Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Show us where the waste is in this bill!! Republicans are fools and

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:13 PM
Original message
Show us where the waste is in this bill!! Republicans are fools and
they really do hope that our middle class disappears, so that they can privatize and embezzle what we have left. When the people or the public have control the Rethugs can't get their greedy hands on things and exploit, dismantle, and, destroy them for profit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not waste, just pork.
...and by "pork", I mean spending in a "stimulus bill" that has little or nothing to do with actual stimulus.

Money for alternative energy research? Good idea, but pork.

Money for the arts? Pork.


This is a stimulus bill. Some people are rightfully making noise about its being turned into an omnibus spending bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baikonour Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I respectively disagree.
Alternative energy will be the backbone of our economy one day, and one day relatively (and hopefully) soon. Once the auto industry can finally master it, you can say goodbye to cars from Japan and elsewhere in Europe. But the auto industries in Japan and Europe are also working diligently to discover these technologies, and if they discover them before is, then, well, I think you can figure out the result. We NEED funding for alternative energies, and we need it now.

As far as the arts go, I can see where you're coming from. But for example, the film industry is a rather large and important part of our industry. It was one of the few industries that actually saw growth during the great depression, as well. Does the federal government need to send Hollywood billions of dollars? Of course not, but a tax write-off for film (as in, actual film that directors use to shoot their movies) was proposed and not a bad thing. Of course, it was cut out, but that's life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Then, where do you draw the line?
The video game industry is larger than Hollywood. Where is their stimulus? How about the porn industry? They contribute billions. The list would literally be endless if that logic were used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I don't dispute their value, just their net short-term stimulus effect.
They may be good programs. They may have a long-term positive effect on the economy.

That doesn't mean they belong in a stimulus bill.

Once again, lawmakers are using a crisis situation to pass spending measures that have nothing to do with the crisis...and I'm sick of them doing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. That "pork" will create jobs.
Pork is an idiotic term to begin with. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, but how many and how soon?
Almost any government spending will create jobs. The measure in a crisis stimulus bill should be the short-term net gain to the economy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. How many jobs did the CCC create within its first four months?
And if we are not supposed to spend money on infrastructure projects that are relatively ready to go, what should be in the stimulus bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rwalsh Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Agreed.
Our economy is bleeding to death. This bill should have had only stuff that would have produced immediate results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. What should be in there, then? Tax cuts?
Spending money to stimulate the economy is what a stimulus bill should do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. My big three? Infrastructure spending, national health insurance, national pension plan.
We need over $2T in infrastructure spending in the next 5 years anyway. It would provide jobs and result in a tangible benefit.

By implementing national health insurance and a national pension plan, the huge legacy costs to employers would be eliminated, enabling them to retain employees.

Changing payroll tax withholding (FICA) by exempting the first $20k of income and removing the cap would put more money in people's pockets too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. School infrastructure was cut.
We would have received about $768,000. Two new roofs, installed this summer. POOF!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I didn't say that ALL of the spending was bad, or that ALL of the cuts were good.
IMO, there's still a lot of spending in that bill that doesn't belong there...and I think it's going to doom the legislation to failure when it's applied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. This money has to go out fast and should ,imo,go to improve this
country in many areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. I respectfully disagree
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 05:26 PM by CitizenPatriot
Almost everyone I know works in the arts; film, tv, writers, painters, etc. I know people who work at the Smithsonian, too. Artists also teach children on govt grants for school systems which can't afford an arts program. The arts have proven a positive way of helping many children increase their grades in academic subjects. thereby investing in our future with smarter graduates. So, this isn't pork, in my opinion. It's job creation across sectors, which is a smart way of providing stability (when one sector goes down, others prop up the general economy). film and tv provide jobs for millions of people (or indirectly impact small businesses, etc -- witness the shut down during the WGA strike) of the population and films remain of our reliable exports.

Alternative energy isn't pork -- I mean, pork implies an abuse, a waste, meant to help one specific area (wiki cites Palin's bridge to nowhere as example). I see alternative energy as the future of this country. What is pork about it? We are behind Europe in alt energy. Providing funding for jobs in alt energy is like investing in our country AND stimulating the economy. It's also one of the best industrial sort of jobs to replace the steel and auto industries -- to give jobs to those people, thereby lifting those areas out of economic tailspin (foreclosures, unemployment, etc) while we invest in our future.

Edited to add: "In United States politics, the term pork barrel refers to the appropriation of government spending for projects that are intended primarily to benefit particular constituents, such as those in marginal seats or campaign contributors. snip...The term pork barrel politics usually refers to spending that is intended to benefit constituents of a politician in return for their political support, either in the form of campaign contributions or votes."

Wiki.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Again, I'm not debating the value of the arts or alternative energy research.
They just have no place in a stimulus bill.

This bill should be about providing the most immediate stimulus bang for the buck, not funding pet projects or long-term research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. OK...but why?
I'm no economic expert, so my question is sincere. Is alternative energy a pet project or will it create jobs? Perhaps it is both?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baikonour Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Apparently funding to make schools better was wasteful.
Because, you know, a good education doesn't lead to a good job or anything...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tax cuts are not stimulus and everyone knows it.
It doesn't stop them from accusing us of "pork, pork, pork."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. AMEN!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. "Pork" is a republican meme.
Some people here have bought into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. "Pork" is a term used to identify inappropriate spending legislation.
It's inappropriate to be funding the arts in a stimulus bill.

That IS pork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. The 42% of the package related to Tax Cuts are a waste
and will produce negligible *stimulus*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. everything that would help single/marrieds over $80,000
is pork, businesses are not on this list of mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC