Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kirsten Gillibrand was a lawyer for the tobacco companies!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BluegrassDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:22 AM
Original message
Kirsten Gillibrand was a lawyer for the tobacco companies!
It just keeps getting better and better. It turns out she was a big defender of big tobacoo! I'm beginning to think she should be running in Mississippi rather than New York. She loves guns and tobacco companies. By the way, Hillary Clinton was a fierce opponent of the tobacco companies.

"Senator Gillibrand worked for the New York City law firm Davis, Polk & Wardwell for eight years. From 1995 to 1999, while an associate at the firm, she played a central role in defending the world's largest cigarette company, Philip Morris, whose #1 product, Marlboro, is the most popular cigarette among children as well as adults. She represented Philip Morris when it faced several grand jury investigations and possible criminal charges from the Department of Justice."

http://awearnessblog.com/2009/02/senator-gillibrands-big-tobacc.php


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. that's a good reason not to trust her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Nobody's asking you to lend her five bucks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appal_jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. lawyers are hired guns
The American legal system is modern gladiatorial combat. Gladiators (i.e. - lawyers) who refuse battles don't remain employed for long.

My brother in law is a young corporate attorney and a good guy. He slogs into work every day and defends sometimes nefarious businesses because he's got law school debts and rent to pay (plus some of his work is also defending good businesses from ambulance chasers and parasites). Once the debts are paid off, he wants to shift to more progressive causes: pro-union and pro-environment.

A job is not the sum total of a person. Gillibrand's pro-civil liberties, pro-environment, and pro-choice background carries more water for me.

-app
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. and in the 1990s Al Gore was still taking tobacco money and defending them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. No, I'm afraid you're a bit late.
The old complaint about Ms. Gillibrand was that she was an evil right-wing blue dog Dem.

The new complaint about Ms. Gillibrand is that she is a flimsy sell-out flip-flopper who happily dropped her few conservative positions as soon as she was offered a ticket out of her district.

Please try to keep up with the appropriate bandwagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
45. but, but, but . . . there are so many bandwagons. And so little time.
Very funny, Occam Bandage


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. the nra and big tobacco. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. OMG! Let's tar and feather her!
:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well, I'm not sure about the feathers
But she probably got enough tar working for the death merchants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. If someone once worked in a law firm, and their firm once took on a client you don't like,
then that means you have to hate that person. It's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. People who don't work in law or politics don't understand that.
And honestly, they never will. They think when you practice law or politics, you only ever work for people that you agree with / trust / like. The reality is that not everyone is so fortunate as to be able to pick and choose their clients or employers, particularly when you're a junior employee. Idealism gives way to pragmatism when you need to pay rent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. bluegrassdem, just remember - whenever you use info to tear down a Democrat...
... there will be the same information out there about a Democrat YOU like. Happens time and time again.

In this case, Al Gore was a worse offender in the same period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BluegrassDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. At least Al Gore was from tobacco country in Tennessee
Just like in Kentucky, you can make a plausible argument why they'd support tobacco as it's vital to the state's economy and so many workers depends on it. In NYC...err, not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. So? When he was VP, he represented American, not just Tennessee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. Wow, I didn't realize Philip Morris ran its corporate ops from a farm

Usually that kind of operation is located in a big city... like NYC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
29. So it's okay to support Evil Corporations if they're in your state and support your state's economy.
Phillip Morris was based out of New York City until 2003. So doesn't that mean that Gillibrand gets a free pass, then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
33. Oh yes, and what is Gore's excuse re: censorship?
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 11:26 AM by WI_DEM
Oh, Tennessee, of course. That excuses it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. "while an associate at the firm..."
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 10:31 AM by depakid
lawyers do what they're told.

Some of the other allegations/relevations cited though appear somewhat more revealing.

We shall see....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. And Barack Obama befriended Bill Ayers,
attended Rev. Wrights church for 20 years, and bought property from rezco; Ms. Solis husband and Mr. Geithner have tax issues; Al Gore took tobacco money; Caroline Kennedy was born into the wrong family, and everyone worked in a law firm that represented bad guys.

GO IT? NO ONE IS PERFECT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Is that you, Sarah Palin?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. And General Clark
was fired from his Saceur post.

;-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. What has that got to do with your repeating Sarah Palin's Rovian attacks against the POTUS?
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 11:07 AM by ClarkUSA
I could give a shit about General Clark's being fired as SACEUR right now, especially as you seem to be excusing
Gillibrand's corporate whoring for Big Tobacco and using this OP as an excuse to repeat Sarah Palin's general
election lies about President Obama.

You're obviously still not over the primaries. Is this going to be your bitter ender MO for the next eight years?

Move on.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. here, take a supply of these...
i like passing them out to people from Club Bitter who get the vapors;

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. lol! Thanks.
:rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. ClarkUSA, you seem to miss my point entirely; sorry.
My point is SIMPLY that NO CANDIDATE, or POTENTIAL CANDIDATE, is perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Sure I did....
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 11:24 AM by ClarkUSA
:eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. The point is obviously that the OP is the exact same type of bullshit as all of that.
It's true that Obama knew Ayers and Rezko. It's true that Clark was fired. It's true that Gillibrand worked for a law firm that took on a tobacco company. So fucking what? None of that means anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Thanks.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. No, the OP is highlighting the pro-Bush tax cut Sen. Gillibrand's recent corporate whoring.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 11:38 AM by ClarkUSA
Gillibrand's recent past employment record is a window onto how she evolved her DLC pro-Big Business principles,
just as Barack's three years of $10K a year community organizing is a revealing window onto the evolution of The
Community Organizer-In-Chief's liberal/progressive principles.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. So working for a law firm is now "corporate whoring?" If that's the case,
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 11:48 AM by Occam Bandage
the term "corporate whoring" now means absolutely nothing whatsoever. I don't expect lawyers to quit their jobs and start selling apples from carts on the street the first time they're assigned to a morally dubious client.

If she actually approached Phillip Morris about a job, then yes, there might be a point. If she decided to take a job that was offered by Phillip Morris, then there might be a problem, sure. But since she was working at a law firm, and then worked on the case to which she was assigned rather than quitting her job in a fit of moralistic pique, well, I don't really see much of a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. As per the OP, she worked on behalf of Big Tobacco for a law firm.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 02:30 PM by ClarkUSA
She picked a law firm specializing in corporate whoredom, unlike Barack Obama after he got out of Harvard Law School.
Coupled with her pro-Bush tax cut stance and other DINO policy positions (at least the ones she hasn't pulled a
Mitt Romney 'bout-face on in the past week or so since she was plucked out of Chuck Schumer's DLC hat via Gov.
Patterson), I'd say once again, past is prologue.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. I have to hand it to you there:
that was the most inane-buzzword-dense post I've read in a long while. I can't even imagine how one could cram more vapid labels in such a short space--"blue dog," maybe, but I can't see a place to put it without increasing the volume of empty talking points to the point where the whole post collapses into a parody of itself. "DLC hat" is particularly impressive; I would never even consider the possibility of attaching a political epithet to the word "hat," nor would I have been able to tie that hat to two unfavored-by-DU politicians, using only one word's separation.

I mean, your post doesn't actually bring up any substantial points, but I have to give you a 10/10 on style. Well done indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. there needs to be an online generator to create posts like that
Enter in a few names and organization, click "enter," and admire the results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #48
58. I suspect there already is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. Only someone who's a DINO cheerleader would refer to "pro-Bush tax cut" as an "inane-buzzword"
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 03:56 PM by ClarkUSA
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. the DLC opposed the Bush tax cut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. ...
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. ...
:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Then you've just proved that Gillibrand has gone beyond DLC into DINOland on that point.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 03:42 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. what I just proved is the oddness of your phrase "DLC denier."
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 03:52 PM by wyldwolf
And further exposed your already well known thin knowledge of things you rant and rave about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Your tendency towards uncivil personal attacks is a constant. What a boor/bore you are.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:04 PM by ClarkUSA



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. Did you not call a DUer "Sarah Palin" earlier in this thread?
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:06 PM by wyldwolf
waaaaaa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. It's called a descriptive analogy, which happened to fit. How is that a personal attack, pray tell?
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:19 PM by ClarkUSA



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. post #16. Unless there are two ClarkUSA's posting today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. lol!
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:21 PM by ClarkUSA
:nopity:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. I did. So?
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:45 PM by wyldwolf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. Editing your posts again and again after I post answers? Guess I have to do that now, too.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 05:08 PM by ClarkUSA


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #72
80. your time stamps show you started that little game first. LOL! LOL!
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:56 PM by wyldwolf


Can you not let your original statements stand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #80
86. Only to keep up with you. But now I must go, because only one of us has a life.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:57 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #86
87. of course to keep up with me, since my replies keep prompting you to edit your originals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #80
88. Repeat: Only one of us has a life. Buh bye!
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 05:09 PM by ClarkUSA
Keep babbling, though; it makes everyone laugh. Plus, kicking this thread will let everyone know what a DLC/DINO
corporate whore "Mitt Romney" Gillibrand really is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. how's your life in your mom's basement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. See post #63.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:21 PM by ClarkUSA

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. first you didn't know what I was talking about, now you do?? LOL
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:43 PM by wyldwolf
"Do not publicly accuse another member of this message board of being a disruptor, conservative, Republican, FReeper, or troll, or do not otherwise imply they are not welcome on Democratic Underground. "

Last I checked, Palin is a Republican. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #67
78. You are deliberately expressing a falsehood.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:43 PM by ClarkUSA
"ON EDIT: ClarkUSA post, before he edited it, denied ever calling anyone Sarah Palin."

That is a falsehood; I did no such thing at all. You have no ethics, do you? You really are reaching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. two can play your game:
That is a falsehood. You have no ethics, do you? You really are reaching. How malicious of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. I am playing no games but you are. Now you can go back to playing with yourself.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:51 PM by ClarkUSA
:rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. sure you are
make a post, wait for the reply, then edit the post replied to. Your time stamps throughout the thread show it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. in response to your edit. ha ha. It's that post edit conspiracy from you again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. What are you talking about now?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. what are you ranting about now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. Now you're reduced to schoolyard taunting? How predictable.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:37 PM by ClarkUSA


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. Now you're reduced to playing the victim
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:46 PM by wyldwolf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. How am I "playing the victim" when I am stating the obvious?
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:37 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. by being obvious about playing the victim
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:47 PM by wyldwolf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. And she'll win big
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #77
82. Talking to yourself again? Get a life.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 04:48 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #82
84. Are you asking if you're me? because I'm replying to you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. any chance to get in a dig, right? .... the bitterness, you can smell it over the internets...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. You nailed it. It's funny how the smell of bitterness is the same as the stink of 100% bullshit.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 11:18 AM by ClarkUSA
It's so easy to spot the bitter enders. They always use Republican talking points to trash President Obama
while defending all those who are DLC corporate whores. :eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
85. it's the scent you leave in every thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
57. First off, the relationship was very thin--but even if it wasn't,
are you saying being an associate of Bill Ayers is equal to shilling for a tobacco firm? And spare me the lesson on Al Gore, I'm not a loyal follower of his and have asked many times why he is elevated to messiah status in the blogosphere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #57
93. My point is that no one is perfect.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
15. So what? Al Gore owned a tobacco farm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
17. So she is a recent corporate whore on top of being a pro-Bush tax cut DLC shill?
Edited on Fri Feb-06-09 10:55 AM by ClarkUSA
How unsurprising. Boy, can't wait until she "follows in Hillary's footsteps" as she claims she wants to. The DLC must
be creaming in their pinstripes at the idea.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
19. yeah, I already knew that
There were ads run against her for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. Wow - I thought she was an associate in a New York law firm

She landed Philip Morris as a client for that firm?

That's pretty amazing for an associate.

Usually, associates in law firms just work for whomever the firm's clients happen to be.

I didn't realize that associates were writing their own ticket these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. What's more, I hear that as a teenager,
she worked at a McDonalds (a huge corporation responsible for the sad state of American health) where she happily served hamburgers to all sorts of people: big-money lobbyists, ex-felons, pedophiles, and the like.

She just can't be trusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
32. I wonder how her voting record will be in the Senate? That's what I'm looking at
not a bunch of stuff from her past. She's the Senator from NY whether we like it or not and I'm hoping she will surprise a lot of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
35. Well, this thread is rapidly turning into a cluster fuck
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
37. She received her law degree in 1991
Is it really likely that she played a central role in the firm's major high profile case in 1995?

She did vote yes on SCHIP, which raised taxes on tobacco - that was last week.

I hope that HRC doesn't still have the same positions she had in 1991 on everything - I think she still supported the foreign policy that argued we should support the Contras then - as did her husband and Gore (he actually ran on that in 1988).

I was not thrilled when she was picked, as nearly everyone else mentioned (if not everyone) was to the left of her. It is only fair to wait and judge her on the votes she makes and the work she does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
38. Even tobacco companies are allowed to have lawyers
Just like Ted Bundy was.

It's up to the judge/jury to decide the case after hearing both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #38
51. Ted Bundy often acted as his own lawyer.
And he killed a lot less people than Phillip Morris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. Please try and get your facts marginally correct!
She was a lawyer at a lawfirm which had Phillip Morris as a client. She didn't get to choose whether or not to work with them, and her work consisted of assembling documents for subpoena requests.

Since she was in Congress, she voted for all three anti-tobacco bills that came up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
41. Newsflash: JOE BIDEN DID CRIMINAL DEFENSE

Ummm... gang, prior to getting onto the New Castle County Council, I gather the larger world outside of Delaware doesn't know what Joe Biden did for a living.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. Well, EXCUSE ME while I dig up some shit on Joe so I can stay current on this cluster ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. ROFL

One of the funnier things that Freepers recycle on Joe Biden, in reference to the aneurysm which nearly killed him is, "He's had unsuccessful brain surgery."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
49. And what are you going to do about it?
She's been picked and she's going to be the Junior Senator from New York. All the DU threads and screaming in the world won't change that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
52. Well, being a tobacco lawyer is "kind" of like
working on the board of Wal-Mart :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eggplant Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
63. Oh, ferchristsakes.
Name one piece of legislation she sponsored or voted for that benefitted the tobacco industry, or STFU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
89. A good example....
..of the type of person I probably couldn't stand being in the same room with for more than five minutes, and I'm not referring to Gillibrand. Quick to judge for kudos to feed the ego usually backfire, like this attempt. Wonder if you guys will ever learn that you're not as genuine as you believe yourself to be. Thanks.
quickesst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
91. Fuck Marlboro
I smoke American Spirits. I used to smoke Camels until they got rid of Joe Camel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
92. Kirsten Gillibrand Causes Borderline-Insane OUTRAGE at DU
Film at 11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #92
94. that's SENATOR Kirsten Gillibrand...
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #94
95. It is almost like you are DUing from DLC HQ
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
96. Worse.... Obama smoke(s)(d).........
OH NOES!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
97. I love my new senator.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
98. It is a huge mistake to assume that lawyers views match
their clients. She was actually third chair in the case you mention--that means she did much of the legal research and little to none of the courtroom presentation. When you put in your time at a big law firm, you don't choose your cases but you do get to learn from some of the best legal minds.

My New York relatives are very happy with Gillibrand. Her positions are popular with upstate residents many of whom are rural.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
99. she eats babies and does unspeakable things with gun barrels in the privacy of her own home
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 05:29 PM by dusmcj
Oh the humanity !!!

Your piety and adherence to the Big Book of Rules is so admirable, why, if I could, I would, I would, uhhhhhhhh

Drool on Your Saintly Toes !!!!!

That's it, c'mon, send me your addresses so I can come by and slobber on your piggies, I'm savoring it now !!!!!!!!!!

...

I fear for the future of the Democratic Party and how much of the real 'progressive' agenda it may take down the drain with it before the death thrashings of its current self-appointed (well, that should be 'annointed') leadership cease.

We Won We Won We Won!!!!! Yay for Us Us Us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
100. We're going to lose her seat in Congress in 2010, too.
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 05:32 PM by ClarkUSA
Latest polls have the top Republican challenger leading the top Democratic challenger 2-1.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lavender Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
101. Yet she voted against all the bills that the tobacco lobby favored when she was in Congress
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 07:01 PM by Lavender Brown
:boring: This is getting old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC