|
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 08:32 AM by karynnj
There are arguments to be made that it might be as important to have someone who could lead a movement as it is to be able to work easily with Congress. (If you want both, I can't think of anyone likely to take the position - Kerry is the only one I can think of, but he would likely would not want to give up his Senate seat, where he is SFRC chair. Bradley would be able to handle the Senate piece, but he hasn't really been an activist.) Even if Dean is not nominated, it does suggest that no matter who is in and who leads in the Senate and House, we really should channel the energy and enthusiasm for universal health care - and Dean and others with the ability to reach people through any means to line up support to pressure Senators on the fence will be needed.
Since 2005 (and possibly before) Kerry has used the example of the mobilization of people in the 1970 for the first earth day and how that movement led by efforts like the LCV designating the dirty dozen led to the creation of the EPA and much environmental legislation. (Kerry has used that in speeches at graduations recommending that people become or stay involved in politically fighting for things important to them)
At Take Back America, there was a panel with MLK's biographer, Roger Wilkins (who worked in the JFK administration), and Jesse Jackson - one point they made was that without the movement with people demanding civil rights, the people on the inside writing legislation would not have been able to succeed.
Watching TV cover the stimulus package and seeing how many shows repeat the Republican talking points, we likely will need Obama and a very good HHS secretary, good leadership in Congress and people making people to people contact to get people enthusiastically backing a bill. This is a case where polling is not even close - most people in this country agree that we need at least universal access to healthcare insurance.
|