|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
EraOfResponsibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 09:56 PM Original message |
Will "I Won" backfire on Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
1. Who gives a shit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 04:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
70. I certainly hope so..nobody needs to coddle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 05:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
72. NOGAS* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
2. No.. they've met their match |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 08:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
93. I don't he will either, but the repigs are going to make his tenure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. Did "spending political capital" backfire on Bush? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. No. It was a bluff. He had little political capital. 9/11 gave him fear capital, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
4. Nope. It's the truth. And they know it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
5. They barely have filibuster ability in the Senate and are back about 80 seats in the House. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
6. You seem concerned about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
7. It was the PERFECT retort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. Much better than a nonadmission from bushitler that "I cheated!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
9. I hope so, repukes have nothing to fight back with, they were wrong and they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Optical.Catalyst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:54 AM Response to Reply #9 |
63. The only thing the Republicans can do is attack President Obama's character |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. Nah...they'll respect it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EraOfResponsibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. OH MY GOD I LOVE YOUR NEW USER NAME! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
33. I'm a fan of the cartoon character myself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:56 PM Response to Reply #10 |
86. True. Bullies always respect standing up to them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
11. No, they needed to hear it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jawja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 09:35 AM Response to Reply #11 |
67. Repukes have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
12. Bush in 2000 was much more arrogant than Obama and he didn't even win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EraOfResponsibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. That's true and I remember that very well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cirque du So-What (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
14. I hope it gives elected Democrats pause for reflection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EraOfResponsibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
28. Right on, Cirque, thanks for that reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
15. Holy Shit! Not another slew of "concern" threads? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:08 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Well, guess this comes in handy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EraOfResponsibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:21 PM Response to Reply #16 |
30. LOL!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 04:55 AM Response to Reply #16 |
58. No, they needed a reminder that "elections have consequences" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
71. Thank you I have been searching ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 08:26 AM Response to Reply #16 |
94. thanks frenchiecat, I needed that!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:55 PM Response to Reply #15 |
85. Every day a new concern! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
17. They were gonna be out for blood no matter what Obama said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
18. You know, Bush was the most arrogant ass hole who didn't even win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nevergiveup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
19. Are you joking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
20. OOOHHH, let's get scared! Seriously, rat's arse and all that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NRaleighLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
21. It's a big improvement over Harry Reid's world class dry powder! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
22. Good for the Pres! Someone has to smack the Rethugs down--our congresscritters sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
23. "Will he piss off the Republicans to the point where they'll try harder to get back at Democrats?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nxylas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:41 PM Response to Reply #23 |
36. Nah, I think he's got the balance right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harry Monroe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
26. I don't think it really matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
27. Their party is DOA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
29. This post goes better with your old screenname |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DBoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
31. you mean the same republicans who looked forward to "hunting Democrats with dogs"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:29 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. The same ones that diagnosed Terry from a video tape. Snort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EraOfResponsibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
32. ALRIGHT ALRIGHT FOLKS, I GET IT!!! LMAO!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EraOfResponsibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
35. Well just out of curiosity, what are the reactions from Freeptards on "I won?" anyone know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:48 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. again....who gives a shit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EraOfResponsibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Well see, there's this republican on jackandjillpolitics who's saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 11:10 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Simple, the folks you speak of never wanted bipartisanship, so again, who gives a shit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EraOfResponsibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 11:21 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. It was almost as if he/she was threatening future opposition from the Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DBoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 11:36 PM Response to Reply #42 |
50. When was the last time Republicans were bipartisan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:56 PM Response to Reply #35 |
43. You mean, the "12 percenters"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:54 AM Response to Reply #35 |
62. I'll hazard a guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
37. Tough love sometimes makes people cranky. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
38. Wait... Mr. Obama didn't win? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
39. I'm still amazed by how some are so scared of the Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seldona (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
41. Perhaps he should have wished he were a dictator? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buzzard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
44. I say who cares it is the truth.n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
46. Time to hide another thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 01:59 AM Response to Reply #46 |
55. Deleted message |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
47. they will be pissed off anyway, dont forget what happened to clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
48. Context, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pmorlan1 (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
51. Oh, please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mz Pip (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
52. As opposed to what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
53. Always remember.....President Obama beat the Chicago machine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
54. Yeesh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lugnut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
56. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 02:08 AM Response to Original message |
57. I'm askairt of the bad 'publicans.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alwysdrunk (908 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 05:36 AM Response to Original message |
59. Hell no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snake in the grass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:00 AM Response to Original message |
60. Look at it this way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:28 AM Response to Original message |
61. the worst concern thread ever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 07:11 AM Response to Original message |
64. Obama may have to administer several |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejpoeta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
65. they needed to hear it. they have just rolled over the spineless dems for god knows how long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
66. Well at least he didn't say he had a 'mandate' and was going to spend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ObamaRules (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
68. The Republicans still think they are the popular party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NikolaC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
69. Oh Please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thothmes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
73. I don't think the pubs will need any excuse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hansel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
74. No, because of the context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:14 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. AND most people are giving him the ball to run with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
75. I wish them luck fighting against someone with a 70% approval rating.* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
77. I don't think he went far enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EraOfResponsibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 08:38 PM Response to Reply #77 |
87. LOL! word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TripleKatPad (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
78. The audacity of THAT one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gristy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
79. Will "I Won" backfire on Obama???!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
80. DO NOT trust the Republicans! They will never never change. Cut them loose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
81. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
82. No. This was just what was needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
83. Republicans? Fuck 'em |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
84. Obama won with more votes then Bush did so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
88. I doubt they were ever going to go easy on us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
89. LOL Good grief. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
90. It won't backfire as long as Democrats in Congress learn to act like THEY won, too!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-25-09 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
91. "try harder to get back at Democrats" ...no such thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olegramps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
92. I don't think they need any encouragement! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaydeeBug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-26-09 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
95. can someone elaborate on the "I won" statement? teh google is not help. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC