Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some more validation...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
damonm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 05:42 PM
Original message
Some more validation...
of my thinking on how Obama's "bipartisan" outreach will kill the GOP from Daily Kos:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/2/9/93530/64491/480/695142

From the very beginning of his administration, less than three weeks ago, Obama has known that he has a commanding majority in the House of Representatives. In the House all that is required to prevail is a simple majority, so Obama has always known that he would be able to pass some version of a stimulus through the House. Barack Obama made a great display of reaching across the aisle to persuade House Republicans to climb aboard and support a bill that Obama already knew he could pass without a single Republican vote. Why would Barack Obama do such a thing?

The mainstream media bit and bit hard. If Barack Obama was pursuing those Republican votes, then it must be that he needed those votes somehow--though certainly not to pass the stimulus, he just needed them somehow, and the Republican Party was winning some kind of major victory by withholding from Obama votes that he seemed to want for some reason.

Or perhaps something very different happened. Perhaps Barack Obama set a trap for the Republicans, a trap they fell for with startling gullibility.

My evidence for this? Remember, I don't believe in honeymoons or mandates: either you can do something or you can't--and it is already well-established that Barack Obama had the votes in the House of Representatives to pass a version of the stimulus bill without a single Republican vote. So why didn't Obama simply have Nancy Pelosi quickly pass the stimulus and move on to persuding the Senate? Why did Barack Obama visit Capitol Hill and bring dozens of cameras and put the Republican leadership in the spotlight? Why invite to cocktails and put the Republican leadership in the spotlight? Why throw a Superbowl party and put Republican leadership in the spotlight? Why has Barack Obama worked so diligently to put the Republican leadership in the spotlight and on the record?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I like the cut of your jib, JCWilmore...
Indeed, this puts a new slant on the term "transparency".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damonm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. A boot of shameless self-promotion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. The 2008 campaign trail is littered with the bodies of those who underestimated the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because his 2012 theme will be......
.... "I tried to work with these guys and they fought me from day one!"

Those of us on the left and those on the right, we love partisan bickering, we'd all love for him to destroy the Pubs as Newt did to us back in '95 .... but most Americans aren't like that. You may remember during the debates, McCain's line on that CNN instapoll of undecided voters would tank whenever he would say anything that sounded remotely partisaned.

And Barack Obama, being the smart man that he is, knows this. Regardless of what happens with the economy, he must simply hold on to his base, maintain control of the middle, pray that Sarah Palin is the GOP's nominee .... and he's got it locked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree with all of that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC