|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
GarbagemanLB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:16 PM Original message |
What, exactly, is the argument AGAINST Obama cutting his own pay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orestes (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. It would be unconstitutional for him to do so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
65. right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeglow3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #65 |
80. Nothing stops him from turning around and giving it back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TTUBatfan2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
2. The Constitution states... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hamsterjill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. That would earn him a lot of respect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TTUBatfan2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:34 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Actually... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 07:30 PM Response to Reply #18 |
55. Yes. And there is another difference between Presidential and staff salaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
33. i wasn't aware the WH staff were forced to donate their salaries? I'm opposed to that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Career Prole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:53 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. "That way he works for me." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hamsterjill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 05:14 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. Where did I say that WH staff were forced to donate their salaries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YvonneCa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
22. He could. But why would we ask that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TTUBatfan2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Well, we aren't asking it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:50 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. Got a link to the media asking Obama to do that? thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TTUBatfan2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:51 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. It was from the press conference today... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 07:31 PM Response to Reply #36 |
56. Will that stupid lady accept a cut in her salary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TTUBatfan2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:53 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Here's a link to an AP article on it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 05:15 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. Thanks, I missed that. The US constitution seems to be the correct answer here to that question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vattel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #44 |
68. Oh suddenly the Constitution's text matters, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:48 PM Response to Reply #68 |
73. Say what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vattel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 10:30 PM Response to Reply #73 |
78. nevermind, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YvonneCa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 06:29 PM Response to Reply #27 |
52. I agree. I saw the press conference... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
28. Obama isn't exactly filthy rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TTUBatfan2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. I think... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:48 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. What if that doesn't happen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TTUBatfan2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:49 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Oh I know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wmbrew0206 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 05:59 PM Response to Reply #28 |
48. $400K is a pretty nice salary, especially when you have no living expenses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 06:34 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. When you have what SHOULD be the most high stress job on the planet and if you are doing it right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wmbrew0206 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:18 PM Response to Reply #53 |
66. Neither do I, but remember that other Federal Employees salaries as based off of the POTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TTUBatfan2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 07:34 PM Response to Reply #48 |
57. They have to pay for their food too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wmbrew0206 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:02 PM Response to Reply #57 |
62. They do have to pay for their own food, but no official dinners or lunches. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TTUBatfan2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:41 PM Response to Reply #62 |
72. Right, just their normal groceries... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wmbrew0206 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 09:00 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. I would suspect that it is a greatly reduced rate though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TTUBatfan2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 10:21 AM Response to Reply #75 |
79. You're probably right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 07:37 PM Response to Reply #48 |
58. They have living expenses to pay in the WH. And I believe they still have a home in Chicago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wmbrew0206 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:04 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. Yes, but if they could afford the house on a Senator's Salary, they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:20 PM Response to Reply #63 |
67. I believe they do have some WH expenses, such as food. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wmbrew0206 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:28 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. I agree. I don't see any reason either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 10:14 PM Response to Reply #67 |
77. I think all of the WH stuff including food is paid for by the taxpayers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 07:43 PM Response to Reply #48 |
59. Don't they still have a residence in Chicago? And bills that need to be paid there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wmbrew0206 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:14 PM Response to Reply #59 |
64. Save for retirement? Seriously? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:39 PM Response to Reply #64 |
71. Isn't a "budget" a fixed amount? I'm saying that all of these expenses are accounted for very |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wmbrew0206 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:52 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. A "budget" is normally a projected amount that you are expecting to spend over a certain time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soccermomforobama (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. The Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
4. Congress determines the pay of the president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffreyWilliamson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. The Constitution bars them from doing that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeffreyWilliamson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
5. The Constitution says his salary cannot be increased or diminished. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SunsetDreams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
6. You're right, he should symbolically freeze his salary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:38 PM Response to Reply #6 |
26. and his is currently frozen since 2001 and I suspect will not be increased with this congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SunsetDreams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:47 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. exactly n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. do you understand the difference between a pay raise freeze and a pay cut? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
8. His pay *IS* frozen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kirby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:25 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Come on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GarbagemanLB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:32 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. I expected nothing less. Attacking the poster and not the post seems to be the strategy around here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
11. Deleted message |
GarbagemanLB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:32 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Yes, please make this into a racial issue. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atreides1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
12. You've Heard of the US Constitution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcrush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
14. If he asked for a modification to his own salary then he wouldnt be freezing his pay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clear Blue Sky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
15. He could simply donate a portion back to the US Treasury. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
19. The reporter should have done his/her homework to find out how the President's salary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
20. I don't want anybody's salaries "cut" or "reduced"......They all pay into Social Security and..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
21. The actual salary of the President isn't particularly high. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
23. The President is underpaid. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
24. It has been frozen for years and I think takes a vote from congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Life Long Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
25. There's a pay freeze. Get it right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
29. Maybe 'cause Obama has the hardest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sohndrsmith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
39. I don't think it's his choice. He could certainly put it in the bank and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
40. This is idiotic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 05:10 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Hello! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 05:49 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. Sounds like another FUX faux controversy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
41. I'm sure Obama will make charitable contributions from his personal income every year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
46. Staffers who make 100K or more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
47. He doesn't have the power to do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
49. I believe it is unconstitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
50. Because the question was simply an in-your-face by the newly-emboldened Bush poodles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wmbrew0206 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
51. The POTUS salary is also used as a measuring stick which federal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
54. So now that FOX fly-weight "April Ryan" is ruling the news cycle?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
60. There's a difference between "freeze" and "cut" - did Gibbs correct the MSM today? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sammym3 (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 07:56 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Thank you. And why should he take a cut. Look what's facing him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Still Sensible (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 09:02 PM Response to Reply #60 |
76. I don't believe that's true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-09 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
70. Why should he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC