Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House: We Want Non-Traditional Media To Have Seat At Table

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:23 PM
Original message
White House: We Want Non-Traditional Media To Have Seat At Table
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/white-house-we-want-non-traditional-media-to-have-seat-at-table/

White House: We Want Non-Traditional Media To Have Seat At Table


I asked a White House aide to explain the surprising and much-discussed decision by President Obama to take a question from The Huffington Post at his presser last night.

“One of the ways to change Washington is to open it up and make it more accessible by ensuring that outlets that aren’t considered part of the traditional media get opportunities to participate,” the aide told me. “And that’s exactly what the President did last night.”

This has a boilerplate feel, but it becomes more interesting when you consider the broader context here. As I noted yesterday, senior Obama aides David Axelrod and Robert Gibbs have embarked on a purposeful strategy of reclaiming Obama’s outsider mantle by using cable news and the Beltway media as a foil, hammering them as out of touch with real Americans.

In that context, this White House aide seems to be suggesting that the Obama team may believe letting non-traditional outlets participate will help loosen the stranglehold on our discourse the big news orgs have enjoyed for so long. This pledge won’t have much meaning, of course, until we see what happens in practice. Still, it’s worth reiterating: Yesterday Obama took a question from HuffPo but didn’t take one from The Wall Street Journal, the Chicago Tribune, Time, or Newsweek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. That kinda messes up their "theme of the day" style of journalism. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Damn right alternative media needs a seat at the table. I don't trust the MSM.
Do any of you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hell no. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. I agree, but be careful
As goes the old saying, "Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer." One of the ways the government was able to finally seduce the MSM was by granting them "access." You only get "access" if you're on the team and willing to play ball. Maybe I'm being a little alarmist, I do trust Obama overall, and I'm glad the the alternative media has become the force that it has to where the White House wants to include them.

But there's a part of me that wants the relationship to never get too close. The fact that alternative media is shut out and on their own as opposed to embedded like the corporate media is what makes the alternative media so much better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Now THAT is a good media strategy. Very clever and original.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Absolutely, positively music to my M$M busted eardrums!!!
How exciting AND progressive!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Would that include Bill Moyers and Amy Goodman.
They're the only journalists I can
think of right now that I respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. both of them would be great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I loved
Moyers pointing out how Amy Goodman doesn't appear on MTP panels, while people from the Christian Broadcasting Network do, on last Friday's show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. If Moyers or Goodman get a press pass, they will ask him questions
that he may or may not be prepared to answer.


I look forward to seeing the center being brought to these journalists especially when they challenge the assumptions and the wrongheadedness of the MSM.

No internet reporter has the depth and longevity that Moyers and Goodman have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. As long as it's our non-traditional media, and not "their" non-traditional media
So who will DU's reporter be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. translation: "We realize this is the 21st century"
A lot of people get their news primarily on-line these days. It's good to see them changing with the times.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Yes! And I loved how KO made a fool out of Ari Fleisher! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. The media monopoly needs to be broken up
Bring back the media ownership regulations that were eliminated under the Telecommunication Act of 1996.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. A nice punch in the mouth to the corporate whore media.
:applause:

Nicely done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. Cable Chatter! Cable Chatter! Teehee! LOL!
They can kiss my ass!

Newsweek is owned by the same folks that own MSNBC, NBC, etc...., so they got to ask a question.
Times is owned by the same folks who own CNN, so they got to ask a question.
WSJ is owned by the same folks who own Fox, so they got to ask a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Wondeful. Obama is showing signs of greatness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. Ariana should have
been thrilled it was Sam Stein who had an excellent question and seemed like one of the most relaxed..and Rude Pundit now wants to try for some White House Creditials:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. And, I would hope so! Afterall,
the netroots made a huge difference in the campaign~ What if there were only corporatemedia to get the news from?

Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC