|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Onlooker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 08:33 AM Original message |
Daschle should withdraw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 08:35 AM Response to Original message |
1. But then who would go to bat for the medical insurance corporations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 08:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Why, whomever Obama next nominates, of course! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
2. He should but I'm not holding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
3. Well, you can be sure that Obama won't dump him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
5. Daschle has as much integrity as Newt Gingrich (how he dumped his 1st wife that got him elected) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 09:47 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Yeccch! Thom Hartmann was really trying to push the positive spin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 11:13 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Greenwald covered that tidbit as an update. but I have not seen it published in MSM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
6. Todays NYTimes Editoral AGREES with you:............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
7. He's the guy who urged Obama to run NOW, and not later, when he had more experience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
global1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 10:37 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Well Daschle Is Not Obama - Daschle Has A Record And It Ain't Good....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 01:43 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. He's out now, anyway. But I wouldn't be surprised if someone with the same skillset replaces him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hay rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 03:08 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. fair assessment. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
8. His ego won't allow it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbie Jo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
11. I have never been a Daschle fan, I have to agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
12. Disagree. Health Care is more important that Daschle's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 11:18 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Perhaps, but what kind of health care reform? And, who will it most benefit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-09 12:56 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. well, I do not think those two are the only 2 that would do the reforms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC