Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sticking It to Rahm (Pub: Rahm hates us and lets us know it, and we hate him back")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 07:00 PM
Original message
Sticking It to Rahm (Pub: Rahm hates us and lets us know it, and we hate him back")
From their shared loathing of Rahm Emanuel to the insurgency led by the minority leader (“he took us by the throat”), the inside story of why not a single House Republican supported the president’s stimulus package.

"Rahm, you don't waste a crisis," a senior Republican, speaking on the phone in a mock dialogue, pretended to tease White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel the day before the stimulus bill vote in the House of Representatives. "Rahm, you're making the Clinton mistake going for spending in a crisis. Reagan radically adjusted the tax code in his crisis. Rahm, all you’re trying to do is scare people, like Hank Paulson did with the TARP. It won't work this time. We're wise to it. Rahm, you won't get ten votes from us. Not ten."

“Rahm hates us and lets us know it, and we hate him back,” said a senior Republican.

It turned out that this estimate was 1,000 percent too high, because Emanuel’s go-for-the-big-win style, even when mixed with the president’s earnest charm, did not gain even one vote from the House GOP. The caucus held together like a stone wall when it came time to vote on the Democratic-authored $825 billion stimulus package—all 177 members joined 11 “Blue Dog” Democrats for the 244-188 final tally. How this was done explains the sudden and surprising new discipline of the Republican Party.

"Rahm told the president that he can take care of Congress," a senior Republican reported to me. "He said, ‘These guys will roll over, they're afraid of being called the party of No. Believe me, I know them. They'll be easy.’"

The day before the vote, Emanuel sent the president to the Hill to meet with the House Republicans for a generous 90-minute question-and-answer session that was well-received by the members."He's charming," was the universal verdict, one prominent Republican told me. “The president was patient, he gave us plenty of time. But he didn't convince anyone. After he left, we looked at each other, and said, ‘How can they stick him with this garbage?’”

Since the beginning of his campaign for the presidency, Barack Obama has spoken repeatedly of “post-partisanship.” He promised that he would transcend the divisions of the past by uniting Democrats and Republicans alike. His actions, engineered by Emanuel, were intended to win enough Republican votes to claim not just a victory on the stimulus bill but also confirmation of his “post-partisan” leadership. The result, with not a single Republican voting in favor, despite Obama’s wining and dining, joking and cajoling, reveals a Washington as polarized as it has ever been. The dream of post-partisanship did not last one vote in the Congress.

The day before the crucial vote in the House, Minority Leader John Boehner told his troops that the Republican Party is no longer a bureaucracy. "He took us by the throat and told us, ‘You're no longer the majority, stop acting like it,’" a senior Republican told me about the run up to the vote. “‘If you've got an idea, get it on MSNBC. This is an entrepreneurial insurgency.’ He was kicking the ball around. He wants everyone involved. If there's an amendment, he told us to offer it. If you have 48 seconds for YouTube, get it up there. Get busy and resist in every instance.”

Emanuel, working with his old boss and ally, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, made it easy for the Republicans to resist. Every penny in the more than 600-page bill came from a Democratic wish list of pork that dated back to the beginning of the Bush administration. "They were limited the last two years by the White House keeping firm on the cap for each bill," a congressional source reported to me, "and Nancy Pelosi told them all to send their ideas to David Obey , and he just put them together in one great big earmark."

"We won the election, we wrote the bill," said Pelosi as many times as she could to an open microphone. But what was happening away from the microphone made it even easier for the Republicans to hold together. All they had to do was bring up Rahm Emanuel.

“Rahm hates us and lets us know it, and we hate him back,” said a senior Republican. “If we had gotten together in a room and tried to write a bill that put the taxpayer together with the Republican Party, we could not have come up with this thing. It is too unbelievable.”

Rahm Emanuel is the Republicans’ favorite piñata. Overwound and overbearing, the Chicago congressman helped destroy the Republican majority in 2006 when he acted as chief fund raiser, candidate recruiter, and stump speaker. On the night the Democrats took the House back after 12 years of Republican rule, he praised himself for delivering a “thumpin’.” Now that he’s Obama’s chief of staff, the Republicans have him to poke at for at least four years.

After the vote, President Obama, at Emanuel’s suggestion, hosted a bipartisan reception at the White House for congressional leaders from both houses. John Boehner joked that he felt like the “snake at the garden party.” But the Republican leaders were not silent.

“We gave the president what he asked for, a temporary stimulus bill,” said a senior Republican, “at half the cost of what the Democrats wrote. He knows it. They handed him a monster of spending. Rahm did this, and now he takes this to the Senate. Does Rahm want to be an honest broker, or does he want to be the guy who socks Republicans in the face? He isn’t helping with the Democrats, and he’s hurting with the Republicans.”

“Polling showed us that when we took the vote, independent support for the bill was collapsing,” a senior Republican said. “Democratic support was climbing while the independents ran away.”

“What does Rahm do? Is he going to go to the Democrats and say ‘no’ to this? Or is he going to make his president sign it?”

Emanuel’s answer to the Republican shutout is to announce that the Democratic Party will target Republicans by running campaigns in their districts to tell the voters that their representative “voted against 4 million jobs.”

Eight days after Obama’s inauguration, the partisan battles are at full tilt.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-01-29/sticking-it-to-rahm/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ahhhh. More soap opera fun from the Daily Beast.
I'm not sure whether to give them or Politico the prize for sensational bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Daily Beast does kind of remind me of
Politico in the sense that it sprang up out of NOWHERE (well, thanks to Tina Brown in regards to the Daily Beast) and are legitimized in the rest of the MSM immediately. Annoying as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They are tools of the right wing.
Not outright anti-Obama or anti-Democrat; but the stories are unsubstantiated crap with a negative slant. It is interesting how all of a sudden they are the "go to" blogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. "making the Clinton mistake, going for spending in a crisis."
Um, Clinton's spending and taxing policies turbo boosted the economy, producing the first budget surpluses in a generation and created record numbers of families moving up to the middle class. I'll take that Clinton-Obama style mistake over Republican fiscal stewardship any day of the week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. The truth is that President Obama did not need any repuke votes to get the bill passed,
so the only ones that got screwed by not voting for it were the repukes themselves...and they are too damn stupid to even realize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. GOP presidents mostly have big national debts
Clinton did a lot beeter than all of them put together
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. fuck the GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Those fuckers look like shit for blocking this plan. Who did this
hit piece on Rahm? Fuck this blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm glad Rahm is CoS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Yeah...he alienates EVERY republican, and he can't keep the Blue Dogs in line.
He's GREAT!!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Maybe the CoS should be Howard Dean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'd bet Boner is behind this BS article 110%. The way it praises him and suggests him as a bulldog
Edited on Sat Jan-31-09 01:29 AM by Parker CA
driving for the all out attention call of the pukes, and the slant against Rahm for acting as the same for the Dem's is much too coincidental of the good guy / bad guy cross comparison. Total and complete BS talking points and details fed to whomever penned this piece. Garbage at the highest level.

And just to put things straight, Obama is the President, and he tells his staff what to do. Rahm isn't running around like a chicken with his head cut off suggesting rash and ill-conceived plans. Pukes are getting played and they are about five steps behind so they can't even begin to figure it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. With his very first piece of legislation Obama took their block voting asses and threw them off the


cliff. like lemmings they fell for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. Next week when the Republicans get millions of calls
from moveon.org, ACT, and the Organizing for America...I think they are going to be a little bit more hesitant to be so fucking brazen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. Rahm gets precisely ZERO blame for this. The GOP is at SOP, just like they always are.
Some people (on blogs AND around here) have short memories. Remember Clinton's economic plan in 1993? Not one republican voted for it.

This is a replay. They're acting as partisans, and as partisans ONLY. It's what they do, it's what they've always done, and it's all they'll continue to do. It's their only game. And it's slowly killing their party.

Fuck every last one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
14. if this is true, then i just love rahm some more...
"Emanuel’s answer to the Republican shutout is to announce that the Democratic Party will target Republicans by running campaigns in their districts to tell the voters that their representative “voted against 4 million jobs.”"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Any site with Ana Marie Cox can't be all bad..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. Despite various well-publicized flaws, Emmanuel is my kinda guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brianna69 Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I love Rahm
Emanuel’s answer to the Republican shutout is to announce that the Democratic Party will target Republicans by running campaigns in their districts to tell the voters that their representative “voted against 4 million jobs.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. This article presumes that Republicans were willing if their conditions were met
It is the way they ran the WH and Congress when they were the majority. The problem is Republicans are rallying for a show of force.

They made their point that they don't want a post partisan Washington.

The counterpoint is that their votes were needed for this stimulus package.

The Beast also presumes to tell us that Rahm has exclusively laid out a roadmap that Obama is following. I doubt very seriously that Obama is a blank slate that his advisors write on.

The Republicans are wily and have been able to control the spin for decades. The question is will their spin become the current wisdom or will people look around it?

I don't think they have figured out how to divide and conquer enough ego driven Democrats in a similar fashion to what happen with Bill Clinton and a democratic majority in Congress. If Democrats who have worked with Republicans are dense enough to allow the Republican spin machine to provoke a loss in confidence in Obama's leadership in 12 DAYS, then Democrats don't deserve the mantle of leadership.

I don't happen to believe the Republicans, the media spin cycle, and hand wringing involved with this fear of post-/bi- partisanship.

If Obama doesn't make good on his campaign promises by the beginning of 2010, I will be deeply resigned to our failure. I stop believing in Republican prowess when Gingrich managed to gut his House leader status by being a self absorbed fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RollWithIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. Awww, Rahm was mean to them, seems to be a pattern...
They pulled the same thing with the first bailout, blamed their no votes on Pelosi. Said she was too mean to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychmommy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-09 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. i beg to differ that was not rahm's win in '06. thank you dr dean!
i am very sure that he won't make his president sign anything. it makes obama appear weak and clueless. nice try repug hacks. you guys are spinning so hard i am getting dizzy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. I beg to differ with that
It was Rahm's win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychmommy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. if it were up to rahm, the 50 state solution wouldn't have been
implemented. he would have used the same old losing strategy that he has been using. dr dean implemented the 50 state and energized the netroots. rahm may try to take credit but, that was dr dean's win. believe what you like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. explain
The 50 state strategy, giving specific names, events, and results as examples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychmommy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. google it, lot's of interesting stuff and things i didn't remember.
out of 22 candidates that rahm ran through his committee only 8 won. he tried to push folks to the right. there was a blow up between him and dean because dean wanted to spread the money around and rahm wanted to plow the money into the old electoral map. dean gave up some money to pacify him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
23. That's their excuse reality is they're playing poltiics with lives as usual.
Edited on Mon Feb-02-09 01:37 AM by cooolandrew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. Either Rahm or the President needs to get a better handle
on Pelosi. She allowed the damn bill to go through with certain spending in it that did nothing but give the republicans valid talking points and a good reason to stay in lockstep in opposition. It was unnecessary and counterproductive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC