Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have to admit, at least Limbaugh was honest.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
PlanetBev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:04 PM
Original message
I have to admit, at least Limbaugh was honest.
Pigboy stated what we already knew was in his sorry sack of shit head...he wants Obama to fail.

After the election, Hannity, looking miserable, dejected and bitter, said that he wanted Obama to succeed. Does anybody really believe that?

These people need power like we need air. They need it to live.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Limbaugh is a traitor
Nothing more. He want's America to fail so his cronies can steal more $$$.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The real traitors are the media monopolies.
They are the ones that gathered enough power to let demagogues like Limbuagh and O'Reilly take over the airwaves. Break up those monopolies, restore the Fairness Doctrine and force broadcast stations to be responsible to their community needs (as they used to be) and the Limbaughs will dry up and blow away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. My dad used to listen to 740 AM KTRH in Houston...
during the afternoons on his way home from work. This was not a political talk radio station. It was mostly a news station. They had a nonpartisan stock market guy during that timeslot. He would give people advice on how to invest their money in the best way possible. At some point after Bush got into office, Clear Channel (the owner of 740 KTRH) decided to pull this show off the air and put Sean Hannity's show on during this timeslot. My dad called and protested. They didn't give a damn. It was all about pushing an agenda on their listeners. That station used to be strictly for news (not opinion), sports, and like I said, nonpartisan stuff like stock market investment advice. My dad has been fuming about that ever since. Clear Channel bought out whoever owned it previously and decided to completely change the content of the station even though the station had such a long history of simply being informative to the citizens of Houston.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Got news for you. Every CC station got the same.
Here in Orlando, we have two shows that are still locally originated, because the hosts are showy characters: The Monsters of the Morning and The Philips Phile. They made it to XM radio on Clear Channel's dime.

That may be ending. Clear Channel is cutting a lot of jobs - that means whoever reads local news at your station. The music stuff is all preprogrammed anyway. They might as well dynamite your local station and tell you to get their XM channel.

Broadcasters used to care about your community because they had to; they were tied to community interests and needs. They had to win their right to broadcast by proving they served the community. That ended with Saint Reagan, and the Bushes (and Clinton) continued that.

Soon, there might as well be one Clear Channel station for the country. It will all be cookie cutter, pre-determined by the guys at the top...and it will be disposable. The tradition of local control and local content for broadcasting will be ended.

That is why breaking up the monopolies and insisting on community involvement is necessary. Not just to stop the right wing control of broadcasting, but to make radio and TV stations worth something to the community and the public again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. At least Limbaugh finally admitted, on air, that he wants to see America fail.
Treasonous dirtbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. I doubt that.
He's probably on his knees every night praying for Obama to restore some sort of financial stability to save his investments. He only says he wants Obama to fail because its part of his act. He's a snake oil salesman. He pitches whatever he thinks will sell to the rubes that listen to him. For his own personal finances you know he's got to be hoping everything doesn't collapse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. He has nothing at stake...
He makes millions upon millions of dollars per year, so he has no problem if the country completely collapses. He'll just withdraw his money from the bank and move somewhere else.

It's a shame that he cares more about ideology than the country's well-being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Course he does. If he was president, I'd want him to fail.
I don't see why Limbaugh's statement is at all controversial. He's an ultraconservative. He is against everything Obama stands for. So, given that, why in the world would he want Obama to succeed?

I understand Limbaugh's statement because I feel precisely the same way about his politics. I don't want politicians who hold views similar to his to succeed, because their success is bad for America. He believes -- wrongly -- the same about Obama. So, other than the wrongheadedness of his political views, I don't see Limbaugh's statement as even remotely surprising, much less controversial or even "traitorous."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NatBurner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. that bullshit was just a ploy to reinforce their whole 'socialism' meme
which is also a bunch of bullshit

rush? eat a plate of dog dicks and die

the sooner the better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Dog dicks are too good for him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. We already knew limpdick wanted America to fail and
he hates America..Fuck him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC