Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Summary of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (including compromise)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 06:45 PM
Original message
Summary of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (including compromise)
Summary of Appropriations Provision of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (including Nelson-Collins amendment and other floor amendments as of February 6) (PDF)



Talk Turns to Working Out Stimulus Differences:

The tradeoffs needed to get enough votes for the plan in the Senate presaged tough bargaining with the House before a final bill is delivered to Obama, who, according to one lawmaker, signed off on the Senate deal. Top House Democrats were already complaining about the Senate moves before the agreement was formally announced.

The single biggest spending cut to the original Senate plan comes out of a $79 billion state fiscal stabilization allocation that would help states avoid tax increases and cutbacks in education and other high priority services. The compromise trims that funding to $39 billion and sets up a conflict with the House-passed bill that allocates $79 billion.

Another major difference between the House and Senate bills involves school construction. The House allocated $14 billion to renovate, repair and build public schools. The Senate zeroed out the $16 billion its original bill set aside for that purpose.

The compromise also eliminates $3.5 billion for higher education facility modernization and purchase of instructional equipment. The House voted to provide $6 billion for higher education.

The compromise would cut additional funding for Head Start and Early Head Start, programs to prepare children to succeed in school, from $2.1 billion to 1.05 billion. That’s half of the $2.1 billion in the House bill.

The Senate substitute eliminates $5.8 billion in the original measure that would have been spent on grants and contracts to prevent illness through health screenings, education, immunization, nutrition counseling, media campaigns and other activities. The House has set aside $3 billion for prevention and wellness.

Funds to expand the use of electronic record keeping in health care are cut from $5 billion to $3 billion in the substitute, still more than the $2 billion in the House plan. Under the new Senate plan, a national coordinator would distribute the money to pay for technology, planning and training.

The compromise eliminates funding for pandemic flu preparedness, a prominent target of critics who said figuring out how to increase the supply of vaccine would not create jobs. The House bill includes $900 million for flu, and the original Senate proposal had $870 million.

The Senate substitute zeroes out $2.25 billion in funding for a neighborhood stabilization program, which would have provided funds to states, local units of government and organizations to purchase and rehabilitate abandoned and foreclosed upon homes. The House allocated $4.19 billion for the program.

In the compromise, funding to increase broadband access in rural areas and other underserved parts of the country is reduced by $2 billion, from $9 billion to $7 billion. That’s still more than twice as much as the $3.175 billion in the House bill.

The Senate proposal also trims additions to the Byrne justice assistance grant program, which provides formula funding to state and local police. The compromise would cut $450 million from the Byrne grants, reducing funding from $1.5 billion to $1.05 billion, according to information provided by Ben Nelson , D-Neb., an author of the compromise. The House allocated $3 billion for Byrne grants.

Other differences that will have to be resolved in conference include the additional funding for a federal program that provides home weatherization services to increase energy efficiency for low-income families. The Senate allocates $2.9 billion for the program, while the House bill has $6.2 billion.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. thank you NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's interesting.
It's highly possible that most of these cuts are reinstated in Conference.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I can't believe the Governors aren't ripping the hell out of their Senators
for that State funding cut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Absolutely... I hope they are
especially those republican governors in red states that are begging for these funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsmirman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you - sorry for missing this
did a scan of the board forgot that silly little thing called "search" :spank:

This is very helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. I hope between The Governors and Obama's
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 12:09 AM by Kdillard
townhalls next week these Republican Senators will be ripped a new AH. I am keeping my fingers crossed that by the time the bill comes out of conference it will more closely resemble the house bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baikonour Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. I have a question about the broadband access issue.
How is the federal government going to choose what ISP's are going to get funding to spread broadband access into rural parts of America? I personally loathe Comcast, they are an AWFUL company, and I'd hate to see them receive one cent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Add my question: Why are taxpayers funding this at all?
Once again, a public utility is enhanced with public money in order for corporations to make profits.

Nationalize broadband!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Thank you - it is great having the real list of what is in this package
It looks like it still contains a huge number of very important things. The biggest loss appears to be in the support for states. the case for doing that to keep teachers, policemen, firefighters etc in their jobs is so stron, I hope that that is put back in the conference report. (There has to be something less important that could be removed.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes,
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 06:06 PM by ProSense
Collins and company essentially bartered away their votes for an opportunity to cut stuff out of the stimulus package. They didn't add any Repub proposals, which is a great thing. The package is still comprised of proposals crafted primarily by Democrats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
il_lilac Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. thanks, I've been looking for this!
keep hearing how "bad" this is from both sides of the aisle. Looks like progress to me. Just hope it puts people to work fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC