Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Total Friggin Nuttery - Dick Cheney's role next Tuesday with regard to Roland Burris

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 11:34 PM
Original message
Total Friggin Nuttery - Dick Cheney's role next Tuesday with regard to Roland Burris
Edited on Fri Jan-02-09 11:35 PM by redstate_democrat

If Burris appears at the Capitol with his certification signed by Blagojevich and White, the officials said, Burris would be permitted on the Senate floor.

Vice President Dick Cheney, as president of the Senate, would then ask whether anyone objects to the senators-elect being duly sworn. A Democrat would object and propose that Burris' credentials be referred to the Rules Committee for an investigation. If no one objects to that motion, the credentials go to the panel for a period of perhaps 90 days.

In the meantime, Burris gets the privileges of an unsworn senator-elect. The Senate's unofficial customs and traditions leave unclear whether that status would come with a pay check, but Burris could be accorded a stipend for staff and given office space. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090103/ap_on_go_co/senate_burris


So, wait a minute. Dick Cheney will ask whether or not someone objects to Burris being seated and a DEMOCRAT will step forward and block him?

But, this same DEMOCRAT could not stand up to the corruption of Dick Cheney? Does anyone even realize the imagery this will project?

I will be watching to see which Democrat actually responds to Dick Cheney and objects to Burris. This will be truly something to behold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well....duuuuuuuuuuuuuh. Who the fuck else would do it?
Until the Inauguration, Dick Cheney, like it or not is the "Go Fuck Yourself, Pat Leahy" President of the Senate.

That's how the game is played.

There's no imagery, here. Impeachment was always the option of the Congress (starts in the House, trial in the Senate). The Congress didn't choose to exercise that option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes, I realize that Darth Vader is the prez of the senate
I didn't think that far ahead until I read the article. Then I just saw this picture in my mind of Dick Cheney standing there with that fucking SMIRK on his face as Democrats push this old man out on the street. They will opt to push an old man out on the street, but not remove a criminal from the White House. And I guess Congress will end on that fucking note - kicking a Dem to the curb while bowing to the criminals in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah, it sucks. But Congress is complicit in Cheney's many "successes."
They let him roll on, and didn't stand up, once, to him. They played the Quid Pro Quo game, while keeping the old dumb base (on both sides) "outraged" and "riled."

I sometimes wonder if they all, left, right and center, don't go out on Thursday night and get shitfaced and laugh at us for giving a damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not gonna happen. Stop. White won't sign, this will be protracted. And FUCK Cheney. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Any Lieberman wannabees left in the Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sorry not gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC