Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I am watching a rerun of MTP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:27 PM
Original message
I am watching a rerun of MTP
and, I am wondering if anyone disliked how Gregory kept interrupting Summers during his interview?

I am not sure that Summers is what our economy needs, but, I was aghast at what I perceived as Gregory's obvious disdain at what he had to say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. he did...but he didnt do that with boehner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snarkoleptic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No doubt. He allowed 'boner' to drone on and on.
Gregory is a closer personal friend of KKKarl as well, which is very telling about his character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I turned it off when Boehner came on
because I can't stand to watch him.

Thank you for validating what I thought I was seeing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Gregory allowed 61-detainee falsehood to stand unrebutted on Meet the Press
http://mediamatters.org/items/200901250006?f=h_top

Summary: On Meet the Press, host David Gregory allowed Rep. John Boehner to repeat the falsehood that, in Boehner's words, "we've already found" that 61 detainees released from the detention facilities at Guantánamo Bay are now "back on the battlefield." In fact, the figure, which comes from the Pentagon, includes 43 former prisoners who are suspected of, but have not been confirmed as, having engaged in terrorist activity. Moreover, even the Pentagon's claim that it has confirmed that 18 former Guantánamo detainees have returned to the battlefield has been questioned by experts.

Gregory did not note that according to the Pentagon, the 61-detainee figure includes 43 former prisoners who are suspected of, but have not been confirmed as, having engaged in terrorist activity -- detainees who have not been "already found <...> back on the battlefield," as Boehner asserted. Indeed, as Media Matters for America noted, during a January 13 press conference, Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell stated: "The new numbers are, we believe, 18 confirmed and 43 suspected of returning to the fight. So 61 in all former Guantanamo detainees are confirmed or suspected of returning to the fight."

Further, the Pentagon's definition of "returning to the fight" has been challenged by some analysts. As CNN national security analyst Peter Bergen noted on the January 23 edition of Anderson Cooper 360: "eturning to the fight, in Pentagon terms, could be engaging in anti-American propaganda, something that's not entirely surprising if you have been locked up in a prison camp for several years without charge." Bergen further stated: "hen you really boil it down, the actual number of people whose names we know are about eight out of the 520 that have been released , so a little above 1 percent, that we can actually say with certainty have engaged in anti-American terrorism or insurgence activities since they have been released. ... If the Pentagon releases more information about specific people, I think it would be possible to -- to potentially agree with them. But, right now, that information isn't out there."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I dislike Gregory because he only kisses Republican ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. He pretends to be "rough"
on repubs, but, it is very forced and phoney.

You are very right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. didn't watch, but I'm baffled that Chuck Todd didn't get that job. At least Obama
doesn't have to deal with Gregory directly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Todd is next in line
but Gregory will be there for yeeeeears

That is the way it works at NBC-WH reporter gets the MTP gig when it comes up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Maybe, if his ratings fall enough, DG will be out and Todd will come in. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. As long as ADM is paying the bills and they don't talk about agriculture ....
it doesn't matter who is reading the DC conventional wisdom

Even mention ethanol and your ass is GONE let alone anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. ADM - supermarket to the world. I don't even have TV and that's burned in my brain.
When they were advertising heavily on "public" radio I knew it was gone as a news source too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Russert had it so long there were probably WH reporters who never got MTP
was Andrea Mitchell WH correspondent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well yeah there does have to be an opening
I don't think Andrea was at WH. I think she was Capital Hill or just rotating between cocktail parties

Glad I checked before posting-YES she was at the WH '93-94
She has been the Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent for NBC News since November 1994. Previously, she had served as Chief White House Correspondent (1993–1994) and Chief Congressional Correspondent (1988–1992) for NBC News.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Mitchell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC