Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking: Senate Dems Have Votes to Pass Stimulus!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:52 PM
Original message
Breaking: Senate Dems Have Votes to Pass Stimulus!
Reid Says Dems Have Votes to Pass Stimulus
Bill Continues to Grow Despite Senators' Efforts to Eliminate Excess
By JONATHAN KARL, RICK KLEIN and Z. BYRON WOLF
Feb. 5, 2009

Democratic Senate leaders said this afternoon that they have the votes to pass the stimulus bill and suggested they have little interest in making further changes to win more Republican support.

more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=6811948&page=1

==========

Thank goodness. Now to get those pesky Blue Dog Democrats back in line and we will have a bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hold The Vote Now!
Edited on Thu Feb-05-09 03:54 PM by Beetwasher
Let's get 'er done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Up or down
and the hell with those who vote no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good. But the proof is in the passing. And in what actually is passed.
Too much stimulus and needed programs have already been compromised out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't think they cut that much. Just enough to get a few moderate R's.
Collins, Snowe, Specter, maybe a couple more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Neuter the Blue Dogs and pass it now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Blue Dogs are in the House--now mostly irrelevant. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It has to gain final approval back in the House after conference..
so the Blue Dogs could cause some trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Maybe a little.
We've got more of a majority in the House, and there are no filibusters in the House. Maybe they'll toss in a few amendments, but if they voted for the initial House stimulus bill, most of them will vote for this one, especially since Obama will make hell for them if they don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Supposedly there are 49 BD Dems.. If they all vote NAY then that's a problem.
I think you are right but there is still some negotiating before all this is said and done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. "Evan Bayh Forms Blue Dog Caucus in Senate"
http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=10437

Bayh, who has spoken with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) about his initiative, said he is trying to create a faction of moderate Senators who will gather on a weekly basis ahead of the usual Tuesday Democratic Caucus meetings.

Additionally, Bayh envisions inviting outside speakers to address the group, which would also work in concert with third parties that have similar viewpoints, like the Third Way, a nonpartisan progressive think tank.

* snip *

Likely targets for Bayh would include moderate Democrats like Sens. Mark Pryor (Ark.), Blanche Lincoln (Ark.), Mary Landrieu (La.), Ben Nelson (Neb.), Jim Webb (Va.), and Sen.-elect Mark Warner (Va.).

* and new Blue Dog Senator K. Gillibrand!


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/14/evan-bayh-forming-conserv_n_150874.html

In the House, the Blue Dogs are not only overly cozy with corporate lobbyists, this is a coalition reluctant to embrace a progressive vision on issues like climate change, and committed to a financial plan focused on spending reductions and balanced budgets -- precisely when the federal government needs to be doing the opposite.

That Bayh wants a similar group working in the Senate is discouraging, to put it mildly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. I love how they call them "moderates". They are not moderates. They are conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. calling them "moderates" is turd polish
Edited on Thu Feb-05-09 05:27 PM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
35. For which, as far as I'm aware, he's still the only member.
The Senate's a lot different than the House--even some of the moderate to conservative Dems who would be Blue Dogs in the right district need to watch their flanks in the Senate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Haven't they always had the votes necessary for passage?
The issue is avoiding a filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes, a filibuster proof vote has been the issue...
60.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. We've always had the votes to pass it. It's the damn cloture vote that's the trick
and abuse of archaic Senate rules that require 60 votes to get anything done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. In practical terms nearly every bill now needs 60 votes to pass.
I wish they would force them to do the real thing but seems all have agreed to eliminate the need to actually play out the filibuster process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Numba6 Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Man, I thought I knew how things worked but this is
unbelievable -- & I'm not sure whom to believe ;-) -- if the GOP filibusters, where are the votes coming from?

I just called my state's 2 US senators -- Washington state

FYI, contact info for all US members of Congress here

I wasn't too surprised that they haven't been on the TV shows defending this, just disappointed as I am w/ all the Democrats who appear to be doing NOTHING for this.

But then I asked their position on the bill -- staff people for both claim neither one has a position on Obama's bill.

To me, it's bad enough Democrats act like ostriches and refuse to engage the Republicans.

But this stance is UNBELIEVABLE that they don't even have a public position on the bill.

Sure, they'll vote for it in the end -- but it may not come to a straight up & down vote BECAUSE Democrats like this are refusing to defend their own bill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. The Dems picked up a few Repubs so they can now block a filibuster attempt with 60 votes.
Then they will be able vote up or down and it will easily pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. So who're the Republicans?
IS Susan Collins on board? Who's the other Republican? There are only 58 Dem votes and they need 60.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I suspect Collins, Snowe and Specter..
Possibly a few more since now there is no reason to risk being seen as anti-stimulus and anti-Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Limbaugh has not yet issued his "No to cloture" order to repigs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. I'm going to call Specter's office in a few minutes.
To find out what's what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Numba6 Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. 538 analysis of likely GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Why does Reid feel the need to come out and tell everyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. In time for the evening news is my guess. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. probably for the same reason Bush's team was all "We won" in 2000...
... even though the result was still unknown.

Presenting the vote as a fait accompli makes Republicans look obstructionist if it fails; it'd probably be harder for them to vote against it if all the headlines are about how it's going to pass. It's not exactly the same as Bush's managing to present himself as the de facto winner before all the votes were counted, but it's kind of a similar psychological trick, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. I was watching some of the senate last night
and there is a lot of reaching across the aisle to REALISTIC republican ideas, you know when they weren't trying to change the rules with their amendments. Olympia Snowe is a great legislator. Even my senator Martinez had a damn good idea about housing that he withdrew at the encouragement of Dodd who complimented him and asked him to table so they could work something out on another idea he was working on-he did. Anything proposed by the Cockburns, Bunnings and Vitters of the world were shot down by over 60 votes every time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. Reid? I wish we had a more reliable source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Tweety reported there are probably 5 R's who will break ranks..
I think this came out during an interview with Lindsay Graham earlier in the show which I missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Saw that myself!
SCHWEEET!!!

My guess: Snowe, Collins, Martinez will be among the ones voting for cloture. I'm not sure about the other two.

That means that even if a Dem or two breaks ranks, we can still win!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. This is so f'king close they better get this vote done tonight.
Even a 1 vote win is good enough. A win is a win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
29. Then It'd Better Damn Well Be the One We Want
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
33. Do it. Screw the Repubes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Obama gave the Repubs a chance and they blew it.
They lose big tonight even if this passes by one vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
36. Good - we have room possibly for a couple Dem. defections
The spending is MUCH needed.. states are suffering, our roads are in trouble, people are without affordable health care - could go on and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I don't think we will have any Dem defections.
If we get 5 Republicans then we will get all the Dems -- IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Hope you are right - that would be sweet!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. The only possibilities are Ben Nelson and Mary Landrieu...
and I think they are on board now with the changes that were made today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC