Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Pelosi expedite the stimulus bill, or fight to restore the funding?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:34 PM
Original message
Should Pelosi expedite the stimulus bill, or fight to restore the funding?
It's a lot of money that was cut out. That's a lot of money, it means tens of thousands of jobs, maybe hundreds of thousands. Important programs like schools to name the biggest example.

On the other hand, Obama is pushing for speed. He's going to be making his case publicly to get this done NOW. Fighting over this will cause delay and even possibly risk passage of the bill.

I personally think she should give up more than she is inclined to do on this one. Obama is fair and he will repay her on important matters which will come up later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tell Reid to grow a pair and get the big bill passed.
Partial solutions are nonsolutions. The House version is already such a small % of GNP that it's effects might be only marginal and those tax cuts will only further undermine our assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. no amount of arm-twisting is going to get repug support for the house bill
they're going to obstruct any attempt to pass it as is

take that 3/4 of a loaf of bread and move on


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. We don't need them to vote for it.
We only need them to shut up long enough to get 51 votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. you need 60 votes
so as to prevent a filibuster


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. No, you need 60 votes to force an end to debate.
To make a filibuster, one has to continue debating without shutting up. We should not be caving in on the mere suggestion of filibuster. We should make them do it and make sure everyone knows they will not allow a vote on the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Agreed. The 60 votes myth needs to be ended and the dems need to FIGHT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. if you don't end debate
you're not going to get a vote

I agree that the leadership should not cave in on the threat of a filibuster


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I've heard Rahm can be persuasive
even more now that he works for the president. Reid would have to have quite a pair to defy Rahm on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. IMO Expedite now. Restore in future legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. We need a big cannon.
A little cannon with a future musket shot that may or may not happen will not be as good. Our cause is ripe now. If we can't get these things attached to a big bill, then we will not be able to get them later on their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. I agree
In fact, I think some of the "centrist" senators who helped negotiate this deal said they did not oppose funding all these things, they just thought they belonged in their regular appropriations bills and not in the emergency stimulus package. So I'm optimistic that we can get some of that money restored when the relevant appropriations bills come up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. They should include good but non-stimulus items in this years budget
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meowomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. expedite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Before Pelosi Does Anything She Should Consult With The W.H. And.....
see what they want her to do - and then - do it. She shouldn't try doing this without finding out how the President wishes her to proceed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. oh, she knows
They problem is they want different things. The question is how hard should she fight for what she wants to keep and what Obama wants to give up?

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/06/pelosi-calls-cuts-to-stimulus-bill-very-damaging/

Ms. Pelosi, Democrat of California, said she had spoken with the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, earlier today, wryly adding that both Mr. Reid and the Obama administration were well aware of her views and concerns about cutting billions of dollars in proposed aid for education, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. Get it through. Go back and pick up the other stuff later. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. In Conference is when you will see what exactly the WH wants in the package
Thats when their voices will be heard.

And coming out of Conference you only need 50 votes in the Senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC