Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Gillibrand a DINO?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:07 AM
Original message
Why is Gillibrand a DINO?
Because she supports the Second Amendment? So did Howard Dean. The wrenching of clothes over Paterson's pick better not be because of that faux issue.

Does she support the EFCA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. here are her campaign and House sites
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 12:11 AM by JoeIsOneOfUs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Here's her record on trade, which might be of interest.
Protect American jobs from going overseas. (Nov 2006)
Voted YES on promoting free trade with Peru. (Nov 2007)
Voted YES on assisting workers who lose jobs due to globalization. (Oct 2007)
Block NAFTA Superhighway & North American Union. (Jan 2007)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. saw some stuff on her website about aid for NY workers losing jobs overseas. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. She's not, really, but some people here have a knee-jerk reaction to the phrase "Blue Dog."
In reality, she's extremely liberal for her district: Pro gay rights, pro choice, pro alternative energy, against the war, etcetera. Only things anybody can point to are guns, immigration, and telecom immunity.

http://www.ontheissues.org/NY/Kirsten_Gillibrand.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. she voted against the $700B bailout package
http://kirstengillibrand.com/release.asp?id=1

$700 Billion Financial Bill:
In September, Congresswoman Gillibrand voted against the $700 billion financial bill. While mindful of the gravity of the financial crisis, she voted against both versions of the bill because of their flawed approach and lack of protections for taxpayers. Congresswoman Gillibrand has been named one of the most independent Members in the House of Representatives, and she did not feel the bailout bill would work as promised. In doing so, she stood up to both her party's leaders and the Bush Administration on behalf of taxpayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. And? By all accounts that thing has been a disaster.
Some other dems, including members of the CBC, also voted against it. Are they DINO's too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yeah, it couldn't be that she'd rather it be spent for TAX CUT for the rich like other blue dogs?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. is that what she said? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
34. No. SnF is simply making shit up and hoping some of it's true. nt
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 02:30 AM by Occam Bandage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
33. Except she's only got single-digit ratings from each of the pro-tax-cut organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
53. A big accusation to make without any facts to back it up
so where are they? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. I meant it as a GOOD thing to vote against it.
I don't really understand it all, but the free-up-credit argument was the only convincing one I heard back then, and that doesn't seem to have happened, and we don't really know where that $$ has gone. I'd rather we had mailed each American $2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. gotcha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #19
40. Hell she could commit a felony and you'd have some sort of EXCUSE for it.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #40
54. So you support the baillout from last fall?
I did as well, but that hardly makes one a liberal. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liskddksil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. against comprehensive immigration reform
also voted for the FISA act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. There really wasn't a true party position on that.
Labor opposed that bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liskddksil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. She is supporting the SAVE act
which most Democrats oppose and will certainly rile up Hispanics who are needed to build a winning coalition.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3702780
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Um, the FISA act Obama voted for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Doesn't make it right. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. But does it make her (and by extension Obama) a DINO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. I'm sorry, I'm not a ONE issue voter. It's another bit of data. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. Obviously you ARE a one issue voter, since all you've got is the phrase "Blue Dog."
Please tell me where the conservatism is here:

http://www.ontheissues.org/NY/Kirsten_Gillibrand.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #29
41. Blue Dog is NOT one issue but equates to what was "moderate republican" before the New way/DLC ...
takeover of our beloved party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. No, it doesn't. Read her issues page.
http://www.ontheissues.org/NY/Kirsten_Gillibrand.htm

For crying out loud, she's for repealing DOMA and DADT, increased regulation, and a dozen other things. You're basing your entire view of her on two words with no substance behind it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
55. Not true. She's uninformed on multiple issues.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemFromMem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. DING DING DING DING DING
Patterson needs to pick someone who will have a good shot at winning when running to defend the seat. She won't even win the primary if she's alienated one of the largest immigrant populations of any state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. She is to conservative for NY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. She's got the same progressive rating as congresscritters from NYC. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Yeah 90 something percent - same as Holy Joe from CT. But where War and Surveillance are concerned
depend on her to swagger and spook. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
32. She has a 100% rating from the ACLU. Do you even do any research whatsoever? nt
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 02:30 AM by Occam Bandage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. No, and he/she/it obviously doesn't listen to anyone else's research either.
They just keep repeating the same tired nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. That (ACLU) is NOT the litmus test. She's Blue Dog stock = pro-war, anti-immigrant. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. The ACLU has been a reliable gold standard for progressive thought for
some time, including right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #39
46. I brought it up because you brought up surveillance. Oh, and she's against the war.
How many things are you going to just make up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #39
50. You don't know what you're talking about. She's quite anti-war.
Ran against the war in 2006, voted to start withdrawals within 90 days in 2007, still opposes it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #32
52. Shirley you just jest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. She voted FOR the Free Choice Act in 07
I still think she is going to have to prove she can be more liberal or shes likely to get beat in a Primary.

Lets see how she votes on the Stimulus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. EFCA is a litmus test for me. And she passed.
She is not a DINO. No one who votes for EFCA is a DINO. No way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
22. ADA gave her 70%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yep, another Blue Dog/DLC/New Way Democrat moving the party to the intolerant right.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. Do you suffer from some disorder that makes you repeat yourself?
Because you're spewing the same unfounded drivel, and ignoring the repeated links that prove that you don't know what you're talking about.

http://www.ontheissues.org/NY/Kirsten_Gillibrand.htm

Yeah, that evil right-wing pro-gay-rights, anti-war wing of the Democratic party. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. Pro-Civil Unions does not EQUATE to Pro-Gay Rights.
Instead of launching personal insults (disorder :wtf:) how about you realize that not every democrat is right wing = blue dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #38
56. If you don't want to be insulted, try actually reading what's said to you.
She's for gay marriage, by the way, as well as repeal of DOMA and DADT. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. Maybe you could try actually looking up some of her positions on the issues
instead of throwing random words together with slashes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
25. As a constituent of newly appointed Sen. Burris, I'm sort of sitting back laughing
We Illinoisans didn't get a lot of sympathy here when we were less than thrilled with our governor's appointment.

All I can say is, whoever she is, ahem, the appointment will be legal. Deal with it. Perhaps you New Yorkers are now wishing your legislature would have superseded the governor and called for a special election? That's what I wanted here in Illinois, but the notion was scoffed at.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #25
37. I'm thinking you are going to end up w/a way better Senator than NY will have. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SuperTrouper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #25
45. God Bless Burris. Blago did better than Paterson!! What a f-ng mess in NY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sohndrsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
27. Has there been any official announcement that she is, definitely Paterson's
pick?

Maybe if she's as disappointing as some are describing (I support the 2nd Amendment, too, but not in the maniacal way that it is sometimes interpreted to mean, but that's a whole other discussion), Paterson did go for a "seat warmer" ... maybe? I heard him make comments about the chances, historically, of winning the seat via election after being appointed vs. those who have only held the seats via election... but the sound was not good, so I'm not absolutely sure, but he seemed to be indicating that he, personally, did not think the odds were great for appointed Senators to win the seat through election. I don't know - I'd have to look up statistics and see if that's the case.

I am underwhelmed by the lack of info on Gillebrand's issue positions (at least the one provided by another DU'er's post)...

Conclusion - I have no clue as to what's going on or why... : )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
28. *yawn* She represents a conservative district in...
upstate NY, so she would tend to try to throw her district a few bones.

I don't like all of her positions, but I certainly don't like the threat from McCarthy to do primary battle with her over her gun positions in two years. That will not end well, and could kill the deal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
36. She is co-sponsor on the bill for the freaking border fence - ugh!
What a FUBAR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
42. If she is officially Paterson's choice at noon today, she is a good choice,
insofar as one likes Senators to be liberal populists strong on key progressive issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NikolaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
44. I Don't See A
problem with her or her record :shrug:.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
47. Because someone here at DU deemed Gillibrand wasn't as progressive as he/she (the DUer) is
which in my book - is total bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
48. I support second amendment rights but yes, she is a DINO.
Anyone who is a member of the odious blue dogs is.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #48
59. so how many Repubs support repeal of DOMA and supported EFCA
Do you simply live your life looking at how someone else labels things, or do you try to think for yourself from time to time?

Yes, she's a blue dog. But if you think being a blue dog means one is reaaly a republican, not a Democrat, then my question for you is how could someone with a 100 percent rating from the ACLU and who supports gay rights (indeed -- who went so far as to suggest all federal marriages -- gay and straight -- should be governed by the same "civil union" rules) is really a repub?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
51. because she isn't 100% pure for some around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
57. She's not a DINO
The Pup Tent Democrats simply think that only people who agree with them on every single issue meet the definition, but they are, blessedly, a small and irrelevant minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
58. She supports extending the Bush tax cuts, for one thing. Unless she pulls a Mitt Romney....
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 02:06 PM by ClarkUSA
.... which no doubt she will, as she has with gay rights and gun control within the past 24 hours. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC