Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Idiotic Start To Chuck Todd's Stint As NBC's Chief White House Correspondent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:07 PM
Original message
The Idiotic Start To Chuck Todd's Stint As NBC's Chief White House Correspondent
from Huffington Post

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-nickolas/the-idiotic-start-to-chuc_b_160080.html

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs is holding his very first White House press briefing as I write this. In just the past two days, President Obama has been inaugurated, signed significant executive orders (and here) on Guantanamo Bay, interrogation techniques, ethics reform, banning of all federal lobbying by his former staff while he is president, transparency on presidential records, and spoke to Middle East leaders.

So, what was the third question of the press conference, asked by new NBC chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd?

Well, Todd wanted to know whether Obama would be re-signing yesterday's executive orders given that he retook his oath of office last night, and that resulted in about a five minute back-and-forth about the retaking of the oath idiocy.

Come on, Chuck. What a tone-deaf way to start your White House stint. Just awful and hopefully not a sign of things to come.

I suppose you can reshuffle the networks' White House correspondents, but they will still ask the inane and irrelevant questions when there are some major developments that do, in fact, warrant serious scrutiny and questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds tabloidish...
who gives a shit outside right wing blogosphere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Todd's a good political analyst but sucks as a reporter. He is out of his element on the WH beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hes a good numbers man...and thats it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Todd is an ass who, no doubt ,votes "R." He has a
big burr up his butt over Obama's having been elected. This kind of nonsense just makes him look ridiculous. Hope Olbermann calls him on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Do you realize that he's asking the questions that Obama is going to be hounded by?
I thought to myself yesterday, "Does this mean those orders are null?"

Todd asked what I wanted to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Except that NUMEROUS newspeople have said that Obama was President at noon
on Tuesday WITH OR WITHOUT the oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. So? Who says they're correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. The Constitution. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Oh, you mean that thing people spend millions on per year to figure out in court cases?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. When Kennedy was assassinated LBJ automatically
became President. He did take the oath shortly thereafter, but the country was never without a President. I have to assume same goes for the Obama. Under the Constitution he became President at noon. The oath, though required for him to "execute" the duties of the office, is not a prerequisite to him having become President at noon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Brian Williams said the same thing in last night's NBC Nightly News broadcast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's a smart ass who wants it all to be about him
This is no surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Chuck Todd and David Gregory two jerks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. I never understood, why the hell they would choose that idiot
for such an important job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. The presswhiners need to put away
childish things and join the adults for smart questions and answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfpcjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. K he's no Tim Russert
He's young, give him a chance to do the job for GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-09 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. Do you know how Gibbs responded?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC