Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate votes to give a tax break to new car buyers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:04 PM
Original message
Senate votes to give a tax break to new car buyers
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 09:06 PM by ProSense

Senate votes to give a tax break to new car buyers

By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press Writer Andrew Taylor, Associated Press Writer – 2 hrs 23 mins ago

WASHINGTON – The Senate voted Tuesday to give a tax break to new car buyers, setting aside bipartisan concerns over the size of an economic stimulus bill with a price tag approaching $900 billion. The vote was 71-26 to allow many car buyers to claim an income tax deduction for the cost of automobile sales taxes and interest payments on car loans.

Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., said the plan would aid the beleaguered automobile industry as well as create jobs at a time the economy is losing them at a rapid rate. "I believe we can help by getting the consumer into the showroom," she said.

The provision was attached to the economic stimulus bill at the heart of President Barack Obama's economic recovery plan and is subject to change or even elimination as the measure makes its way toward final passage.

<...>

Mikulski's office put the cost of the tax break she sponsored at $11 billion for one year. It would apply to the first $49,500 in the price of a new car purchased between last Nov. 12 and Dec. 31, 2009. Individuals with incomes of up to $125,000 and couples earnings as much as $250,000 could qualify, including those who do not itemize their deductions.

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, sought unsuccessfully to derail the proposal, saying it would only increase consumer debt in a time of recession and adding that there were other provisions in the legislation to help the auto industry. But the 71 votes in support were far more than the 60 needed for passage.

link


Let's see deducting interest and taxes on $49,000 for cars (or SUVs) not tied to fuel efficiency for individuals earing up to $125K and couples up to $250K.

Is this smart?

Roll Call (Evidently, a lot of Repubs liked this one.)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kind of hard to get a tax break on a new car when you can't afford
a new car.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. "Making cars cheaper? Who wants that? Cars are too expensive!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. but they must promote electric cars...GREEN cars!!!!
above anything else.

This could be a winner - exports my dear Watson!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Given how desperately we cried for an auto bailout, I can't imagine anyone here would oppose this. n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. CRAP!! I just bought a new American car in January of 2008!
Where's MY tax break for keeping the big three in business.

For that matter why isn't there a requirement that all such cars be domestic?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
9.  a requirement that all such cars be manufactured domestically is what I first thought of
well, after my initial revulsion at the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Probably a fear of other nations doing the same thing, hurting the big 3 elsewhere
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 10:58 PM by ShadowLiberal
Part of what caused problems during the depression was everyone putting up protective measures on their own industries, some put up in retaliation of other countries putting them up, that ended up making things even worse overall worldwide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. May 2008 here.
Oh well, would have been helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why should new buyers get a tax advantage over old buyers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. NO, not smart. They should have tied it to fuel economy.
The higher the fuel mileage, the greater the percentage tax break, up to the average mileage vehicle.

No breaks for poorer than average mileage vehicles.

No fucking exceptions, commercial buyers can already write it off for business vehicles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is great for the foreign car makers.
And who is able to get a car loan? I thought credit was locked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And dealers, and the domestic car makers, and everyone employed by either in America,
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 09:10 PM by Occam Bandage
and everyone who lives in an area in which either type of factory exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Old school thinking ...
:freak:
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. As much as I would love to see this include a fuel efficiency clause...
I realize that would also exclude most pick-up trucks, which leaves me somewhat torn.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Might be helpful in NY state where our DMV whacks us over & over.
every-time a new car is sold from the time its made until its just about junked Ny collects sales tax on it. Another one of those little scams this state has. I do remember a time when the tax was deductible, that was before Raygun.

Lets see with GM begging me to buy a new vehicle including it loyality bonus & this plus the amount deducted from the vehicle its got to be worth well over 9 thousand maybe more on a truck. A 35 thousand dollar vehicle here has sales tax of 8.25% or about 2885.00 into the cost. I'm not buying yet maybe by the end of the year or next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. A story in the local news was about a bus route that has to cut service
even though the number of passengers has increased. Why? The bus company is supported by taxes collected when new cars are purchase...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. This is a stupid bill. Why rely on car buyers to bail out the auto companies?
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 10:22 PM by ProSense
How about supporting mass transit infrastructure to support that bus route.

The notion that people in a down economy (where unemployment is rampant) are going to be buying cars at a rate enough to stimulate the auto industry doesn't make sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-09 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. All the countries around NY Metro area get a piece of the sales tax ...
Edited on Tue Feb-03-09 10:30 PM by Historic NY
thats why the government is desperate for us to start spending again..no sales tax = less service & layoffs of public service workers etc. its happening. Homes not being sold also figures into the tax puzzle of revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
19. This sounds great! I was planning on buying a new car in a yr or 2, so maybe it's this year?
Mine won't be any $49,000 car. Not even close. But it'd still help to have a deduction for the sales tax and interest.

This might help move the cars that are sitting in lots, unsold, and help the auto companies by getting people to buy now instead of wait.

There are people out there who are employed and are driving around in old cars, waiting for a good time to get a new car. I was mulling over buying used instead of new, but then I thought the gas mileage would be better in the new ones...and if I get a deduction, that's sweet. I would still look for a car with great gas mileage, and the other things I want in a car for the next 10 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC