|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
SuperTrouper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:10 PM Original message |
Pat Buchanan: Burris is a US Senator, Blago did his duty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. Reid is right in not seating him, the SOS of IL is out of bounds here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yep... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. I don't know about the "great job" part, but he's probably right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. You have a good point. Reid just wants to buy time for IL politicians to impeach Blago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. Reid had nothing to do with what happened today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Give it up already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Oh, the SOS is corrupt now, not Blago? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Thanks for reading my post. ...Jeeesh, wtf is going on ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 04:18 PM Response to Reply #13 |
46. Why the "Jeeesh"? You did call him corrupt in your post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 04:33 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. The poster said "not blago" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 04:36 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Or maybe it's just your nice friendly way of addressing people ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 04:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
47. Doesn't anybody notice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
6. Republicans want an easy target for 2010 and they want to cause strife. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
8. I hate it when I agree with Patrick J Buchanan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Research more and you won't. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still Sensible (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 02:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
39. I do, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. Wrong. He cannot be seated until his appointment is certified by the IL SoS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Papers do matter. Tweety just quoted "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still Sensible (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:46 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Why is political capital being expended on this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. They may be trying to avoid having an unelectable incumbent running for reelection in 2010 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still Sensible (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I've heard that argument, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Unelectable because he was appointed by Blago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sallyseven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
29. It is not a silly bull shit issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
32. If things turn out as I think they will, Reid is creating political capital. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apnu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:44 PM Response to Reply #17 |
34. Reid only has a backbone when standing up to Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. True. SoS is the problem here; he should have been certified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SuperTrouper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 03:04 PM Response to Reply #28 |
43. Blago just double dared all Dems with his Burris pick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #28 |
50. the SOS is following his conscience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apnu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:44 PM Response to Reply #12 |
33. Untrue, this is an appointment and not an election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:55 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. (15 ILCS 305/5) (from Ch. 124, par. 5) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apnu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:57 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Wow, you're right, I'm wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVnRT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
15. The right wing desperately wants this man seated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still Sensible (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:51 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:39 PM Response to Reply #18 |
30. No, actually if things turn out the way I hope they turn out it will benefit Democrats. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
19. The truth is Blago has the Law on his side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olkaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:59 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. The truth is that he doesn't have time on his side. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:09 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. But if Pat Quinn made an appointment, it might turn out Blago's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olkaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. I don't see that happening. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:46 PM Response to Reply #21 |
35. The problem is his impeacment and removal would not nullify the actions he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olkaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 02:39 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. Not convinced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
20. I agree with Buchanan when he said the Illinois SOS does not have veto power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
25. Govs usually appoint |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sallyseven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
27. Does anyone really care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
37. Buchanan also thought Palin would help McCain win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JayMusgrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 02:56 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Exactly, Pat B is a former Nixon speech writer.........not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
42. please do not qoute pat buchanan as an authority on anything.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cash_thatswhatiwant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
44. Pat wants Republicans to be able to run on corruption and someone appointed by a corrupt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-06-09 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
45. Why the shocked face? Burris would guarantee that seat goes Republican next election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC