Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama economic team, key lawmaker work to redo financial bailout and shift Bush course

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 03:08 AM
Original message
Obama economic team, key lawmaker work to redo financial bailout and shift Bush course
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/sns-ap-financial-bailout,0,5513528.story

WASHINGTON (AP) — Barack Obama's economic team is talking with the Bush administration about having Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson ask Congress within the next week for access to the $350 billion remaining in the financial bailout fund, officials on both sides said Friday.

A request by Paulson would allow Obama to begin tapping the fund — the last half of a $700 billion rescue package authorized by Congress in October — promptly after his Jan. 20 inauguration.

Obama's transition team also has asked Neel Kashkari, the head of the rescue program at the Treasury Department, to stay on for "a couple of weeks" under the new Obama administration to ensure a smooth transition, an Obama official said.

Paulson has said for a number of weeks that he has been having talks with the Obama team on when a request should be presented to Congress seeking the second $350 billion. He has said that the decision on timing has been left up to the incoming administration.



"They're the decision-maker here," Paulson said in a response to a question after a speech Wednesday.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why the heck is Obama asking anyone from Treasury to stay on after what they did with the previous
Edited on Sat Jan-10-09 04:00 AM by w4rma
$350 BILLION?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 04:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Calm down, it's just for the transition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. The "shift in course" part is encouraging....
This is from further down in the article:

Eager to shift the course of the government's financial sector bailout fund, Obama and congressional Democrats want a more defined mission for the beleaguered $700 billion rescue program. The House could act as early as next week on a new tack for the Troubled Asset Relief Program that would set tougher conditions on recipients of the money, including limits on executive pay, and require the Treasury Department to use some of the money to reduce mortgage foreclosures.

At the same time, Obama's selection for treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, is broadening the program's goals, aiming to unfreeze credit for homeowners, consumers, small businesses and local governments. Geithner and Obama's economic team are developing a "comprehensive set of investment principles" that would also embrace restrictions on how the money is spent, limits on executive compensation for fund recipients and a plan to address rising foreclosures, an Obama transition official said.
========

I am surprised these conditions and goals were not part of the original package. They all sound reasonable and rather obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. unfreezing credit for small businesses needs to happen sooner
then later. These funds need to be released. My husband works for a small company and these people are already talking pay cuts. I need them to not have any excuse. The money needs to be released. We know the first portion vanished into thin air....I don't think the same thing will happen with this portion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. How about another method of getting money to small buisness instead of through for-profit banks?(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. hey....that's something to think about.
How would they do it? If loans came straight from the government wouldn't we run the risk of some private organization running the program and then looting the money in executive compensation.....oh wait..the banks did that too.

I dunno....thinking you have a good point though. I'm starting to bang my head against the wall!!
Outsourcing of our jobs led us here and now this company may not be able to meet payroll! fuck fuck fuck!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC