Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Boxer's letter asking Sen. Kerry to hold a hearing on the use of torture

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 08:04 PM
Original message
Sen. Boxer's letter asking Sen. Kerry to hold a hearing on the use of torture
December 19, 2008

The Honorable John Kerry
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
304 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator Kerry:

I would like to extend my warm congratulations on your designation as the incoming Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. I have enjoyed working with you on the Committee for the last decade and look forward to a challenging year ahead as we work with President-elect Obama to set a new course for our nation.

I write today to raise an issue of the utmost significance -- the Administration’s use of torture against detainees held in U.S. custody. Despite widespread condemnation from Members of Congress, policy experts, and human rights advocates, Vice President Richard Cheney stated in a recent interview with ABC News that the torture policies used against detainees were appropriate and admitted that he played a role in their authorization. In fact, when asked if any of the tactics -- including waterboarding -- went too far, he responded with a curt “I don’t.”

I find Vice President Cheney’s response deplorable, particularly in light of a recent report released by the Senate Armed Services Committee following an eighteen-month investigation. In sum, the bipartisan report found that “senior officials in the United States government solicited information on how to use aggressive techniques, redefined the law to create the appearance of their legality, and authorized their use against detainees.” The report, led by Senate Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin, concluded that “those efforts damaged our ability to collect accurate intelligence that could save lives, strengthened the hand of our enemies, and compromised our moral authority.” I fully support Chairman Levin’s proposal for an outside Commission with subpoena power to investigate this matter further.

In light of this report and Vice President Cheney’s admission that torture was approved at the highest levels, I ask that you hold a hearing on the use of torture and its impact on U.S. moral standing in the world. The last eight years have been a dark chapter for U.S. global leadership and have left a deep stain on our moral authority. Now is the time to send a clear and nequivocal sign that we completely reject torture, that we respect the rule of law, and that America will once again lead on human rights through the power of our example.

Thank you for your consideration of this request..

Sincerely,

Barbara Boxer
United States Senator

link




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Beautiful news! rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hot stuff! Go, Sens Boxer and Kerry. Rec'd. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. wouldn't that be nice.
America will once again lead on human rights through the power of our example.

let's just hope that this is not one of those- let's look like we are doing something- hearings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PearliePoo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. ShootEmInTheFace is a diabolical prick..........
(apologies to all decent pricks out there)

You just know that if there is a SFRC hearing on the use of torture by these fiends, the results and recommendations of the committee will be met by a sarcastic "So?", accompanied by a middle finger salute and a sneering "Go fuck yourself" for good measure.
And then what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Cheney will not be in office after Jan. 20. This hearing will be conducted during an Obama
administration. The point is to make it clear that torture is immoral and illegal.

Cheney can continue to curse up a storm, but there may be some surprises in store for him.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PearliePoo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Maybe they can yank the bastard from his "undisclosed location".
I would love to see if his ticker can take what he so cavalierly dishes out.
(you know, just a little splash of water in the face...just some frat-boy hazing stuff......NOT!)
He TORTURED in our name. The world will be watching.
There's going to be some "must see" TV on CSPAN and I, for one, will be tuned in.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kerry will do a complete job with this assignment. And even if bush pardens cheney
maybe the hague will come after him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. I wonder what happens..
with criminal investigations like this when an administration is no longer in power. Is there a special prosecutor selected? Are all state secrets still bound by classification? What role does Congress play in the prosecution, or the accumulation and disseminating of information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. How I hope these hearings are held.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sens Boxer and Kerry were some of the few to vote against
The Military Commissions bill on 9/28/06. This awful bill authorized torture, did away with the protections of habeas corpus for some and did other awful things.

This was the record of that vote: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00259">US Senate vote on 9/28/06

Sen. Kerry particpated in that debate in the Senate and argued for an end to torture:

The President said he agreed with Senator McCain's antitorture provisions in the Detainee Treatment Act. Yet he issued a signing statement reserving the right to ignore them. Are we supposed to trust that word?

He says flatly that ``The United States does not torture ,'' but then he tries to push the Congress into allowing him to do exactly that. And even here he has promised to submit his interpretations of the Geneva Conventions to the Federal Register. Yet his Press Secretary announced that the administration may not need to comply with that requirement. And we are supposed to trust that?

Obviously, another significant problem with this bill is the unconstitutional limitation of the writ of habeas corpus. It is extraordinary to me that in 2 hours, and a few minutes of a vote, the Senate has done away with something as specific as habeas corpus, of which the Constitution says: ``he Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.''

Well, we are not in a rebellion, nor are we being invaded. Thus, we do not have the constitutional power to suspend the writ. And I believe the Court will ultimately find it unconstitutional.

The United States needs to retain its moral authority to win the war on terror. We all want to win it. We all want to stop terrorist attacks. But we need to do it keeping faith with our values and the Constitution of the United States.

Mr. President, a veteran of the Iraq War whom I know, Paul Rieckhoff, wrote something the other day that every Senator ought to think about as they wrestle with this bill. He wrote that he was taught at Fort Benning, GA, about the importance of the Geneva Conventions. He didn't know what it meant until he arrived in Baghdad. Paul wrote:

America's moral integrity was the single most important weapon my platoon had on the streets of Iraq. It saved innumerable lives, encouraged cooperation with our allies and deterred Iraqis from joining the growing insurgency. But those days are over. America's moral standing has eroded, thanks to its flawed rationale for war and scandals like Abu Ghraib, Guantánamo and Haditha. The last thing we can afford now is to leave Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions open to reinterpretation, as President Bush proposed to do and can still do under the compromise bill that emerged last week.


We each need to ask ourselves, in the rush to find a ``compromise'' we can all embrace, are we strengthening America's moral authority or eroding it? Are we on the sides of the thousands of Paul Rieckhoffs in uniform today, or are we making their mission harder and even worse, putting them in greater danger if they are captured?

Paul writes eloquently:

If America continues to erode the meaning of the Geneva Conventions, we will cede the ground upon which to prosecute dictators and warlords. We will also become unable to protect our troops if they are perceived as being no more bound by the rule of law than dictators and warlords themselves. The question facing America is not whether to continue fighting our enemies in Iraq and beyond but how to do it best. My soldiers and I learned the hard way that policy at the point of a gun cannot, by itself, create democracy. The success of America's fight against terrorism depends more on the strength of its moral integrity than on troop numbers in Iraq or the flexibility of interrogation options.


Maybe the new chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee might listen to the distinguished Senator from California and agree to hold the hearing she requested. Maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Thanks for posting. Here's a clip:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. I wish we had more senators like her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Excellent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. It must be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. I LOVE my senator, Barbara Boxer. She stands up when no one else ...
Edited on Sat Dec-27-08 01:37 PM by YvonneCa
...will. I saw her speak with Senator Kerry when they came to Pasadena (scene of the botched joke incident). I thank her for this.

I want there to be hearings...for two reasons:

1) The American people need to understand what was done and know clearly WHO made the decisions to do it. We also need to understand that it hurts US as a country, when something is done that goes against our basic values as a people.

2) There needs to be accountability. I think the difficulty in having public hearings lies in this second reason. Different people want different kinds of accountability...all the way from "GWB and his Administration were only trying to protect us, so it's all okay" to "GWB and his Administration planned this on purpose and we should try them for war crimes." Personally, I am somewhere in that vast middle ground.

IF hearings were to be held, I can think of no one more suited to chair them than John Kerry. He is a patriot. He has fought his whole life for the values of our democracy and our Constitution. He embodies 'Truth to Power.' Chosen or not...it is his legacy.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. She's terrific. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC