Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Today's provocative statement: If this were a dictatorship, Barack Obama could fulfill every one of

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 03:21 PM
Original message
Today's provocative statement: If this were a dictatorship, Barack Obama could fulfill every one of
your ideological dreams.

DISCUSS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was telling my friend the other day, I would not mind a dictatorship under Obama. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well unfortunately, "dictate" is one of the few words....
... he can neither spell nor knows the meaning of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. self delete
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 04:32 PM by Jim Sagle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I would mind very much. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. I sincerely hope you forgot the sarcasm icon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Don't be ridiculous n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. I know what you mean, I think
I trust him to make the right decisions for our country by getting input from people with all kinds of viewpoints. I trust him to have a good heart (look at what he gave up personally, in terms of wealth and self-aggrandizement, to be a community organizer). I think he would always act for the best for all, rather than for CEOs and trust-fund babies, if he were The Sole Decider.

So I wouldn't mind a dictatorship under Obama in the sense that I think he would genuinely try to do what's best for the country and not just follow a knee-jerk ideology like certain previous presidents I could name. I realize you weren't saying you think an Obama dictatorship would be the ideal form of government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Please delete this - you're embarrassing all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressIn2008 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. I have no idea if this is sarcasm or not. Which speaks volumes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. ;-) NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. He is against gay marriage and for the war on drugs.
Why do people think we elected DK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. For the War on Drugs?
Care to elaborate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Although he has stated he supports decriminalizing marijuana, he has since retracted that support.
It is usually safe to assume those who would lock up stoners are supporters of the war on drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. What 'isn't' safe to assume?
Where/when/how did he 'retract' his support of decriminalizing marijuana?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Exactly...unless the new amendments made on medical marijuana count.
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 04:18 PM by vaberella
But it wasn't Obama...that was congress. And correct me if I'm wrong, isn't that suggested not done yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. Stop the Drug War dot Org has been chronicling Obama's back and forth on this subject.
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle_blog/2008/feb/01/nevermind_barack_obama_wants_to_">StoptheDrugWar.org

Some of the comments are fun if you enjoy people screaming at each other over Ron Paul and Nader.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. My state just decriminalized pot this past election....
I think that it is the best way for some laws to gain traction. Start at the state level, and when enough states join on it's easier to get support to pass legislation in Congress. I don't understand why Obama would feel the need to straddle the fence on this one. Just because he has an opinion doesn't mean he is forced to act on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Which state is your state?
I agree with the opinions in your post. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Massachusetts...
It was wonderful to hear some cops come out in favor of the law. I find it hard to believe that at this time there is opposition. Forget about the medicinal advantages. The Reagan years, with all the cocaine dumped on the country to support the Contras was so fucked up, in so many ways, but I find it hard to believe that anyone living and breathing in the 80's could possibly have an objection to pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. He's not against gay marriage.
Do you know Jeremiah Wright advocated for Gay Rights? Actually he created a singles night in his church for gay couples. Obama was a supporter of the church for what it did in the community and the rights it supported of the people. Yes, Obama has said that "marriage" is for the man/woman. But he supports fully and has said several times that he believes in Civil Unions. Civil Unions are basically "marriage". That's what it is. Basically anyone who does this bullshit "marriage" thing has to do a civil union, ie they need to go to their Courthouse and get their marriage certificate so they can do that "church" or minister followed "marriage", but basically they were married already by law. So Obama fully supports the Gays to "marriage" he just uses language to keep the more conservative idiots shut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. If he supports marriage equality
he should say so. It is insulting for you to play semantic games with my family's rights and money. You do not understand the law, and your John McCain air quotes around "marriage" don't change that. Sorry.
Civil Unions are not marriage. Period. And Obama recently picked Kaine to head the Party, and Kaine opposes civil unions as well. So that makes Obama's support of civil unions weak and highly questionable. He has said so many different things, who knows what he means.

And in case you have not noticed, Rev Wright is not the President. Cheap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. With all due respect...I think or at least what I hope is meant is that
in this country, the recognized form of marriage for purposes of anything to do with government for ANYONE of any orientation will be a civil union. Once you have that paper, you are married in the eyes of the government, with all the civil rights that entails. After that, you are free to have that marriage sanctified (or not, as you please) by the church of your choice. This effectively takes the CHURCH out of the business of marriage for any legal or governmental aspect. That way, no BS "morality" can get in the way of civil rights, and would be a much better system in our country, providing the division between church and state. As it stands right now, the religious zealots think they have the right to decide who gets married. Recognize ONLY civil unions as the form of marriage for legal purposes and you end-run them. I think it's brilliant and fair, and I hope it happens soon.

Gay Rights ARE Civil Rights!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. "If this...dictatorship", we'd still have Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. What.
What.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. He doesn't need to be a dictator. All he needs to do is shitcan the Repuke compromises--
--that have made the stimulus bill far less useless. Let the shitstains rilibuster--then he could get on the bully pulpit stand and urge the public to give them hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Corporatist Theocracy, even with reasonable labor laws, is still crap
I'm a capitalist, but the profit motive should not be king in every instance. We should have socialized medicine and more securities regulation, and social services should be administered secularly and by governmental agencies, instead of "private" industry.

One of the depressing parts of human nature is how deeply people long for the moment when they no longer have to think or pay attention. The agonizing horror of having to make judgments when everything's not completely cut-and-dried hounds people to hell-on-earth.

Sorry, but I'm not in the market for a deity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. No thank you to any dictator.
I like my country's style of government (imperfect though it may be) as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. My chief ideological dream happens to be opposition to dictatorship. Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. No, it wouldn't, there would be revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
24. Oh Lord...
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 04:51 PM by Peacetrain
That is the right wing wet dream...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. this implies that the only way he can get things done is with GOP support, which is false
and if Democrats stray from the fold, they deserve a good bitch-slapping.

Unfortunately, the Democratic Congressional leadership seems to only give that slap to progressives who disagree with the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC