|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 03:52 PM Original message |
Breaking: Senate Dems Have Votes to Pass Stimulus! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hold The Vote Now! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalEsto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. Up or down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
3. Good. But the proof is in the passing. And in what actually is passed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 03:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I don't think they cut that much. Just enough to get a few moderate R's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
5. Neuter the Blue Dogs and pass it now! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
6. The Blue Dogs are in the House--now mostly irrelevant. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. It has to gain final approval back in the House after conference.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:04 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Maybe a little. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Supposedly there are 49 BD Dems.. If they all vote NAY then that's a problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. "Evan Bayh Forms Blue Dog Caucus in Senate" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. I love how they call them "moderates". They are not moderates. They are conservatives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. calling them "moderates" is turd polish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 06:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
35. For which, as far as I'm aware, he's still the only member. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
9. Haven't they always had the votes necessary for passage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Yes, a filibuster proof vote has been the issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
12. We've always had the votes to pass it. It's the damn cloture vote that's the trick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. In practical terms nearly every bill now needs 60 votes to pass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Numba6 (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
14. Man, I thought I knew how things worked but this is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. The Dems picked up a few Repubs so they can now block a filibuster attempt with 60 votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
17. So who're the Republicans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:22 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I suspect Collins, Snowe and Specter.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:36 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Limbaugh has not yet issued his "No to cloture" order to repigs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 05:02 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. I'm going to call Specter's office in a few minutes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Numba6 (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:31 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. 538 analysis of likely GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
19. Why does Reid feel the need to come out and tell everyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 05:20 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. In time for the evening news is my guess. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 05:30 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. probably for the same reason Bush's team was all "We won" in 2000... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
20. I was watching some of the senate last night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
28. Reid? I wish we had a more reliable source. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 05:48 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Tweety reported there are probably 5 R's who will break ranks.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 05:50 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Saw that myself! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 05:54 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. This is so f'king close they better get this vote done tonight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
29. Then It'd Better Damn Well Be the One We Want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
33. Do it. Screw the Repubes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 06:11 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Obama gave the Repubs a chance and they blew it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
36. Good - we have room possibly for a couple Dem. defections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 07:20 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. I don't think we will have any Dem defections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 07:23 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Hope you are right - that would be sweet! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-05-09 07:40 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. The only possibilities are Ben Nelson and Mary Landrieu... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC