Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is the Media acting like Withdrawing is worse than Not Withdrawing?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:36 PM
Original message
Why is the Media acting like Withdrawing is worse than Not Withdrawing?
If one withdraws, then they never get to serve, right?

Isn't that a good thing for the government?

So why is a withdrawal being interpreted as something nefarious?

What Am I missing here? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Probably the assumption that if he's dropping out, it's worse than we thought.
It's not fair, but that's my best guess. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because they've become sharks out for blood.
I can't even watch the news anymore. It's sickening. The pressers are worse. Fine time to wake up, asshats. This is the guy trying to fix the mess you enabled the past 8 years, and you're ripping him to pieces. Who thinks the MSM and the 'pubs are both trying to make President Obama irrelevant, and why? It's fucking clear to me what's going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. It's clear to me as well. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Drama. It's all theatre for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because it's democrats and not republicans. Were this a
republican administration, we would have to throw up while the media fawns over what great patriots these nominees were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Precisely. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. The reporters wouldn't stop asking about Obama's vetting process...
and why HE felt Daschle was good enough to join the admin. despite his problems since Gibbs kept saying Daschle REQUESTED his name be withdrawn. "What ARE the standards for nominees when being vetted?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Becasue they need a story.
They had two possiblities:
1) Daschle withdraws. Response: attack and criticize
2) Daschle does not withdraw. Response: attack and criticize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That appears to be the MO. Attack and criticize.......
Gawd bless the "liberal" media! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You mean the Obama Obsessed Fawning Media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yep....the Pastorgaters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. CNN believes that withdrawing is worse!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. MSNBC, too. But, they're obviously full of it to people who pay attention.
It must be a slow day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. Daschle is an idiot but where or where was the media when the Iraq
War began, etc. ? F*ck them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Bingo, Frenchie Cat. Don't pay any attention to them.
The alternate headline: "Obama Administration Tough on Prospective Cabinet Members".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nod factor Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Hey,
Either Daschle withdrew or the administration only pushed him out *after* the fallout, so pick your poison it's still not a good look. Man if you saw the ribbing I got super bowl day by my mostly conservative social network, it was one for the ages I must say. Some of the more high-profile picks have definitely come with some political baggage, no doubt about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Welcome to DU, nod factor.
I don't have any conservative friends and I'm not in love with most of Obama's picks.

BUT, the process is working. Obama is not recruiting insider criminals to head up the regulatory agencies like Junior did and I'm sure he won't give criminals the Medal of Freedom like the torture president did, either.

That's what this process is for, to catch problems.

What is being missed here is that Bush hired a bunch of convicted felons to his administration and no one said "boo!". Search "Iran Contra Bush Administration" and get an eyeful.

Thank goodness, this is a new day. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. great point...he's gone....N E X T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC