Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harkin will not vote for Geithner. Speaking on senate floor now. (CSPAN2)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 05:32 PM
Original message
Harkin will not vote for Geithner. Speaking on senate floor now. (CSPAN2)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Really? Why isn't he? I don't like Geithner, either. He and Larry Summers
were partly responsible for the economic mess we're in right now. Way to go, Tom!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Could be many reasons
1) He may think the fact that he refused to just say that he didn't correct 2001 and 2002 taxes because they were beyond the statue of limitations

2) He may think he is too connected to Wall Street - Harkin is a populist.

I bet there are many Democrats who will vote for him, who have reservations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I'm sure you're right and that there are many Dems who are voting for him
because they want Obama to have his important Cabinet member. But I have to say that not paying IMF taxes really bothers me. I worked at the IMF for years and they tell us that we have to make arrangements to have state and federal income taxes taken out of our paychecks because IMF won't do so, as it is a nongovernmental entity. I find it very difficult to believe that he didn't know or forgot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. It bothered me
because even if he somehow missed all of that - when he was caught on 2003 and 2004 - he had to have known he did the same thing in the two earlier years.

Reading your experience, he likely wasn't all that honest. I watched part of the hearings and he seemed pretty arrogant dancing around - rather than answering most of the Senators' questions.

I guess the Democrats didn't want Obama embarrassed, but it is hard to believe that he is so uniquely good that his dishonesty is accepted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. It's far more embarrasing
For President Obama to have a tax cheat at the head of the treasury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Harkin is smart. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hmmm. I like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. does it really matter? www.moneyasdebt.net
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. No it doesnt, Geithner will be confirmed
Its a protest/principles/purity vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Geithner and Summers are both useless Wall Street Whores
Bob Reich should have been in there instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Harkin has turned into a real blowhard over the years
He just gets worse and worse as the years go by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. The vote will be at 6pm and Geitner will be confirmed..
According to Krugman he is "uniquely qualified" for this position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I wonder what's up with Harkin?
Is he looking at the big pic? Or is there anyway to tell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I guess many of his constituents are upset about Geitner.
This gives him some cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Ah, maybe his constituents
aren't aware of the total picture? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Harkin is voting with his principles on this one, not to please Obama.
Edited on Mon Jan-26-09 06:16 PM by Mass
I am not going to hold this against him.

Enough people will vote for him for him to be confirmed, and Geitner came out as not honest when he tried to justify why he did not payback his taxes for 2001-2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. No one should vote for Geithner to "please Obama"..
They should be voting for Geithner because he is uniquely qualified for this position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. He should vote for Obama's choice unless he has a damn good reason not to
There's a tradition of senatorial courtesy with regard to Cabinet appointments and I wish more Senators had respect that. Senators get more input with regard to judges and other appointments but advise and consent for the cabinet means that the President should be allowed to pick his own cabinet unless there are drastically good reasons why his choice is unfit to serve.

I think the back taxes are a shitty excuse to not vote for Geithner. That said, you're right that this doesn't matter a whole lot in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. So - his lack of honesty dosen't count
I assume that Obama found him uniquely qualified - so he thought that was not enough to stop him. A senator may not want that compromise. Another way of looking at it is that the Obama team put the Senators in an awkward position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Because that tradition of senatorial courtesy was such a good thing
when the nominee was someone like Gonzo or Boulton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. Feingold voted no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I was wondering how he would vote, Same for Sanders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Anyway, seems that Geithner will be approved in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Btw, McSame voted no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. They are still voting but the pro-Geithner Sens are congratulating each other on the floor..
Seems like he has the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Feingold has been a strong proponent of senatorial courtesy
He even voted for Ashcroft when almost all of the Democratic Caucus did not in order to uphold this principle. Do you know his reason for not voting for Geithner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. That is more surprising as he generally votes for all cabinet positions
on the grounds that the President should have his team - he voted for Rice as SOS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'm not mad at anyone voting no on Geithner. It is hard to reconcile that
he will be in charge of the IRS and can't get his shit together to pay his taxes but the people in the know believe he is especially qualified for the position and has a unique understanding of the situation we're in, so I'll deal with him with the understanding that he is flawed but will be useful and help to lend some confidence for the financial sector.

I hope everyone votes down Lynn, however. I don't like making new rules and an exception to them in the same breath. The dude is highly likely to be a tool of the military industrial complex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. Harkin, Feingold, Byrd and Brown voted the way I would have, but Geithner will be held to task
Obama is not going to give him a free pass. Geithner is going to have his work cut out for him, as Obama says.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Brown did not vote. Sanders voted NO.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00015

Not surprise that they voted this way either. I would have voted this way too, had I have to choose. Between the tax question and the fact that he is so much in tune with the way the system is working (it may be a good thing to reform it, but people can be doubtful that he wants to reform the system).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC