Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richardson to withdraw as Commerce secretary (Updated w/Obama statement)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:20 PM
Original message
Richardson to withdraw as Commerce secretary (Updated w/Obama statement)
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 02:11 PM by ProSense

Richardson to withdraw as Commerce secretary

The New Mexico governor cites pending investigation of business dealings

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, tapped in December by President-elect Barack Obama to serve as secretary of Commerce, has withdrawn his name for the position, citing a pending investigation into a company that has done business with his state.

"Let me say unequivocally that I and my Administration have acted properly in all matters and that this investigation will bear out that fact," he said Sunday in a report by NBC News. "But I have concluded that the ongoing investigation also would have forced an untenable delay in the confirmation process."

He said he plans to continue in his role as governor. "I appreciate the confidence President-elect Obama has shown in me, and value our friendship and working partnership. I told him that I am eager to serve in the future in any way he deems useful. And like all Americans, I pray for his success and the success of our beloved country."


Obama's statement:

It is with deep regret that I accept Governor Bill Richardson's decision to withdraw his name for nomination as the next Secretary of Commerce.Governor Richardson is an outstanding public servant and would have brought to the job of Commerce Secretary and our economic team great insights accumulated through an extraordinary career in federal and state office. It is a measure of his willingness to put the nation first that he has removed himself as a candidate for the Cabinet in order to avoid any delay in filling this important economic post at this critical time. Although we must move quickly to fill the void left by Governor Richardson's decision, I look forward to his future service to our country and in my administration.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. So why are ever much dirtier Reeps still in their jobs?
Hmmmm......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good. Hate to see him go, but we don't need the distraction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am really sorry to hear this...
He's a good man, and an intelligent one...

But I think, given the current situation he's in, that this is a very smart move, both for him and for Obama...


Damn.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. What company?
If it's enough to cause him to withdraw, I'd like to know more.

I wonder how this will play with those who were unhappy that Obama did not include MORE hispanics in his cabinet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. here you go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. Interesting.
So is this an authentic example of "pay to play?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Richardson says no
Edited on Sun Jan-04-09 01:54 PM by merh


Whatever it is, the investigation will complicate his confirmation process.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I hope not.
Richardson is one of the few centrists I have any respect for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. I've never trusted him
He took jobs on the boards of oil corporations after he served as Energy Secretary. One of the corps is run by a very dirty group of folks connected to the PNAC bunch.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Richardson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. My take is pretty narrow.
He was one of 3 of the original pack of primary candidates, none of whom made it past January, that got education right.

I'm a teacher, and that was important enough for me to place him higher on my personal ranking.

That, and I thought he was better on Iraq than most.

Those are 2 issues, though, and don't reflect his entire record.

Thanks for the info!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. He has strong points
but once I realized he sat on the boards of major oil corps after being Energy Secretary I lost any trust I had in him. I realize that people have to work after serving but that just doesn't sit well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. You are correct.
That doesn't sit well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Will he grow his beard back now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. I've got to admit. It looked sexy on him. ;-) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Talk about taking one for the team...
with Blago/Burris et al, he figures Obama doesn't need ANY more dirt, even if its just a handful.

Good man, sad to see him go, maybe in 2012!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sounds like a rat that's been caught.. that statement sounds a lot like
a repug that gets caught with his pants down in some unusual place. He wouldn't have resigned if it doesn't mean its going to get nasty... AND you know what, I don't care... I don't care which side of the aisle you sit; if you are a crook and a scumbag, you need to go down. I just wish it went both ways much better.. hopefully, Obama will fix that. The days of govt officials being corrupt and above the law have got to be over in order for us to rebuild this nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. I like him but I'm glad he's good enough to step away if whatever
he's being investigated for will cause a distraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is so disappointing
I think Richardson is making the right move for the sake of the Obama administration, but, I think he would have excellent in this position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why.....Some sort of FBI investigation into pay to play donor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yikes...is this as out of the blue as it seems to me?
What happened to the vaunted Obama vetting process?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Doesn't work so well
if the participants aren't 100% honest I guess. He may have mentioned this and perhaps at the time they didn't think it would be that much of a big. I guess it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Makes me wonder about Hillary.
Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. Of course it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #38
51. Was there any doubt?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebubula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #26
49. Pray tell...
...WHY?

Do you REALLY think that Mrs. Clinton is going to resign or is under investigation?

Or are you simply positing (in a VERY Nixon-ian manner) this because of your dislike for the future SOS?

I would guess the latter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. MSM already out with the BS. "This is MAJOR BLOW to Obama" lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. lol. Who said that?
Well, this gives them something new to chew on. Whatevs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. The anchor on MSNBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. (I meant, which one).
I just turned it on and forget what this one's name was. Was curious if it was the anchor or one of the pundits. Yeah, they'll be going crazy over this this week. Even the Blago thing was starting to bore them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. The really cute blonde. The one, that use to be a model
I don't know her name
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. DKOS has more...
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/1/4/1314/34429/291/680076

here's a Washington Post article on the controversy from December:

A federal grand jury is investigating whether a financial firm improperly won more than $1.4 million in work for the state of New Mexico shortly after making contributions to political action committees of Gov. Bill Richardson (D).

The probe focuses on whether the governor's office urged a state agency to hire CDR Financial Products. The probe is in a highly active stage at a time when President-elect Barack Obama has chosen Richardson as his nominee for secretary of commerce, according to two sources familiar with the investigation.

In the New Mexico case, the FBI and federal prosecutors are investigating how CDR, based in Beverly Hills, Calif., won lucrative fees from the New Mexico Finance Authority in 2004 soon after donating $100,000 to two Richardson organizations.

..............

From 2003 to 2004, CDR Financial gave $75,000 to Sí Se Puede, which paid for expenses at the Democratic National Convention in 2004. CDR's president and founder, David Rubin, also gave $25,000 to Moving America Forward, which funded Richardson's efforts to register Hispanic and American Indian voters.

Rubin was generous to Obama's campaign as well, giving $29,000 to help elect the senator to the White House. Yesterday, the Obama transition office declined to comment on the development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Sounds pretty standard to me, unless we should look into the actions
of Bush Co and Haliburton, KBR, or Blackwater.. this is rather normal fair.. looks like the Bush admin is going after Dems for what they do themselves. Hopefully, with Obama in charge, everyone will be held to the same standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Well I'd like it if this sort of thing was very unusual.
I hope it will be soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Me too, then we can get the fascist grip off our country and give a fair
shake to real democracy and human interest instead of corrupt, oops I mean corporate interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onefreespiritedchick Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. Breaking news on MSNBC.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. like anything in current american politics the sleazy underbelly will appear soon
in the form of yet another conservative piece of crooked shit as the next contender for the position-i'm shocked i tell ya i'm shocked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
19. crazy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. This really stinks. Richardson would have done very well.
But I understand his decision, and respect him for getting out of the way so he isn't a distraction.

Your day will come, Governor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
41. There are many reasons Richardson wouldn't have passed the vetting.
I am amazed the other stuff didn't surface earlier. I like the guy but he would have been a PR disaster. He makes Cisneros look like an "angel".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. The country's loss is
New Mexico's gain. Gov Richardson doesn't want to jeopardize anything and is thinking of the Obama Biden Team getting off to the best start possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
27. Why the fuck is it
that Democrats get caught with their hand in the cookie jar at inconvenient times, and Repubs only get cought when its pardon time?

Better yet... Why the fuck cant politicians keep their shit on the straight and narrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. No, both sides are corrupt. We have to own up to this and CLEAN up our own party.
I really like Bill Richardson, the man, but we can't make excuses for him. If this was not SERIOUS he would have remained in contention.

I hope he's proven "not guilty" but it was his personal call to withdraw from consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. MSNBC pundit offered Harold Ford Jr as a possible candidate


I think that is a great choice - then we would never have to hear that stupid SOB speak again, no one cares what the Commerce Secretary is saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brooklyns_Finest Donating Member (747 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
33. He is oing the right thing eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
36. But Blago's the Big Villian, right?
At least there IS a Grand Jury in the Richardson case...:eyes;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
37. As usual, the kneejerkers on DU are ready to convict Richardson and throw away the key based on an
allegation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. Yeah, some do.
Why is that? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
39. Too bad I think he would have done a good job. However
he is doing the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
42. After this blows over, he'll make a great special envoy to the Middle East.
Just wait until Hillary finds out. Eat your heart out, James "Judas" Carville.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
45. That is a shame. I really like Richardson.
But I suppose this is better than an ugly lengthy confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #45
50. me2 - he was my first choice before O - sad news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gblady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
52. Classy statement....
as usual, from O.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
53. There were always doubts about Richardson
When he was being considered for the Obama VP slot, folks were saying "the problem with Richardson is that he doesn't vet well" without being specific, and there was talk about women who are not his wife. Looks as if there may be other issues as well. I hope he stays on in New Mexico, as he should still have a bright career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC