Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What the centrists have wrought

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 05:58 PM
Original message
What the centrists have wrought
Edited on Sat Feb-07-09 05:58 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
What the centrists have wrought

I’m still working on the numbers, but I’ve gotten a fair number of requests for comment on the Senate version of the stimulus.

The short answer: to appease the centrists, a plan that was already too small and too focused on ineffective tax cuts has been made significantly smaller, and even more focused on tax cuts.

According to the CBO’s estimates, we’re facing an output shortfall of almost 14% of GDP over the next two years, or around $2 trillion. Others, such as Goldman Sachs, are even more pessimistic. So the original $800 billion plan was too small, especially because a substantial share consisted of tax cuts that probably would have added little to demand. The plan should have been at least 50% larger.

Now the centrists have shaved off $86 billion in spending — much of it among the most effective and most needed parts of the plan. In particular, aid to state governments, which are in desperate straits, is both fast — because it prevents spending cuts rather than having to start up new projects — and effective, because it would in fact be spent; plus state and local governments are cutting back on essentials, so the social value of this spending would be high. But in the name of mighty centrism, $40 billion of that aid has been cut out.

My first cut says that the changes to the Senate bill will ensure that we have at least 600,000 fewer Americans employed over the next two years.

The real question now is whether Obama will be able to come back for more once it’s clear that the plan is way inadequate. My guess is no. This is really, really bad.


http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/07/what-the-centrists-have-wrought/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I love Paul Krugman, but
he scares the s*** out of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let's wait for the final version of the bill before we jump to conclusions. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnieGordon Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rachel warned us of this..
While everyone else was just sitting around slurping down more of their fucking kool-aid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Right. So how does Krugman propose we get the Centrists on board
a bigger stimulus bill. I like Krugman but is his insights really all that useful right now? We know its not what we want but how to get it to how we want it is the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Lock up Rahm, for one. Collins (R) was bragging in WAPO about
what he did for them to get the thing chopped down even more.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/06/AR2009020602097.html?wprss=rss_print

Obama endorsed the moderates' effort and brought its leaders -- Sens. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) -- to the White House to discuss their proposed cuts. White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel attended the final meetings in Reid's office last night to work out lingering differences. Before Emanuel arrived, Collins said, Democrats were advocating $63 billion in cuts. "Then Rahm got involved, and a much better proposal came forward," she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. I loathe that man more and more.
Anybody can negotiate by giving away the farm. It takes actual skill to do it properly.

Which is to say, who the hell needs Rahm Emanuel? Nobody on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. They are useful
because he has a large audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Krugman was more concise as to so called "centricism" on the Scarbough clip
Edited on Sun Feb-08-09 12:29 AM by depakid
You don't build a bridge halfway across an economic chasm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. there will be more bills
FDR didn't pass everything that he wanted in one bill. There were a series of bills. There will be now too.

This is my opinion - but I really thing that President Obama and top level Dems and economists have an overall plan. They know that they cannot get everything passed at once. They are politicians and they know how politicians work. They have reached a compromise to get this bill passed, one that they can live with. They will propose additional bills and additional language and programs into other bills such as appropriations, transportation, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. This is just the first in a series of bills
FDRs efforts started much more modestly. Those who expect everything from one bill are asking for disappointment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. you are defending the critics
The very reason why FDR was able to do more was because of powerful pressure and criticism from outside of the party. It was vastly more organized and militant and radical than anything we have today.

You cannot shoot for a compromise - which the New Deal was. A compromises can only come when there are two sides aggressively fighting. The opposition isn't compromising, they are calling our bluff, and we are caving.

People here are intolerant of criticism and dissent, and are demanding that we all remain passive and silent and trust the leadership. That isn't what happened during FDR's administration - far, far from it. FDR welcomed pressure. He said "if you want me to do something, force me to do it." Good leaders know that they can do nothing without public pressure, and there will never be public pressure if people succeed in shouting down and silencing critics.

If people want this administration to fail, the best possible way to achieve that is to continue to call for an end to dissent and criticism.

We rabble house > that builds and focuses public pressure > the government responds > the administration succeeds.

We demand loyalty and silence > the public remains confused and weak > the government takes the safe course > the administration fails.

That is how things work in a representative democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. So what are we to do apart from whine in the papers?
do we have to wait to 2010 to get 2 more democrats in the senate?

Krugman and his allies in the media need to paint a big scarlet F on the specific republicans who have fucked this thing up. The whole nation needs to know their names. Blaming centrism doesn't cut it. There is no centrist party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. self-delete to move post
Edited on Sun Feb-08-09 02:26 AM by chill_wind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. With the centrists running off with the Republicans and giving away the farm
We don't effectively have a Democratic party, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. This the very worst and scariest part, I think:
Edited on Sun Feb-08-09 02:47 AM by chill_wind
"Now the centrists have shaved off $86 billion in spending — much of it among the most effective and most needed parts of the plan. In particular, aid to state governments, which are in desperate straits, is both fast — because it prevents spending cuts rather than having to start up new projects — and effective, because it would in fact be spent; plus state and local governments are cutting back on essentials, so the social value of this spending would be high. But in the name of mighty centrism, $40 billion of that aid has been cut out."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnotforgotten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. Remember That Obama Is A Centrist As Well - Time To Hold His Feet To The Populist Fire
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Obama is left of what this country has had in the last 30 years, don't know if centrist is fair
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. What you say is absolutely true.
But we really need him to be a little farther to the left than where he is. There may be times when liberal fiscal policy is not the answer, but this is not one of those times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. The center has been pulled so far to the right that a centrist looks like he's further left.
Obama is nowhere near as far left as some people have been painting him. And he's certainly not as far left as the moron Republicans have been griping about.

Regards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. Good example of why I'm not a fan of centrism.
Or centrists.

I hear that the House plans to reintroduce some of the items cut. I hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. I bet Krugman regrets attacking the original stimulus plan. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. You have to govern from the center to get anything done...
90% of the Senate bill is the same as the House bill. Larry Summers seemed okay with this morning on the talks shows. Get it passed and move on. If it is clear something more needs to be added later then add it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. We need to demand they govern from the PEOPLE's center, and not the CORPORATE center!
We have mostly corporatists in the "center" now MASQUERADING as representatives of the people's will.

This is the way that corporate power still has hegemony over us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC