Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

75 billion goes to the States - Repuke talking point

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:21 PM
Original message
75 billion goes to the States - Repuke talking point
Edited on Thu Feb-05-09 07:25 PM by rufus dog
So Graham and all of the other Repub mouth pieces have the daily talking point that 75 billion goes to the States and that isn't stimulus.

Tweety doesn't say a word. But how can a Repub, the supposed defenders of States Rights, argue that 75 billion going back to States, where the people live who pay the taxes, be a non stimulus. Do States paying teachers, police, fireman, fixing roads, etc, not constitute a stimulus?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's all about business
In their minds if the money doesn't create jobs in the private sector, it isn't a stimulus. The End.

They're idiots. That's all there is to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oviedodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
2.  i can tell you the Crist here in FL WANTS the stimulus badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Great point
I have seen Mayor Villaraigosa from LA on but not one Republican Mayor or Gov. Strange, could the media be suppressing Republican dissent?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat in Tallahassee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. We need to keep the University functioning; things look bleak
We got a scary memo yesterday about what might happen when the legislature meets in March.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't that good? Many states are facing budget shortfalls.
Especially California and Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Is it good for the State and the people?
Hell yes, I live in CA and things could get ugly. But Republicans will screw the people to win a battle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. We are the UNITED STATES of America. Not red states, not blue states.
We are the people of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THere is no USA with out STATES. There are no congress people or senators without STATES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Republican = Worse Than Useless

Had enough "bipartisanship" yet, folks?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. My bigger complaint is the media framing
If these jerks were called on the inconsistencies they would be less likely to come on a spout B.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. You're right rufus dog, except when you point them out you don't get invited back.
You know, liberal media and all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. What a load. I'm working on a document at my state employer
to show exactly how what we stand to get (housing money) will stimulate our state economy. We can create over 1000 jobs with just a small part of it. Idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's called "federal revenue sharing" -and its been a staple of economic policy
in tough times not only in America- but in similarly organized countries abroad (like Canada and Australia) for many, many years.

Until Bush, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Uh, I live in a state
and right now our state is really hurting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC