Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Obama against Gay Marriage?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:13 PM
Original message
Poll question: Is Obama against Gay Marriage?
And, don't tell me what he said. Tell me what you think he actually believes.

There is NO doubt in my mind that by the end of his Presidency he will make a strong push for gay marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. We have nothing to go on but what he said during the campaign.
Both primary season and the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. You're right. I have no proof; actually just the opposite, but...
I think he is smarter than any single person on DU. I think he knows that it could have destroyed his campaign for the Presidency, and coming out against it was the only way to keep the media and Republicans from talking about it. I trust that he really is for gay marriage, and will come out for it only when the time is right.

Not one of his actions, including the Warren pick, show Obama to be a homophobe... to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. We must believe!
Let us pray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yes...
Hopefully this was just a bunch of triangulating. He was very forceful in his support of gay marriage back in the 1990's. It's definitely true that he wanted to keep the Presidential campaign away from social issues because that's how the Republicans get their base entirely fired up. Bush wouldn't have won in '04 without the social issues. Obama wanted things to stay focused on the Iraq War and the economy. Those are universally accepted "fuck ups" by the Bush administration amongst, you know, 80% of the public except for the idiotic 20 percenters that worship Bush. Hopefully Obama will stop triangulating and take a damn stand. I do believe he is for full gay rights though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Wow.
We must keep the faith that he was just lying when he said that tradition and his personal religious beliefs let him to the conclusion that marriage was between a man and a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. How long have you've been following politics?
You can't be that naive to believe that politicians, at least the ones that want to get elected, have to sometimes "lie".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Then I will continue to pray that he was flat-out lying just to get elected.
O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Back in the 1990's he supported it...
when he was campaigning for the Illinois legislature. But he has triangulated big time and now claims that he doesn't support it. I hope that was just a bunch of BS to get elected and once he gets in, he'll do something to stand up for civil rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spectral Music Donating Member (349 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Triangulation always ends up screwing the progressives.
Disappointed and getting more so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Agreed...
It sucks. But there is a sliver of hope based on how forceful he was back then. I think that is where his heart truly is. Sadly it's considered a political landmine to take a stand nationally on this issue. 50 years from now people will look back on homophobes the same way that we currently look at racists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spectral Music Donating Member (349 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I hope your right, because right now we are political punching bags
And I am sick and tired of the welts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. Okay, so let's say that he chose to come out for gay marriage before the election and lost.
Edited on Mon Jan-19-09 01:19 PM by Dawgs
And, let's say the next Democratic candidate does the same thing. And so does next.

How soon will we get gay marriage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spectral Music Donating Member (349 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
49. So let's say he didn't pick a famous minister who wants gays not to exist
What then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. It's been twelve years, and since that time
Edited on Mon Jan-19-09 12:48 PM by Occam Bandage
the concept of civil unions has gained widespread acceptance among many people. It's possible that, rather than triangulating, he simply decided at some point over the past decade that civil unions are closer to what he believes is right than gay marriage is.

(Also, not really what "triangulating" means, but it'll work for this conversation)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
43. I don't know about that...
I mean the term "marriage" is pretty clear. And Barack was very outspoken in favor of it. You are correct that the civil unions idea wasn't necessarily as big of a part of the debate back then as it is now. Back then it did seem to be an either/or situation amongst many people. So I can see how it's possible that he simply took the stand of the two sides that was closest to his belief. But I guess now there's 3 sides to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
50. The same people opposed to same sex marriage are opposed to civil unions
They see civil unions as gay marriage lite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galaxy21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Didn't his church support it?
I'm not sure. If they did, it's not impossible to believe he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think they did support it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laughing Mirror Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Yes, Rev Wright has supported same-sex marriage for decades
when almost no other reverend did. Few do today even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
52. You mean the church he left?
There's strong evidence he's about to become a Baptist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Currently, yes, because "God is in the mix." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. how many politicians are for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
37. Only the progressives with a backbone
Too many progressives are lacking them, so the "center" drifts further and further right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
39. Oh right. As long as almost everyone else is against civil equality it's ok.
I forgot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
40. As long as he's in the majority, I guess it's OK.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. it violates his religious beliefs. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. That's his problem
he has no business shoving his religious beliefs onto anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
41. Then his beliefs are wrong.
As wrong as the whackos who thought there was a space ship in the Hale-Bopp comet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eryemil Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. If his words can be taken at face value then yes, he's just another bigot
I voted yes but I also have my suspicions. The guy's a politicians, you can NEVER take anything they say at face value.
So I wouldn't be surprised if he was much more progressive than he let on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. He has clearly said he is against Gay marriage
Either I take him at his words or I conclude that he is willing to put aside his beliefs for votes.

I'll take him at his word.

I approve of a great deal of what he is planning. But not on his views of equal rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Biden said the same and I think that is consistent with most democratic politicians
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Sadly you are right- very few have the guts to stand up for GBLT rights.
They are to afraid of losing funding and votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celeborn Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
45. They're acting like cowards for no good reason.
I bet anything that it wouldn't cost Obama or other Dems any popularity to come out in favor of gay marriage. In fact, it might push some of Obama's black supporters off the fence on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. Definitely in favor of civil unions not sure about the term marriage
If I take Obama and Biden at their word and don't consider what they said as political posturing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. And if civil unions are given 100% what "marriage" has, then the discussion is ended
Except those who feel some psychotic need to hijack terms, if only to annoy those who use the words the most... It's a word. Go for the action and the meaning. Those seem more relevant and worthwhile than a word.

But if they want to hijack the word, that's their problem. This issue has been discussed to death, 6 feet under, and beyond. It's time for everybody to move forward, for pity's sake.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. "those who feel some psychotic need"
THAT'S RICH coming from YOU. You are Mr. Psychotic Need himself. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. People are showing their true feelings about the GBLT community
Better to know up front then be fooled by some pretty politically correct jargon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Isn't that the truth?
:eyes:

Sigh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Which shows we should all be very glad you're not an attorney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. I can already get married
I just can't get any of the rights that go along with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. Yes. I have no doubt that gay rights will advance under Obama's first term, but
equality will have to wait for either a new President or (as I hope) a change of heart from the incoming one driven by a continued and accelerated shift in public opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
31. Is Obama a liar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodramamama Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Obama's exact words on gay marriage
"I'm a Christian. And so, although I try not to have my religious beliefs dominate or determine my political views on this issue, I do believe that tradition, and my religious beliefs say thatmarriage is something sanctified between a man and a woman."

http://lesbianlife.about.com/od/lesbianactivism/p/BarackObama.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
32. He makes that push then be prepared for President Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fran Kubelik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. ok.
Definitely let's not go there then. Fuck the gay people. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
42. He said he is against it, but I don't believe him on that. I think he said what he
thought he had to say to give himself the best shot at being elected. I hope to God I am correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fran Kubelik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
44. I can't know for sure.
But I look forward to finding out. I believe Obama will be more good than bad for me and my family. I hope I am right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
46. If I take him at his word then he supports equal rights under a seperate status/term
It may be politics or his actual belief, that's impossible to determine without reading minds but I do think he will do what he can to advance the cause of equality. He is only the President, not God Emperor it is pretty limited what he can effectively decree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
47. Yes, against marriage, but for all the legal rights that accrue to
those who are married being given to our gay citizens.

I don't think that's enough, personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
48. I think he is saying what he feels he has to to get voted in
just a feeling, i have no proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-09 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
51. You can't have it both ways.
Either he's dishonest and doesn't mean what he says, and therefore untrustworthy, or we have to go by what he says.

Which?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC