political corruption. Blagojevich has many foes within the state, especially the father/daughter team of Mike and Lisa Madigan.

Mike Madigan is a Dem Speaker of the Illinois House of Reps for the last 25 years or so with his adopted daughter Lisa Madigan currently serving as Illinois Attorney General. It has been long know that they aspire to have Lisa as either Governor or a Senator, and have been beating on Blagojevich since he became Governor. Lisa is also a know friend of Obama's.

Add to that the fact that the Governorship of Illinois is one of the Crown Jewels of American politics, with a plethora of Republicans chomping at the bit to discredit any Dem they can, especially the Governor, the last of who, George Ryan, a Republican, is doing time right now...

Even though the state votes solidly for most Dem presidential candidates of late, over the last 108 years or so there have been 12 Republican Governors vs 8 for the Dems with the Republicans in office the vast majority of time holding office over 70 of the last 108 or so years.

Also add to the above a solidly Republican leaning Chicago Tribune, the largest newspaper in the state. Obama was the FIRST Dem they have ever endorsed in the papers 147 years or so...

Blagojevich may be guilty or not. In my eyes he is innocent until proven guilty. Note how Patrick Fitzgerald is using the press as an axe here whereas during his stint as Special Counsel he meticulously kept his distance.

There is much more than meets the eye here. Illinois has provided a Democratic President, now the scrambling for the political crumbs begins in earnest.

Scuba
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. MADIGAN has been a big political name in Ill for a while, eh?
Heard of Kim? Cousin or something? Interesting that Lisa adopted; she LOOKS perfect!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scubadude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. No, I am not familiar with Kim.
Edited on Fri Dec-26-08 07:53 PM by scubadude
I'm not knocking the Madigans per se. Right or wrong there has been a feud going on between Mike Madigan and Blagojevich for years. Many here may not know this.

Also note how many who cried out against the media's support of the Bush administration are eating up the attacks on Blagojevich from that same media.

Makes you wonder if anyone has learned anything about the media during the last 8 years?

What I have learned is they are right leaning and aren't necessarily on the lookout for the stories that are true,
but rather look for the stories that pay, true or not.

Scuba

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. 'Juicy' stories, that's it.
Before Mike there was someone else, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scubadude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. I'm not following you. I am not close enough nor do I care to track
rumor if that's what your getting to, but if you have more than that please elaborate.

Scuba
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I hate and do not track rumors;
my point is that media is mostly interested in 'hot,' 'sexy' so-called news. Much of msm trends right 'cause that's who owns them, too. Really tired of this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scubadude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. Yes, exactly.
They give you what you want. That is if your a typical on the surface type. Even many intellectual folks are misled by "framing". You place something into a package which gives one meaning when the reality is something else entirely. An example would be the "intelligence" Bush is so fond of saying was wrong. The fact is that he "framed" the intelligence message given to the public, but now he claims it was wrong. At the time they got the idea they wanted across, in big huge letters with sexy packaging pounded out 24/7. Sorry we don't buy the lies...

Scuba
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. You have a very good sence of the situation. There are several other important news papers in
Illinois which are owned and operated by Republicans. These papers are just as viscious as Faux news. And a person would be a damned fool as to believe that the constant noise that these news papers puts out does not have a large effect on the public opinion in Illinios.

Like you, I don't know whether Blago is innocent or not. But at the same time, I can easily see how a Democratic Governor could be set up and sent away in Illinois. The political environment there is worse than toxic, for the reasons that you posted, and then some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scubadude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Thanks for the compliment, I try to pay attention at a distance.
Our history over about the last 40 years has taught me that the media cannot be trusted. You'll get a bit of what is going on but if you follow too close you'll get what they're selling, not the real picture.

The longstanding Republican rule of the state has provided some interesting and ironic prizes for industry. For instance Illinois supplies much of the midwest and east with electrical power. Republican Governors have set up a regulatory environment here were all the power companies have to do to get a power plant built is show a need at any time. A brownout during the hottest day of the year is enough. The people of the state are required to pay for these power plants.

Going back over 40 years this has meant that the power companies (who supported Obama heavily in his run for Illinois Senate) have built many expensive plants here. The requirement that the Illinois populace pay for them has given us some of the highest rates in the country. Here's the ironic part; much of the electricity generated by these plants is sold to other states at much lower cost. We pay for the construction of the plants that sell much of their the power to other states...

In effect the largely Republican built regulatory environment of Illinois has created a very lucrative environment for power companies at the expense of the people of the state.

Republican run newspapers and other businesses realize this type of political environment really helps their cause further attempts to tilt the environment even further.

The Dems got back a little with the conviction of Ryan, but this is just too big a cash cow for the Republicans to ignore.

As you noted there are many other factors in this fairly politically complicated state.

Scuba
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColesCountyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. It won't work.
Fitzgerald has already stated publicly that Obama, et al, have n-o-t-h-i-n-g to do with this, an extraordinary thing for a prosecutor to do.

Blago is just throwing sh*t at the wall and hoping that something sticks-- which this won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. It takes a special kinda stupid to purposely piss off the next POTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. He can't destroy Obama.
EVen before all this happened, his approval ratings were really low and none of his colleagues liked him. He has no credibility, he's the poster boy for sleeze, he doesn't even have an innocent wife we can all feel sorry for. All he can do is dig himself deeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. What? He wants Rahm and Valerie to testifiy to exonerate him.
they will both say there was no deal making going on...at least not in conversations with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. I think you're right that he's
trying to. And unfortunately the press is all too ready to keep chirping about Blago and his charges. At the very least, it's an attempt to tarnish Obama's image before he even takes office.

Most of the MSM has moved on from the Rick Warren issue, but they won't let go of this, because it has that delicious hint of "scandal" which they love to cover. No matter how peripheral Obama and his people are to the whole controversy.

Meanwhile, Illinois needs to have a new Senator, legitimately chosen, and it looks like that's on hold indefinitely. Arghhh!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's time to snuff Blago out politically
He indeed did ask for it... start the train and let's run over the fuckhead.

Rod Blagojevich has a 10% or less approval rating with the people of Illinois. He is nuclear politically. What does want to do? He needs to resign immediately or expect the train to run over him shortly.

There is no link to Obama with Rod Blagojevich. That should obviously be front and center. What's unfair to the people of Illinois is that they have an embarrassing governor who can't lead at this point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #19
38. you love mob shows, ha
"snuff Blago out", "start the train and let's run over the fuckhead", "expect the train to run over him shortly".


I am sick they let him stay this long as gov. It's sickening - they've got him on audio tapes saying he wants paid for the seat? How easy does it get to say this guy needs impeached, ya know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. So let him
Emmanuel and Jarrett did nothing wrong. So there is no way in hell Blago can take anybody down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. Leave Blago alone....more power to him fight fight fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #23
37. LEAVE BLAGO ALOOONE! He's a HUMAN! He's not WELL RIGHT NOW!!!!!
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. I don't think so. It tells me that Blago never tried to negotiate with Obama's staff for that
Senate seat. Obama's report says they had no inappropriate conversations with Blago regarding this matter.

If that is true, then that also tells me that Blago may very well be innocent of the charges. The only way that he could prove this is to call Obama's people to the stand to testify to this fact.

Not everything has unholy motivations behind it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Blago could be innocent of charges from Rahm and others but
there are other potential candidates that he may have tried to shake down. If I were betting I wouldn't bet against Fitzgerald, he would not have done this if he didn't have enough evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
26. He's a rank amateur, which is what got him into to trouble, and it won't save him now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onefreespiritedchick Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
29. I cannot stand Blago
I wish they kick his arse out of office pronto. He is nothing but pure scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
33. Blago is toast
:)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
35. Perhaps not
If he never specifically asked them for a bribe, he may simply want them to take the stand and say so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
36. Blago is done. Guy is guilty as sin and the evidence proves it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
39. Emmanuel and Jarrett were not involved in "deal making". Blago's lawyer needs them to say that
it exonerates his client...at least in those two cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
40. Blago has only ever thought about himself and his amibition,
ask his estranged father-in-law, Richard Mell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC