Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Names More Economic Advisers. (Krugman not among them.)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
thesquanderer Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:59 AM
Original message
Obama Names More Economic Advisers. (Krugman not among them.)
Source: Washington Post

President Obama yesterday unveiled a new team of economic advisers, a group drawn from corporate, labor and academic circles and tasked with providing the administration counsel from beyond his inner circle of aides.

In announcing the White House Economic Recovery Advisory Board, Obama said he was seeking "to ensure that no stone is unturned as we work to put people back to work and to get our economy moving." The group is particularly heavy on executives of companies known for innovation and success in the international marketplace.

The board will be chaired by former Federal Reserve chairman Paul A. Volcker. Its members include Jeffrey R. Immelt, chief executive of General Electric, and James Owens, chief executive of Caterpillar. Both companies have strong sales around the world, though both are encountering hard times amid the slowing global economy; Caterpillar said last month it would cut 20,000 jobs.

The board also includes representatives of labor organizations: Anna Burger, who chairs the labor group Change to Win, and Richard L. Trumka, secretary-treasurer of the AFL-CIO. There are also two prominent conservatives: William H. Donaldson, who served as chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission during the Bush administration, and Reagan administration economic adviser Martin Feldstein, who has supported the idea of a massive economic stimulus package but was sharply critical of the legislation passed by the House of Representatives.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/06/AR2009020600739.html



I guess a Nobel prize isn't good enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. that group doesn't bode well either. Obama, ya gotta pick some better ones than CEOs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. I guess you didn't read the article..
Paul Krugman wrote. He has no desire to work in the government. Shocking isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Thank you. And Krugman is one voice, read by many. He's not
always right or wrong, but he is also not the oracle who knows all. This Krugman mania baffles me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veritas_et_Aequitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. It's because he's the biggest name non-monetary policy/SS economist in the public eye.
Thus he seems to have become an icon for a frustrated liberal base to look to and project their own hopes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesquanderer Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Yes, just one voice...
...and certainly not an infallible one. But often a perspective that seems worthy of serious consideration and inclusion into the conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Fine. Consider him, but he's not the arbiter of who is right or wrong.
Just saying, it seems to me too many people give him too much credit. He's consulted with Obama's team, has been asked for his input, but he seems to rather enjoy being out there bashing any and all things that are going on. Hey, kind of reminds me of Krugman during the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesquanderer Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. not the same
re: "He has no desire to work in the government"

I'm not sure being on an advisory board is the same as "working in government." I'm sure those other people aren't leaving their day jobs either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. I'm just going by what he said...
However...you may know better about his feelings about a position on an advisory board.

Krugman Touts His Influence as a NYT Columnist on Obama Policy Decisions

http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2008/20081208165205.aspx

In a Dec. 6 interview in Stockholm, Sweden, the Nobel Prize-winning New York Times columnist told the ironically named Adam Smith, editor-in-chief of Nobelprize.org, that he found himself more effective in his role at the Times lately He said he was more influential in shaping policy as a journalist than he would be in a high-ranking position on the Obama economic team.
-----------------------------------------

I like to think I’m a good analyst,” Krugman said. “But, I don’t think I’m a good bureaucrat of any kind. I might think differently if I wasn’t at the Times, but as it is I have a mouthpiece, people are listening. I probably can have as much influence, as say on the shape of this upcoming economic stimulus package from where I am as I could if I were, you know, the third-ranking member of the Obama economics team – something like that, so I think it’s probably as good of position as any.”
http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2008/20081208165205.aspx

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesquanderer Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. thanks for the details and links (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. He is one of those people who work better outside the loop. And
being outside the loop allows you more freedom to voice your opinions. I notice that Robert Reich is not in there either. President Obama had better be reading them or he is missing some good advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. We might be better served by having Krugman remain an outside observer and columnist.
It's not like he doesn't have a vehicle top get his opinions out there. And I'm sure he won't always agree with the Adminstration. I have been quite happy with his latest essays that the Stimulus being not BIG ENOUGH while others are happy to whittle it away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oh great, a Volker re-run
What, we're rewarding the guy who helped get us in this mess.

More of the two party/same corporate master system of government at work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. Volker recommended AGAINST many of the worst policies and was overruled
I have the greatest respect for him, because he predicted extremely accurately what the ultimate outcome of those policies would be. I will google for an article or you can do it yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
36. Oh good you have something more
to bitch about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veritas_et_Aequitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. No, but blind adherence to monetary policy is. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Krugman's Nobel Prize is in international economic policy, not domestic economic policy.
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 11:07 AM by ClarkUSA
Besides, President Obama made a public appeal to Krugman to offer up a plan of his own instead of complaining.
So far, nothing from Krugman but more whining. Krugman needs to move on from the primaries and stop acting
like a friggin' PUMA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesquanderer Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. reference?
re: "President Obama made a public appeal to Krugman to offer up a plan of his own instead of complaining"

Interesting, I missed that! Any chance you have a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Here...
http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/obama-asks-paul-krugmans-advice
Obama asks for Paul Krugman's advice: Show me the Money!

snip//


OBAMA: If Paul Krugman has a good idea, in terms of how to spend money efficiently and effectively to jump-start the economy, then we’re going to do it. If somebody has an idea for a tax cut that is better than a tax cut we’ve proposed, we will embrace it. So, you know, one of the things that I think I’m trying to communicate in this process is for everybody to get past the habit that sometimes occurs in Washington of whose idea is it, what ideological corner does it come from. Just show me. If you can show me that something is going to work, I will welcome it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesquanderer Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. thanks for the link (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. He should have invited (and still can) Krugman for a one on one at the White House
After all, he won the Nobel for his contributions to understanding world economy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. It was at a press conference a couple of weeks ago.
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 11:24 AM by ClarkUSA
A reporter brought up yet another one of Krugman's ad nauseum anti-Obama complaint columns and Barack
responded the way I described (but in a far more gracious way, of course) and additionally called for any
politician, any economist, any American, who thinks they have a good idea to let him know and he'd listen
if it was a "good idea". Basically he told Krugman to put up or shut up in the classiest of ways. Unfortunately,
Krugman hasn't put up or shut up.

Guess he's made his NYT Op-Ed living sniping at Obama from his ivory tower at Princeton U. since the primaries .
Why stop now? I doubt Krugman knows more than Lawrence Sommers, widely acknowledged to be the top expert
in domestic economic policy in the country as it pertains to stimulus macro/microeconomics, who said that the
revised stimulus plan and the one originally put out by Team O "overlap by 90%". Only a fool who has no clue
what it is like to try to get controversial legislation passed through Congress would think that was not enough.
Fortunately, Team O consults with Paul Volker and Lawrence Sommers, both of whom do know what is like to
craft legislation for passage. Krugman is simply a chronic malcontent.

Check the DU archives here. There was some discussion about it and there may even be a video at DU Videos.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesquanderer Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. International problems
re: "Krugman's Nobel Prize is in international economic policy, not domestic economic policy."

The two seem especially tied, at the moment, as the downturn seems essentially global. The interdependence of the different economies is an element of what's going on. Our weak domestic sales are hurting the economies of Japan and China. Our outsourcing of jobs to India etc. is hurting our own employment. We are not operating in a vacuum.

Besides, someone with the prize in int'l economics probably knows more than your average bear about domestic economics too.

BTW, pardon my ignorance, but what is PUMA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. He supports outsourcing. 'Nuff said. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. More foxes guarding the henhouse. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakeXT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
16. Isn't this like 3 days old? The guys from LTCM got a Nobel prize too----------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesquanderer Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. it's from Saturday
but I checked the DU news listings and no one had posted it here, and I thought it was worthy of notice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
19. Unbelievable....
"William H. Donaldson, who served as chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission during the Bush administration..."

Unbelievable. Talk about the fox protecting the hen house. This is the same SEC that turned its head to Bernie Madoff. And others. And there were others. They were just able to cover their asses by cooking their books. No doubt with a little help from Congress and its "bailout" of these crooks. And they are crooks. Every last one of them. The "have-mores" that Bush represented were really just the "stole-mores."

I have given up on Barack Obama. Hopefully some sanity will prevail in the Congress. Maybe after the banks post enormous profits and Wall Street recovers and the government's own unemployment figures reach 15%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. The guy was also the Chairman and CEO
of the New York Stock Exchange Between 1990 and 1995. Horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
25. Hey Obama - WHERE'S KRUGMAN???????

It's looking more like "change" is "more of the same" catering to the new oligarchs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Krugman specifically said that he didn't want a government post. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. WTF is it with people and Krugman? There are at least a brazillion
economists out there. Krugman isn't interested in anything except critiquing what's happening at the moment, and that's fine. We need people to do that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. kool-aid comes in all kinds of flavors
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 12:14 PM by AtomicKitten
It's ironic that those belittling others who support Obama by calling them kool-aid drinkers have found their own messiah and brand of kool aid.

Tough to rationalize Krugman as the progressive messiah though when he supports cheap labor and outsourcing. Makes his rants against centrism ring hollow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. self delete n/t
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 01:29 PM by firedupdem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. They need a Krugman Doll
maybe put a beard and some clothes on this guy and be done with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
33. Krugman and Reich provide vocal, independent support
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
35. Donaldson?! Why not just appoint Yogi Bear as Undersecretary of Pic-in-ic Baskets?
Why stop there? Why not bring out Harvey Pitt? Too bad Keaton's dead. Hey, I hear Milken's looking for some redemption; why not HIM?

On the other hand, Volcker's a good move. He's problematic, too, but he's not a total ideologue, he's smart, and he's not hidebound or bought-off.

News flash: the SEC under the Republicans was about as honorable as the Department of the Interior was, and in precisely the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baikonour Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
37. Krugman wouldn't take the job, for any amount of money.
Smart man. I wouldn't want that much responsibility/pressure right now either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC