Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judd Gregg appointment first suggested by . . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 11:55 AM
Original message
Judd Gregg appointment first suggested by . . .
Harry focking Reid.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/03/us/politics/03gregg.html?_r=2&hp

Mr. Obama’s secret interview with the senator at transition headquarters last month, aides say, was one of the few serious one-on-one conversations between them. In Mr. Obama’s brief time on Capitol Hill, they barely knew each other, aside from occasional chats in the Senate gym.

The idea of offering the job to Mr. Gregg came, at least in part, from the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid of Nevada. (The two senators are close, aides to both men said.) Mr. Reid mentioned the idea to Rahm Emanuel, Mr. Obama’s chief of staff, who passed it on to the president-elect.

During the presidential campaign, Mr. Gregg spoke sharply against Mr. Obama’s candidacy. He called the Democratic nominee’s spending proposals “the Obama spend-o-rama.” Then he attacked the principles of the party at a rally in New Hampshire, saying: “We don’t need any more Democrats as president of the United States. We had enough when we had Bill Clinton.”


Harry Reid: Screwing up the Senate and the administration. Heckuvajob, Harry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Man, Between him & pelosi,
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 11:56 AM by Dinger
we're fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Pelosi knows her reps better than Reid knows his senators imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Pelosi is fighting the good fight this time around.
Apparently, Obama has taken to the Harry Reid school of sucking up to Republicans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. why is Obama taking advice from douchebags?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dammit I am so sick of Reid. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobRossi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. DLC baby!
We been punked again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wondered how they got to know each other.
They're both UCC--well, Obama was--and I found myself wondering if maybe UCC members of Congress got together at times, or if they attended church together, not knowing where Obama attended in Washington. I didn't think that probably played a role, but they do have that in common, if nothing else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. I thought Reid was LDS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Judd Gregg and Obama are/were UCC. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. I wish there was a way to sh*tcan Reid and Pelosi both...
..they're both worthless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Why are you lumping Pelosi in with Reid when it's
Obama and Reid who are the ones who refuse to fight the Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. "impeachment is off the table" Pelosi ?
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 12:54 PM by Triana
I can't imagine...think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Reid got on my last nerve a while ago. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Reid got rid of an incumbent. Now, Democrats are even more favored to win the seat in 2010.
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 12:19 PM by ClarkUSA
95% of incumbents get re-elected. Now, the placeholder will get a stiff challenge from Paul Hodes or someone else from
the deep NH Democratic bench. Also, President Obama gets a fiscal conservative Republican singing the praises of his
stimulus package (which Gregg did during his acceptance speech at the White House this morning) which should make
his fellow Republicans choke on their BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
12.  So, he removed a pro-stimulus vote from the Senate.
Smooth move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. According to Nate Silver, passing the stimulus shouldn't be a problem.
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 12:42 PM by ClarkUSA
Nate Silver finds that in the 32 roll call votes to date in the U.S. Senate, Obama has some very reliable allies on the other
side of the aisle. They are: Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) and Sen. Lisa
Murkowski (R-AK). Whatever Nate says, I believe. The man knows what he's talking about.

Meanwhile, the New Hampshire Union Leader reports Rep. Paul Hodes (D-NH) will announce his candidacy for the U.S. Senate
"within the week." Paul Hodes is a popular and well-known incumbent Congressman who will soon become the next Democratic
Senator from NH. You better believe that President Obama will be campaigning for whoever the Democratic candidate is. In NH,
which Barack beat McCain in the GE, that points to a coattail win, especially if his approval numbers stay relatively high.

Team O, Sen. Harry Reid, and the DSCC are all way ahead of the curve. They're playing political chess while many at DU are
still mastering checkers.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Passing a stimulus isn't a problem.
Passing a good one is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Your previous comment implied that you thought it would be.
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 12:55 PM by ClarkUSA
As for what's a "good one," that's subjective. All I know is Gregg will be selling Barack's stimulus plan to his former
Senate colleagues, who trust and respect him. He's a means to more than one end. That's it.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. The stimulus bill is going to get watered down.
Less useful spending, more corporate welfare and tax cuts.

Same old, same old from the Democrats. Obama blew it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
18.  It's called compromise. The little stuff that'll get pulled will end up in other bills.
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 01:18 PM by ClarkUSA
President Obama is governing for all America, not just for you. He hasn't blown anything. Enough already.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. It's not compromise, it's spinelessness.
We are the fucking majority party, we won a crushing victory in November mandating change, and Obama is getting his ass handed to him in a policy debate by the people who ruined America.

What he is doing is NOT WORKING. He is getting high approval ratings and failing at everything else.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I beg to differ. I don't want a Democratic version of what happened the past eight years.
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 01:24 PM by ClarkUSA
Compromising on the little things is wise, because there are big battles ahead. Democrats won't be in the majority for long
if they behave as Republicans did for the past eight years.

How is "Obama is getting his ass handed to him in a policy debate by the people who ruined America"? Do you really think
Americans are that stupid? Why do you think Obama still has high approval ratings while Congress' is in the tank, especially
that of Republicans?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. You and I don't agree on many things, but I think you are exactly right on this.
I didn't like that style of politics when the Republicans played it and I don't think I would like the Democratic version any better. Obama has reminded us time and again that there is not a red America and a blue America and he is using his office to bring that point home. There has to be some compromise if progress is going to be made and Obama is willing to make the first moves. I think that is the right course to take in this situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. exactly.
Once again Obama is taking a longer view of things. The Dem challenger will have a good chance in two years and Obama will get his 60 vote majority most likely. Check and mate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC