Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feinstein planning to vote against the stimulus bill? My hubby

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 12:54 AM
Original message
Feinstein planning to vote against the stimulus bill? My hubby
said he heard that this evening on tv. Anyone know if this is true, and if so, why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. She doesn't like the emphasis on tax cuts - not enough job creation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree.
Spend the money now and spend it on infrastructure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I certainly agree with the objection, but we've got to get something
going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. She's right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I agree on the tax cuts, but do we know who they are for?
I can go along with tax cuts for middle class. That is what Obama campaigned on ya know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. So DiFi is selfishly making "the perfect" the enemy of "the good."
What a patriot. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. the greater good.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. No one else would either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. I hope that all Dems vote against it, and start the whole process over...
Don't understand why they are letting the Repugs dictate this bill in the first place.... If only we had some leadership in both the Senate and the House, we would be in a much better situation.... At this point, we might just as well have a majority of Repugs in both Senate and House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I see a one sided media and if I'm lucky,
I might catch a speech on C-SPAN for a slice of reality for an hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Repukes aren't dictating anything. Most of this was done to get DEMOCRATS on board
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. She will vote for the compromise but she wants more defense spending since she has major
defense contractors in her district
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I think she got it...
I don't know if anyone has seen what the revised bill looks like, but last night it was mentioned that one of the revisions was several billions for military spending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Yes, we don't want any cuts in The War Machine despite more people living on the streets.
Our priorities are seriously skewed. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. Political posturing -- she will vote for it.
Every Dem will vote for it. They have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. If she votes against it we'll know she isn't planning on running for the
governor's job in California.

Where she currently leads handily in polling.

If she wants to be the Governor of California, she's going to need every nickel she can get her hands on if she runs and wins. She would likely not hamstring her own (potential) administration as governor of a huge state by voting against funding for its operation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
17. This is one time I agree with her, but she won't vote against it
nice to see her taking the more liberal position and being part of the effort that called the Republicans' bluff (by taking aim at their tax cuts while they were taking aim at the spending).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
18. For once I agree with Feinstein. The GOPers have destroyed this
legislature. It needs a new beginning. 42% tax cuts is untenable. Dropping money from head start and other school programs, like improving school buildings, upgrading them for energy purposes is typical GOPerism. It is time for change. TAX CUTS have come close to destroying this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
19. Perhaps this will help...
http://www.ktvu.com/news/18658019/detail.html

KTVU.com
Feinstein: 'I Think As We Dither, Rome Burns'

Friday, February 6, 2009
WASHINGTON -- Convinced tax cuts will not stimulate the nation’s economy, Sen. Dianne Feinstein spoke out Friday against President Barack Obama's economic recovery package.

“I’m going increasingly concerned about the bill as to whether it is really going to be a stimulus,” she told fellow Senators during a debate of the bill.

Feinstein then roiled through a litany of California’s financial woes.

“I come from a state which has more people unemployed today than the population of over a dozen states,” she said. “A state where the bread lines are growing, Where the need for assistance is growing. Where the state has a huge deficit. Where counties are unable to fund their operating maintenance. Where all capital projects have stopped and where the state now furloughs employees.”

“I think as we dither, Rome burns.”

Feinstein said her issue with the bill is the tax cuts included.

“What in my view a stimulus is, is not candidly speaking a tax package,” she said. “I do not believe in this economy tax cuts are simulative… I worry about this economy. The point of this package is to get jobs out to the people. So I reserve the right at the end of the day to vote against a package that does put those jobs out there.”
While Feinstein spoke out against the package, Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada was trying to rally support for it.

"The world is waiting to see what we're going to do in the next 24 hours," said Reid, reflecting the Democrats' fierce urgency to wrap up the bill as conservative Republicans criticize the legislation and the economic picture grows bleaker.


Copyright 2009 by KTVU.com. The Associated Press contributed to this report. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC